Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Julius ceasar

Satisfactory Essays
722 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius ceasar
Student Name
Teacher’s Name
World Literature Honors
10 December 2010
Julius Caesar

[Thesis] In William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony’s strategies in his speech mark him as a superior orator. [CM] Brutus tries, however, to seem superior, yet the countrymen’s reaction to Antony’s speech make him supreme. [CM] Antony’s ability to use Brutus’ words against him also contributes to his superiority. [TS] Mark Antony gains the respect of the commoners through his familiarity with them. [CD] Antony cleverly gains the commoners’ favor with familiarity by starting his speech with, “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears” (Shakespeare III ii 46). [CM] By starting with the word “Friends,” Antony tries to make the people believe that they are his friends rather than just another person. [CM] The commoners believe that Antony is supreme because he points out that they are all his friends, while Brutus says that they are just Romans to him. [CD] Additionally, Antony makes the commoners aware of his relationship with Caesar by saying, “He was my friend, faithful and just to me” (III ii 46). [CM] By stating that Caesar is his life-long friend, Antony attempts to get the commoners to feel the same way about the late Caesar as he does. [CM] Additionally, Antony uses his relationship with Caesar to his advantage in persuading the commoners. [CS] Using his familiarity with the people, Mark Antony shows that he is a far better orator than Brutus is. [TS] Additionally, Mark Antony craftily twists the meaning of Brutus’ words in his speech. [CD] For example, Antony quotes Brutus by saying, “The noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious” (III ii 46). [CM] Antony attempts to use Brutus’ misuse of the word “ambitious” to describe Caesar to his advantage by saying the word with a certain amount of seriousness and sarcasm in his voice. [CM] Furthermore, Antony twists Brutus’ definition of “ambitious” into a more unsuitable word in describing Caesar. [CD] Additionally, Antony skillfully uses sarcasm in his speech when he says the phrase, “And Brutus is an honorable man” (III ii 47). [CM] Antony clearly says the word “honorable” to describe Brutus in a sarcastic manner, because Brutus is not honorable in any way. [CM] Furthermore, Antony is forced to use word play, such as sarcasm, so that he can prove himself to be a superior orator, as well as to stay within the guidelines that Brutus has given him. [CD] Mark Antony proves himself to be a far superior orator by intelligently twisting Brutus’ speech into his own. [TS] Most importantly, Mark Antony controls his audience’s emotions with his clever use of visual prompts. [CD] For example, Antony persuades the commoners by saying, “But here’s a parchment with the seal of Caesar; I found it in his closet; ‘tis his will: Let but the commons hear this testament—Which, pardon me, I do not mean to read…” (III ii 48). [CM] By supposedly showing the commoners Caesar’s will, Antony gains their favor and interest. [CM] Additionally, Antony makes the commoners believe that he does not want to open the will, which causes them to start begging for him to open it. [CD] In addition, Antony uses Caesar’s own body as a visual prompt to show the commoners the damage that the conspirators’ daggers did to Caesar by saying, “Look, in this place ran Cassius’ dagger through: See what a rent the envious Casca made: Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabb’d…” (III ii 49). [CM] Mark Antony makes an attempt to gain the sorrow of the commoners by showing them the bloody stab wounds that the conspirators inflicted upon Caesar. [CM] Furthermore, Antony puts a large amount of description into the wound inflicted by Brutus in order to manipulate the commoners’ anger toward Brutus. [CD] Mark Antony’s use of visual prompts to manipulate the commoners’ emotions plays a key part in showing that he is a far superior orator. [Thesis] In conclusion, Mark Antony is a far superior orator compared to Brutus in William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. [CM] Mark Antony’s use of word play and visual prompts in his speech allow him to persuade the audience into feeling sorrow toward Caesar and anger toward Brutus. [CM] Lastly, Antony shows his superiority by clearly making Brutus look foolish.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The art of manipulation and persuasion is truly effective when one is incompetent to the fact that they alone are not thinking for themselves. Since the beginning of time, humankind has wanted to have control. In some instances they will strive for power in ways that make them oblivious to right and wrong. Occasionally, they will go against what they are told to do and instead to what they want to do. In the play Julius Caesar the power of persuasion and manipulation of language is clear when two men, Brutus and Mark Antony, spiel to the people of their country, each attempting to gain the support of the populace over the death of Caesar. Even though Brutus establishes ethos throughout his speech, Mark Antony’s uses it to his advantage…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    julius ceasar

    • 391 Words
    • 5 Pages

    FROSH-SOPH GIRLS TOP 10 UPDATES (through 5/20/13) Must be run in Frosh-Soph only competition. 100M Jennifer Teal 12.62 FAT (1998) Alex Green 13.44c (2008) Liz Laurel 13.54c (1998) Colby Valentine 13.74c (1998) Starla Tressler 13.79 FAT (1998) Tiarra Thomas 14.04c (1999)…

    • 391 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Now, Shakespeare was a famous playwright of the time and it seemed logical for him to express his ideologies through his popular plays to comment on his society. Shakespeare was able to use scenes such as the Brutus vs. Antony orations to stress the conflicting ideals between truth and propaganda, as well as their effects on society. Shakespeare captures Brutus’s honesty when he states “I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him” through his use of prose within the speech. Prose reveals to the audience of plebeians Brutus’ rational and logical thinking behind assassinating Caesar, to which he emphasised “not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more.” The way in which Brutus excuses his actions appears to be beneficiary to the population instead for his selfish purposes, as well as depicting Caesar as a negative influence to the Roman Empire. This is soon contradicted by Antony’s oration which was written in blank verse. The speech mocks as well as contrasts Brutus’ intentions implicitly though the repetition of “But Brutus is an honourable man” which follows conflicting contradictory statements. This depicts Antony’s oration skills as both more superior and authentic to Brutus’s speech as it exposes the contrast between higher and lower order rhetoric. Brutus’s and Antony’s orations, create a powerful…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scheming, manipulation, and backstabbing are common in almost every society in this day and age. As seen on many occasions in Julius Caesar, the conspirators spend a lot of the play plotting against Caesar,because they fear what he might do if he comes to power. Brutus is portrayed as the tragic hero, and he gives numerous speeches to convey his opinions and feelings about the subject matter. In William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the character Marcus Brutus makes many appeals to rhetoric, specifically ethos and pathos, in order to get his point across to the audience.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony proves himself to be the most effective manipulator. This feat was the product of many factors that Antony both took into account, and employed to a greater effect than his counterparts. Using the illustrative Rhetorical Triangle of Aristotle, Antony was able to convey the three main ingredients of good rhetoric to convince the Roman mob to turn upon the conspirators, mere moments after being told by Brutus that they had acted with “honor”. Using Logos, Antony’s logical argument that Caesar was not ambitious made the mob begin to doubt their current suppositions that Caesar deserved death for his ambition. With the emotive appeals of…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Senators Swansong

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Brutus and Antony go in different directions when it comes to ethos. Brutus gets on the stage and says, “Believe me for mine honour, and have respect to mine honour, that you might believe me” (III.i.14-15). He is telling the crowd to believe him based on his honor, and while they are judging what he has done, remember how honorable he is. His approach is formal and almost condescending. He is on the stage and he knows he has accomplished more admirable deeds than his audience which merits him honor. But, highlighting this sets him above his audience. Antony however comes up and says, “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears” (III.i.60). This opening is similar to Brutus’ except for one key word, friends. This automatically changes the entire tone of the speech. Now, Antony approaches the crowd on the same level as them, as equals. He is no better, no worse. He is a citizen of Rome, just like them.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony’s use of repetition showcases brilliant sarcasm. He utilizes the word “honorable” to describe Brutus and Cassius, two of Caesar’s assassins, on nine different occasions: “for Brutus is an honorable man” (3.2. 82), “so are they all, all honorable men” (3.2. 83), “and Brutus is an honorable man” (3.2. 87), “and Brutus is an honorable man” (3.2. 94), “who, you all know, are honorable men” (3.2. 124), “I will wrong such honorable men” (3.2. 127), “I fear I wrong the honorable men” (3.2.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony makes a speech to the people of Rome after Brutus spoke out about killing Caesar with the conspirators. Through Marc Antony’s speech, Shakespeare uses language techniques such as irony, repetition/tone, and figurative language to illuminate conflict between the citizens of Rome and…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before his speech begins, the whole crowd is going wild with overwhelming support for Brutus. Knowing this, Antony is quickly able to capture the attention of the people by saying, “For Brutus’ sake, I am beholding to you” (64). By starting off with saying that Brutus endorses whatever Antony is able to say, they are suddenly more curious to hear what he say and what exactly their beloved Brutus approves of. By saying this, Antony is able to borrow Brutus’ honest reputation and use it as his own. Towards the end of his speech, Antony borrows Caesar’s renewed ethos, once again merging voices and giving Antony even more credibility. He asks the audience, “Wherein hath Caesar thus deserved your love?” (234). Antony successfully borrows Caesar’s great reputation and increases his credibility for the people to trust him.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Ceasar

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Shakespeare's play, Julius Caesar, Calphurnia argues to her husband, Julius, to remain home after she dreamt of his murder. In her argument, Calphurnia uses juxtaposition, personification, and imagery to persuade him. She uses these rhetorical devices well, but was unable to convince him.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Ceaser

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Poverty and welfare has become an alarming problem over the history of America. With a Capitalist economy, citizens of the United States do not have an equal distribution of wealth leaving some very poor. The government gives assistance to those most commonly in the form of welfare or a monthly check providing those in need of funding to ensure their well-being. With an unemployment rate of 7.9% in the United States, the government is providing approximately 131.9 billion dollars (not including food stamps or unemployment checks). Helping the needy is most definitely a responsibility for the U.S Government but there are many people that abuse this system and end up with more money annually from the government than some of our hard-working, professionals that are in turn paying for the people abusing the system, which is wrong. My policy brief will highlight the different types of abuse that the current system of welfare and methods of dealing with poverty is receiving. It will also list a variety of ways to strengthen the program providing more for the truly needy and those that are eager to get back on their feet and earn money the true American way consisting of hard work, time, and dedication. The over all goal for my policy briefing will be to help lead American from becoming a country of entitlements and back to its roots of hardworking, prideful citizens that the founding fathers worked vigorously to establish. Our current policy for welfare and government handouts cannot be continued especially with our alarm debt of over 16 trillion we can no longer afford these massive payouts especially to those that frankly do not deserve it.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus was a devious man, even though what he thought he was doing was right. Brutus told his fellow conspirators to kill Caesar "boldly, but not angerly."(3.1.256-257) Brutus was one of Caesars right hand men, and yet Brutus kills his own friend. When Antony asks to speak at Caesars funeral, Cassius says no, but Brutus tell him that Antony will speak, but only what Brutus tells him to say. Brutus also embraces the fact that he just killed his friend, and also tells the senators who had just witnessed it to not be afraid, but to stay because ambition has paid its debt.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays