Preview

julius caeser essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
802 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
julius caeser essay
Julius Caesar Speech Essay

In act lll of Julius Caesar, a flawless specimen of literature using classical appeals, both Brutus and Mark Antony deliver a speech using the three classical appeals, ethos, pathos and logos at the funeral of Julius Caesar. Both men effectively convey their point to the listeners/readers however; one in particular is exceedingly influential. The more powerful one is by Mark Antony, who uses credibility, emotion, and logic in his speech to induce the crowd at the funeral. Brutus’ speech includes these appeals as well but not as convincing as Antony.
Pathos is the most cleverly used component by Mark Antony. Antony uses emotion as an advantage to make him sound more powerful and influential. He poses several rhetorical questions that evoke emotions about Caesar, like In section one (line 31) Antony states “What cause withholds you then, to mourn for him?” Antony instantly answers that question and then gives the listeners time to think about it, furthering the effects of his speech. Also in section one (line 13) Antony states “He was my friend, faithful and just to me.”, this makes the people believe that it was an unjust crime to kill Caesar because he was trustworthy and honest. Antony brings attention to Brutus’s stab by saying “This was the most unkindest cut of them all.” (Scene 3, line 15), by saying this Antony successfully persuaded them that Brutus us guilty and makes the crowd even more furious. Antony evokes more feeling from the audience by blaming his enemies for the crime and caused more woe than Brutus does.
In Brutus’ speech, pathos does not come as easily, but it is still there. It starts on line 14-18 with statements such as “hear me for my cause” (scene 3, line 13-14) and “believe me for mine honor” also “you may be the better judge” which gets the audience listening to what he has to say and makes them think that there is a good reason for Caesars death. He finishes with a line that says “I slew my best lover

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Brutus used discouragement to keep citizens of Roma from arguing against him, but Antony did show true devotion for Caesar and grief for his death. "I weep for him...who is here so rude that would not be a Roman...so vile that will not love his country?"(128: III: ii) Brutus talks about weeping over Caesar's death without any tears, then dissuaded the crowd so they would not admit that Caesar did not deserve to die. "...My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me (weeps)"(134: III: ii) Antony actually had to stop and cry because of his overwhelming anguish, influencing he crowd to feel empathy, knowing how it feels to lose someone very close. Brutus used deceit for pathos and Antony used heartache, which is obviously more…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Now, Shakespeare was a famous playwright of the time and it seemed logical for him to express his ideologies through his popular plays to comment on his society. Shakespeare was able to use scenes such as the Brutus vs. Antony orations to stress the conflicting ideals between truth and propaganda, as well as their effects on society. Shakespeare captures Brutus’s honesty when he states “I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him” through his use of prose within the speech. Prose reveals to the audience of plebeians Brutus’ rational and logical thinking behind assassinating Caesar, to which he emphasised “not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more.” The way in which Brutus excuses his actions appears to be beneficiary to the population instead for his selfish purposes, as well as depicting Caesar as a negative influence to the Roman Empire. This is soon contradicted by Antony’s oration which was written in blank verse. The speech mocks as well as contrasts Brutus’ intentions implicitly though the repetition of “But Brutus is an honourable man” which follows conflicting contradictory statements. This depicts Antony’s oration skills as both more superior and authentic to Brutus’s speech as it exposes the contrast between higher and lower order rhetoric. Brutus’s and Antony’s orations, create a powerful…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    qwertttyutrey

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Act III scene ii of Julius Caesar, Antony delivers his famous funeral speech to the citizens of Rome. In his speech he utilizes ethos, logos, and pathos to sway the Plebeians against Marcus Brutus’s speech vilifying Caesar, moments before. Using the Short Analytic Essay format (Intro with Thesis, Body Paragraph, Conclusion) analyze one of these persuasive techniques utilized by Antony and explain how and why the information was included into Antony’s memorable address; what effect it had on the hostile crowd. Be sure to use specifics and analysis, rather than summary.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus and Antony both use different rhetorical techniques to persuade the crowd at Julius Caesar's funeral. However, the arguments can be very different and one speech can be more persuasive than the other. Brutus's and Antony's speech have a different base on the same topic and both have a valid point in each. Brutus lectures about how Caesar is a courageous person. Antony, however, discourses about how Caesar is determined and how Brutus transferred captives home to Rome. Antony also speaks about how Caesar was a faithful man to Rome and to what degree he paid for his fault. Brutus talks about Caesar's honor and if Caesar was dead, then Rome would be complimentary.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off, Antony was a genius in how he presented his speech to the populous with how he sparked so many different emotions in them. In the beginning of his speech Antony sparks impatience in the Roman people by making them want to hear what Caesar has left them in his will. And when he finally tells them what he included in it, he made them feel melancholy towards their deceased leader who was described by Antony as a noble and respectable man who cared only for the people and the country that he was about to rule over. But very quickly after that, the audience of Antony’s became enraged towards the men who had called themselves his friends and killed Caesar. They wanted to murder them all and avenge their beloved leader. Antony told them not to be angry, but he clearly did this on purpose because he too wanted to avenge Caesar’s death. He very skillfully manipulated these people’s feelings and made them vengeful as he wanted them to be.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis Oh Rhetorics

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The tone of voice Brutus used in his speech was subjective and also persuasive. Brutus wanted the citizens to know that he did the right thing by killing Caesar. Brutus specifically states that he killed Caesar for the love of Rome. Brutus also states that Caesar was ambitious, which is used as a negative connotation in the speech. In the speech, Brutus tries to gain the citizens respect while explaining himself. Brutus displayed strong emotions, which is portrayed throughout the whole poem. Brutus wanted the citizens to agree that killing Caesar was a good thing and not a mistake. Also in the speech, Brutus used a lot of rhetorical questions which also helped establish a serious tone.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The paralyzing powers of speech often engulfs the human mind and corrupts it to the will of the speaker. Omnipresent in society, rhetorical appeals, the appealing powers of speech, are made to project the speaker’s thoughts and ideas of a subject matter. From ordinary conversations to commercial advertisements to public addresses, appeals are present to influence an audience’s mindset. The appeal of Logos creates compelling evidence for the audience to develop conclusions in the speaker’s favor while the appeal of Pathos relies on morals, values, and emotions to create a response from the audience. Combined with the appeal of Ethos to establish credibility in the speaker, the appeals are potentially powerful enough to cause everlasting impacts on society and revise history itself. Throughout history, great orators such as Hitler, Martin Luther King, and other political leaders have used the power of speech to transform people’s thoughts and ideas. This practice has dated back to ancient times to Mark Antony at the funeral of his friend and mentor, Julius Caesar. In William Shakespeare’s Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony establishes himself to his audience, the plebeians, with Ethos then uses Pathos to pull on the audience’s heartstrings and sway the plebeians’ beliefs with Logos in an attempt to make the audience doubt Brutus’s justification of killing Caesar because he was ambitious.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be able to correctly utilize pathos, you should use rich metaphors, match your vocal delivery to the emotion, tell stories, use descriptive words, and use sensory words. “ If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less but that I loved Rome more.”(3.2.21-24) Brutus is directly appealing to the plebeians’ morals, more importantly their sense of patriotism. You can clearly see that Brutus wanted to address each plebeians’ love for their city. You can clearly see that each plebeian cares deeply about their city because then they wouldn’t be at Caesar’s funeral trying to figure how their emperor died. Brutus is also attempting to receive empathy from the plebeians , basically saying that he didn't kill Caesar because he was jealous or utterly dislike of Caesar but because he was concerned more about Rome’s future. His main objective with this statement was to make the plebeians feel loved so they wouldn’t be angered with him and understand his side of the…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Appeal and Antony

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What examples of appeals to emotion did Brutus use? What examples did Antony use? Who handled the appeal to emotion better? Explain your answer. Brutus used brotherly speech and affection to win people over as his appeal to emotion . Antony comes in dramatically o the pulpit with Caesar's dead body to with the mobs sympathy and addressed the crowd as "friends" . Antony handled the appeal to emotion better because you could feel the emotion in his speech also he almost cried and with that he won over the crowd…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes, Brutus’s speech is considered to be the better of the two speeches. Yes, Brutus does use a lot of pathos to move the crowd. But Brutus doesn’t use a lot of other aids like ethos and pathos. Antony uses pathos, ethos, and even some logos to appeal to the crowd.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The speech is succinct and balanced stating “But as he [Caesar] was ambitious, I slew him.” Brutus’ lack of emotions reinforces that the assassination was purely for the greater good and not for personal profit. “There is tears for his love, joy for his fortunes and death for his ambition.” Brutus uses rhetorical questions to attempt to justify his actions and whether Caesar’s lust for power threatens Rome’s democratic society. “Had you rather Caesar were living to die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way Brutus uses pathos is very strong. Brutus says how much he loved Caesar but he had to murder him for the better of Rome. Brutus said, “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” Also, Brutus shows his sympathy over Caesar’s death. Brutus said, “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant; I honor him: but, as he was ambitious, I slew him.” Brutus…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony's Use of Rhetoric

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar," William Shakespeare shows the power of rhetoric. Rhetoric is the ability to speak or write effectively. Shakespeare shows this power through Antony, Julius Caesar's best friend. Antony shows this at Caesar's funeral, at which Brutus, one of the conspirators who killed Caesar, allowed him to speak to the public under the condition that he not speak badly of the conspirators. Antony was a powerful speaker and was deeply gifted in the art of rhetoric. He was able to turn the public against the conspirators without breaking his promise to Brutus. Antony did this by using the techniques of ethos, pathos, and logos.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rhetorical appeals

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus’s also said, “Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” which appeals to logos because his is making a logical statement that says Caesar’s death was for the best to Rome’s men freedom. At the end Brutus appeals pathos by saying, “who is there so vile that will not love his country? If any, speak; for him have I offended” Brutus tells the Roman citizen that Caesar deserved what he got because he was too ambitious and would eventually become a much powerful ruler and would make the romans his slave.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Mark Antony must win the support of the Romans by making a speech to them. The two former friends become enemies. They share different beliefs in what is right in their eyes. Brutus wants to take the place of Caesar and become powerful. Antony wants justice for his best friend, Caesar. However, Shakespeare pits Mark Antony’s speech against Brutus’ speech. Antony’s speech is persuasive, and heartfelt. He understands the Romans unlike Brutus. Brutus’ speech is brief and not heartfelt. Mark Antony becomes victorious in winning the hearts of the Romans by having his speech be more rhetoric and effective than Brutus’ speech.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays