Top-Rated Free Essay

Julius Caeser

Better Essays
Subjective bias is at the heart of all representations.
Through the representation of language to manipulate a text, several diverse agendas and interpretations are shaped. Varying representations arise through events, personalities or situations are shaped through contextual form, language features, altering the meaning and creating textual integrity. The composers construction of various mediums allows responders to perceive a text to form their own particular view and depiction of these conflicting perspectives create meaning. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, the persuasion of beliefs surrounding the assassination of Caesar, allow responders to interpret meaning and individual view points. Shakespeare manipulates the conventions of drama and language structure to alter perspectives regarding the events leading up to Caesars assignation.
The conflicting political agendas of Cassius in Julius Caesar demonstrate the relationship between state and citizen and create motifs for actions undertaken throughout the play. Cassius disproval of Caesar running Rome is depicted throughout carefully crafted rhetoric gambits persuading Brutus to join him against Caesar. The fears of Brutus are played upon by Cassius who envies Caesar’s power. “We petty men/ Walk under his huge legs...dishonourable graves.” Emotive language highlights Caesars all-consuming power, the juxtaposition of ‘huge legs’ and ‘petty men’ conveys the assassination as a personal plot and persuades Brutus to join him in his quest for vengeance. The series of words builds up images of jealousy and inferiority. By using faulty reasoning Cassius was able to make Caesar appear to be a tyrant to the people of Rome. This conflicts with Brutus as he is caught in between his love for Rome and his love for Caesar. Cassius’ views on Caesar were conflicting towards the Elizabethan audience as his hatred for the leader opposed supporting views of a monarchical system. Throughout the play Cassius repeatedly express his view that Caesar is a tyrant. His grievances against Caesar are caused in part for the power given to someone he sees as physically and intellectually inferior. In the opening scene, Cassius’, mocking tone denounces Caesar’s success as being due to good luck rather than superiority “Upon what meat doth this our Caesar feed...so great?” It is evident that Cassius is jealous of Caesar and Cassius’ actions throughout the play stem from this. The use of various language forms allows the responder to create meaning from the text and develop their own personal insight into Cassius’ beliefs.
The capacity of language to persuade the public for purposes of power is emphasised in Julius Caesar. In the funeral scene the differing perspectives of Mark Antony, Brutus and the Plebeians are portrayed through the use of language. Brutus relies on reason and logic to explain the reasons behind the assassination. Imperative language ironically makes Brutus to appear as the tyrant he feared Caesar would become “Listen here” “Be silent” “If any speak”. Brutus asserts reason and justifies his actions by stressing his patriotism in the juxtaposition ´not that I love casers less but I love Rome more” Brutus’ logical rationale asserted through personal pronouns ‘I honour him, but he was ambitious, I slew him” this appeals to audience through honesty and reason. His consistent use of intimidating rhetorical questions “would you rather Caesar live and die all slaves...free men?” and symmetrical logical structure clearly presents his views and persuade the audience to reason with Brutus and see the logic in his ways. Brutus’ speech is completely contrasted with Antony’s. Antony addresses crowd using powerful blank verse presenting an antithesis to Brutus. Antony skilfully presents Caesar as consistent and Brutus as not, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious...Brutus is an honourable man” the constant repetition of “honourable man” undermines Brutus’ use of logic and turns Brutus’ arguments against him. Antony uses conspicuous ambiguity regarding Caesar “If so it was a grievous fault” and rhetorical questions “in this did Caesar seem ambitious to further undermine Brutus’ integrity and reason. Both Brutus and Antony manipulate language to enhance their beliefs, through this manipulation conflicting perspectives are created which give the text meaning and allow responders to involve themself into the play and create their own ideas on the assassination.
Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, reflect the idea that many perspectives are created throughout the use of language and neither perspective is right or wrong. The subjectivity of the perspectives is the basis of the play and this gives the text meaning and allows responders to create their own insight into the text.
CONFLICTING PERSPECTIVES ABOUT POLITICAL VIEWS * The capacity of language to persuade the public for purposes of power is emphasised in Julius Caesar. * Brutus and Antony’s conflicting perspectives on the political assassination of Caesar who is portrayed as both hero and putative tyrant. * Shakespeare’s support for the monarchical system * Caesars arrogance and self importance is demonstrated through his hubris where he states in third person “Caesar is more dangerous than he” * When Antony imperatively says “When Caesar says ‘Do this!’ further shows Caesars unchallenged power, authority and confidence. * Perspectives conflict with that of the conspirators. Cassius shows Caesar’s imperfections in his soliloquy. Strong imagery, emotive language ‘How did he shake...his coward lips did their colour fly’

SPEECH * Language is used by Shakespeare to question the manipulative agendas of leaders and to highlight its effectiveness in garnering public support. * Brutus asserts reason and justifies his actions by stressing his patriotism in the juxtaposition ´not that I love casers less but I love Rome more” * Brutus’ logical rationale asserted through personal pronouns ‘I honour him, but he was ambitious, I slew him” this appeals to audience through honesty and reason. * Rhetorical questioning ‘rather Caesar living and die slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?’ * His perspective and connection to the people are diminished by a lack of rhythm, eloquence and the pathos of Mark Antony

* Antony addresses crowd using powerful blank verses catalysing vengeance on the conspirators and nullify opposition * An antitheses to Brutus * Manipulates crowd through emotive language and sardonic irony of “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him. * Connect with emotions of crowd * Represents himself as honest and compassionate this allows Antony to usurp the power the conspirators to cast doubt over Brutus’ credibility. * Demonstrated through repetition of ‘honourable man’ in conjunction with the low modality of ‘if it were so, it was a grievous fault.’ * Further persuades audience to accept his perception of the assassination through antistrophe ‘Brutus says he was ambitious and Brutus is an honourable man’ * The pliable and dynamic shifts of the plebeian’s perspective represented through the exclamation ‘live Brutus live’ to the later “revenge! Let not a traitor live” further emphasises Antonys more skilful use of rhetoric.

* The texts demonstrate the importance of manipulative rhetoric in shaping perception. * The deliberate selection and emphasis on the material which creates different representations that highlights the idea that the truth is not made up of one certainty but various possible interpretations.

* Shakespeare manipulates the convention of drama and language structure to shape acts of representation in Julius Caesar, altering perspectives regarding the event of the assassination of Julius Caesar.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    julius caeser

    • 7476 Words
    • 30 Pages

    Julius Caesar The story of Julius Caesar’s assassination has been told both historically and fictionally. Historical sources focus on the facts of the assassination, while fictionary works focus more on the characters and the drama of the story. Because of the different purposes of the sources, there are many differences between the historical and fictional stories. William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar adds certain details and dramatic elements to make the story more interesting and to make the…

    • 7476 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    julius caeser

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Caesar. In the play about Julius Caesar, Caesar gives a “north star” speech at the capitol. Which shows how constant and how established Caesar is like the north star. The speech shows that Caesar can put his foot down and is not a bandwagoner like the people of Rome, and the conspirators as people who do not take anything under consideration. With this speech, Caesar seals his fate because he knows he will die. Bandwagoners are people who just follow other people and do what they are told…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caeser - Rhetoric

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    act 1 scene 2 of Shakespeare’s Julius Caeser where the power of rhetoric is demonstrated expertly through Cassius while convincing Brutus to betray and murder his long-time friend, Caeser. Cassius’ ability to deceive and take advantage of Brutus through rhetoric is simply unparalleled and truly shows the power of rhetoric to its maximum potential. Cassius demonstrates expertly the power of rhetoric for his own benefit and insecurities by convincing Brutus that Caeser is no greater than either of them…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    single day persuasion isn’t used to stray people from their beliefs or convince them to do or say things for the benefit of a particular group. In Shakespeare’s tragedy “Julius Caesar” persuasion, in the form of ethos and pathos, is used by senate members on others and on themselves in order to achieve the goal of killing Julius Caesar. Early in Act 1 Cassius is trying to convince Brutus that he is someone with good intentions, he says, “Were I a common laughter, ... and after scandal them... then…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    julius caeser essay

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Julius Caesar Speech Essay In act lll of Julius Caesar, a flawless specimen of literature using classical appeals, both Brutus and Mark Antony deliver a speech using the three classical appeals, ethos, pathos and logos at the funeral of Julius Caesar. Both men effectively convey their point to the listeners/readers however; one in particular is exceedingly influential. The more powerful one is by Mark Antony, who uses credibility, emotion, and logic in his speech to induce the crowd at the funeral…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, there were two honorable men who were great persuaders that manipulated the sheep's' (plebeians) mind. Those two orators were Brutus and Antony, and Antony who comes out on top in the end. Brutus and the conspirators first kill Caesar by stabbing him and then explaining to the Romans their reason for doing such 'good' deed. Brutus gets the attention of every Roman in the town and asks them to hear him out before acting and spilling more blood. To start out with, Brutus’s…

    • 511 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    using gestures and skilled rhetoric to his advantage. He responds to subtle cues among both his nemeses and his allies to know exactly how he must conduct himself at each particular moment in order to gain the most advantage. In Both his eulogy for Caeser and the play as a whole, Antony is adept at tailoring…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    julius

    • 406 Words
    • 1 Page

    Details Uploaded: December 28, 2011 Artist: Littlenubnubs Difficulty: Novice Novice Skill Level Steps: 8 Updated: December 28, 2011 P.O.V: Front Favourited: 0 times Interact Leave A Comment Add to Favorites Print Tutorial 9 Loves Artist comments This drawing of Taylor Swift isn't as recognizable as the other one that I drew but nonetheless, it's her and from her Speak Now Tour. This was a request and I decided to use it as a tutorial. This is a fairly simple and basic tutorial to follow…

    • 406 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar Gaius Julius Caesar is considered to be one of the greatest statesman and a Roman general. It is believed that Julius springs his family from the genetic factor Julia, the descendants of Lulus, who was the son of Aeneas, the Trojan prince, and the supposed son of Venus goddess. Caesar, the cognomen springs its origin from an ancestor born by a caesarean section. Caesar was born on 13th July 100 B.C. and died on 15th March 44 B.C. Julius Caesar was the son of Gaius Julius Caesar…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius and Caesar

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    basically Julius Caesar is a huge character in which people looked upon on. Except the conspirators whom wanted him gone. They tried to avoid him from the beginning to not cause the death of him. But as time came and they noticed how everyone wanted him as their king. They became jealous of him. Let’s get to know who the conspirators are and why they did this to Julius Caesar. Was it for jealousy, anger, or was it for something that no one knows. Were the conspirators wrong to kill Julius Caesar…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays