Within the play, a group of characters called the mechanicals actually act out a bastardized version of the story “Pyramus and Thisbe”. While it is meant to be a tragedy with a similar theme of forbidden romance to the overall play, Shakespeare actually makes comic. He does this by making the actors simple workers, who end up being hilariously clumsy and awkward. Perhaps one reason Shakespeare has a play within a play is to emphasize the idea of forbidden romance. Another potential reason is to show a contrast between the happy ending of the main play and the tragic ending of Pyramus and Thisbe
The interesting part of Shakespeare’s portrayal of the Pyramus and Thisbe story is how he turns the tragedy into a comic production. Some think this was meant to be mocking. He may be mocking himself and/or playwrights in general with the pathetic production. He also may be doing the same for actors, who were not thought very highly of during that time. I, however, think there is another possibility; might Shakespeare be giving credit, or a ‘shout out’ to Ovid, who played such a large part in his …show more content…
They differ however in how they use the story. In Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare copies the overall story line but changes most of the details. For example, he includes lovers from two feuding families, but in his play, they are from noble families. On the other hand, in A Midsummer Night’s Dream he turns the story into a plot device in the form of a play-within-the-play. The main points of the story are retained, and it reflects several event in the overall play, but it becomes almost comedic due to the poor acting of the mechanicals. Although the same story plays an important role in both plays, it is used very