top-rated free essay

Julius Caesar Final Essay

By Gaber925 May 15, 2011 1075 Words
Does the threat a person or a county presents justify murdering people who might be innocent? An unknown author once said, “Take risks: if you win, you will be happy; if you lose, you will be wise”. This quote applies to that question and any other risk taking situation there is out there. If the people are guilty, then you’re happy; and if they are innocent, you learn from it and become wiser. It is okay to murder a person(s) if they present a threat to society that could be catastrophic or worse, fatal.

In “Julius Caesar”, a play by Shakespeare, the question of murdering people who present a threat comes into play. In the play Casca says, “Speak, hands, for me” As Casca strikes, the others rise up and stab Caesar (A3 S1 84-85). This is the quote that Casca says before he and the other conspirators kill Caesar. They had been planning the assassination for a while and they got what they wanted. Brutus later says, “… If then that a friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more… ” (A3 S2 21-24). In this speech to the Plebeians, Brutus addresses that he did not kill Caesar out of personal

Madrid 2
rivalry because Caesar was his friend. However, he says he killed Caesar because he loved Rome more and he did it for the good of Rome. Later in the speech Brutus says, “… Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all freemen? As Caesar loved me, I weep for him …” (A3 S2 24-26). Here Brutus is talking about how if Caesar continued being a dictator, all of Rome would be slaves but now they’ll be free; then he says that he weeps for Caesar as much as he loved him. Even though the people of Rome really loved Caesar, Brutus was convinced by Cassius that he was causing a plague upon Rome and that is why Brutus took part in the stabbing. Even though killing Caesar really wasn’t the right decision because the people loved him, Brutus was convinced that he was a threat to society and that’s why he murdered Caesar, which shows that a threat someone presents to society does justify murdering an individual.

In the situation titled “The Soldier’s Dilemma”, a soldier named Dillon sees a woman run onto the road ahead of his squad and possibly plant a bomb then hide. Dillon is then placed in the tough situation to shoot the woman, who could have just planted a bomb, or there is the risk of killing her and she ends up being an innocent person. Dillon definitely should kill the woman because she presents a threat to the group of soldiers. In the short story “The Soldier’s Dilemma”, a couple weeks before, there was an ambush on the same road and many soldiers died. Dillon should shoot the woman because they were in enemy territory and the woman could easily be a part of the guerilla forces. Also, his Sergeant Johnson said, “Don’t take any chances”

Madrid 3
(The Soldiers Dilemma). Therefore, Dillon should listen to his sergeant because the woman does present a threat to the squad. Sergeant Johnson also says, “Better to kill a few of those murdering villagers than to let anymore Americans die” (The Soldier’s Dilemma). Here, Sergeant Johnson is completely right. Even if the woman is a peasant, it is much better to lose one life than to lose the lives of a whole army squad. In this situation the woman presents a big threat to the squad so murdering her is the right thing to do.

In the war in Iraq, there were two leaders named Saddam Hussein and. Saddam presented threats to both their country and the United States. In a biography about Saddam a writer said, “On October 7, 1959, Saddam and others attempted, but failed, to assassinate the prime minister” (Jennifer Rosenberg). The author also wrote, “From 1980 to 1988, Saddam led Iraq in a war against Iran which ended in a stalemate. Also during the 1980s, Saddam used chemical weapons against Kurds within Iraq, including gassing the Kurdish town of Halabja which killed 5,000 in March 1988” (Jennifer Rosenberg). Saddam did many things to harm innocent people and therefore he presented a threat to society. He turned on the Iraqi government and tried to assassinate the prime minister. Later in Saddam's life, “In 1990, Saddam ordered Iraqi troops to take the country of Kuwait. In response, the United States defended Kuwait in the Persian Gulf War” (Jennifer Rosenberg). This is part of what started the conflict with Iraq. Saddam was trying to get greedy and hurt others’ lives and therefore he was a big threat to everyone and the U.S. needed to take action. Also, “On March 19, 2003, the United States attacked Iraq. During the fighting, Saddam fled Baghdad. On December Madrid 4

13, 2003, U.S. forces found Saddam Hussein hiding in a hole in al-Dwar, near Tikrit” (Jennifer Rosenberg). In trial Saddam was sentenced to death. He presented a big threat to society and that is why he was hung on December 30, 2006. It was definitely the right thing to do because of everything he had done throughout the years.

If one presents a threat to a person or country that can be fatal, it is okay to murder them for the sake of the people. “Julius Caesar”, “The Soldiers Dilemma”, and the war with Iraq all justified murdering an individual or individuals because of the treats they presented to the people. If you don’t take a stand against the people presenting threats, the threats that they present will just keep growing and getting worse.

Madrid 5
Work Cited Page
"Risk Quotes, Sayings about Taking a Chance." The Quote Garden - Quotes, Sayings, Quotations, Verses. 1989. Web. 13 Dec. 2010. . Rosenberg, Jennifer. "Saddam Hussein - A Biography of Saddam Hussein." 20th Century History. Web. 14 Dec. 2010. . Shakespeare, William. Julius Caesar. New York, New York: Pocket, 1980-1989. Web. "Soldier's Dilemma -- Lesson Plan, Introductory Activity,Scenario for Shakespeare's Julius Caesar or Other Literature." Writing Resource for Young Authors, Educational Resource Forstudents, Teacher Resource for Home School and Regular Classroomteachers. Web. 14 Dec. 2010. .

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • Julius Caesar Final Exam

    ...Name ____________________________________________JULIUS CAESAR: Final Exam Part One: Multiple Choice: Circle the correct answer. 1. The speeches that Antony and Brutus gave at the funeral are both: a. soliloquies b. asides c. monologues d. dialogues 2. From the events in the play, one can determine that the political mood and behav...

    Read More
  • Julius Caesar Essay

    ...contriver.     Antony is manipulative. In his speech to persuade an emotional crowd to evolve into an angry, hysterical mob, Antony first established friendship and intimacy, addressing the crowd as "friends" followed by "Romans". By doing this, Antony has gained trust from his targeted audience, rather than immediately stressing on the ...

    Read More
  • Julius Caesar Essay

    ...Julius Caesar Idealism v Realism Essay Why do honorable people end up with a downfall for their achievements? William Shakespeare with his knowledge of human nature shows Brutus and Cassius’s behaviors as idealistic and realistic in one of his most tragic plays Julius Caesar. The main theme Shakespeare uses in the play is idealism v realism....

    Read More
  • Julius Caesar Omens Essay

    ...are displayed throughout the Tragedy of Julius Caesar, written by Shakespeare. If these omens are ignored negativity is often the only outcome for the character as demonstrated in the play. Some of these omens include Caesar ignoring Calpurnia’s unpleasant dream and his servant’s simple warning. Cassius disagrees with Casca’s statement of ...

    Read More
  • Julius Caesar Essay Question

    ...DRAMA: SECTION- A WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE: JULIUS CAESAR Either 1. METELLUS CIMBER     Most high, most mighty, and most puissant Caesar,     Metellus Cimber throws before thy seat     An humble heart,--     Kneeling CAESAR     I must prevent thee, Cimber.     These couchings and these lowly cou...

    Read More
  • Julius Caesar Villain Essay

    ...Julius Caesar Essay A cruelly malicious person who is involved in or devoted to wickedness or crime, scoundrel. This is the definition of of a villain or in other words Julius Caesar. Throughout the times, historians argue that Julius Caesar was one of the worlds greatest villains. He is depicted as being a villain as he slaughtered one third of...

    Read More
  • Julius Caesar Essay

    ...is difficult to be successful when their flaws get in their way. Caesar was an egotistical and oblivious man, and his flaws lead to his assassination. Brutus was a very noble leader, but he was too naïve and idealistic. Cassius was very intelligent, but he was over dramatic. His leadership is cut off because he always agreed with Brutus. Howev...

    Read More
  • Julius Caesar Essay

    ...By Friends Julius Caesar once wrote, “Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt” (Caesar, Book III, Ch. 18), which means, “Men willingly believe what they wish” (Ramage, 442). This is apparent in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. The conspirators who assassinated Julius Caesar convinced themselves that killing Caesar was...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.