Preview

Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
641 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives Analysis
Julius Caesar – Exam notes

Julius Caesar (Act 1 Scene 1 – and other aspects of the text)

Conflicting Perspectives. What are they? I’m here to explain to you the conflicting perspectives of Shakespeare’s ‘Julius Caesar’ and Sacha Baron Cohen’s ‘The Dictator’. Both texts explore conflicting perspectives which are conveyed through their leading characters. Within these two textual forms, Shakespeare and Cohen use linguistic features such as emotive language, simile and prose to delve into the motives of each character and what has caused them to contradict each other.

The opening scene of ‘Julius Caesar’ introduces Flavius and Murellus (tribunes) who are angry at the commoners on the street for celebrating the return of Caesar after
…show more content…
This is highlighted in his funeral speech in Act 3. Brutus speaks in prose to the Plebeians and tries to present a reasonable argument for killing Caesar. He believes that by killing Caesar he is doing his country a great deed and that it is not for any personal hatred for Caesar but for his love of Rome. “Not that I love Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more”. His motives are patriotic and for that he is presented as ‘an honourable man’ and given leeway for his murderous actions. Contrary to Brutus’ honourable motives, Cassius conspires to murder Caesar to satisfy his envy for him. He’s jealous! This is conveyed during Act 1 Scene 2 when Cassius almost loses his temper, describing Caesar as a ‘sick girl’. Cassius is shocked that someone who can become sick and ask for help can also be viewed as a God. “It doth amaze me; a man of such feeble temper should so get the start of the majestic world and bear the palm alone”. Cassius’ jealousy of Caesar is outlined when he refers to Caesar as a Colossus “Like a Colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs”. Shakespeare’s use of simile to describe Caesar ‘like a Colossus’ reveals Cassius’ negative attitude and jealousy towards Caesar. Through the use of linguistic features such as dramatic/emotive language, prose and simile, Shakespeare is able to differentiate between the conflicting perspectives of Brutus and Cassius in his play

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s interpretation of Julius Caesar’s assassination titled, Julius Caesar, a man named Cassius is attempting to get the help and alliance of a fellow Roman named Brutus in the conspiracy of assassinating the Roman leader. He accomplishes this in constructed and detailed monologues to persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy. In each of Cassius’ monologues, Cassius strategically uses appeals and rhetorical devices to ultimately give a successful and persuasive speech to his audience, Brutus.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By how my classmates used a scene from The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, my views regarding my thesis were challenged. Meaning, my views were challenged, when my classmates used a scene from the play, and showed a form of betrayal. From my previous words you can see my way of thinking…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cassius's perspective is very much that Caesar is a mere man and no better than any other Roman. 'I was born as free as Caesar, so were you.' His recollection of the time he saved Caesar from drowning had a great influence on his view on Caesar, “Tis true, this god did shake.” He ironically utilizes the term ‘god’ as he was astonished that a man of such physical weakness can now have the reputation of greatness, “'Ye gods, it doth amaze me / A man of such a feeble temper should / So get the start of the majestic world.” Cassius’ soliloquy exposes his deceit and manipulation, “Well, Brutus, thou art noble; yet I see Thy honourable metal may be wrought from that it is disposed.” His play on words showing his belief that he will be able to manipulate Brutus; honourable “mettle,” as if it were heated metal being changed into something new and finally target Caesar with his own loved companion. There is an element of personal jealousy in Cassius. It is evident in his metaphorical language:, 'Why, man, he doth bestride the narrow world / Like a Colossus and we petty men' His simile of ‘Colossus’ also produces imagery of the flawed Caesar. Cassius represents Caesar as a tyrant. Cassius takes it personally and will act on the matter. Therefore, through a variety of literary techniques, embedded in various character convictions and opposing views, Shakespeare is able to blur…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    You are to produce a contribution to an online HSC Tutorial. You are to record and upload an answer to the question below. It is to be no longer than seven minutes and no less than five minutes.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar, a historical tragedy appeals to an audience fearing Elizabeth 1 imminent death without an heir and consequence civil war, religious conflict and external threats.  embodies his values in distinctive, engaging, contrasting characters and their relationship with each other…

    • 1311 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Act I Q A

    • 1360 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Questions and answers have been provided for you. Your job is to cite the lines from the play that…

    • 1360 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Cicero states: “men may construe things after their fashion”, in the midst of subjective conflicting perspectives upon a certain personality, what would you draw from it? William Shakespeare lends this thought to the audiences of his time as well as ours through the play, Julius Caesar. Was Julius Caesar really the noblest man that ever lived, an ambitious tyrant, or both? Enhanced by the personal values of Cassius and Brutus, we can discover that studying the conflicting perspectives of Caesar and his power can bring us closer to the truth of his character whilst cultivating a more diverse and provocative insight to Shakespeare’s context and audience.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Power is a theme that has dominated mankind since history was recorded. The assassination of Julius Caesar, ruler of the greatest empire the world has ever known, was a result of such a struggle for power. The foundations of Shakespeare's 'Julius Caesar' are power relationships which dominate the liaisons between characters of opposing sex, classes, and ambitions. Even in the historical context, Rome in 44 BC, the height of the Roman Republic, predisposes the play to a complex tangle of power conflicts. As the power of prominent characters builds tension, ambitions develops, and thus manipulation arises. Struggles of authority and dominance are evident between the characters in 'Julius Caesar', through Shakespeare's…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar presents conflicting perspectives of Julius Caesar’s death. Shakespeare employs a variety of dramatic and language techniques to enhance the contrasting views of the assassination. Similarly President Bush’s Address at the 5th Anniversary of 9/11 and the article War is not a solution for Terrorism by Howard Zinn, deals with differing views of US occupation in Iraq.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Conflicting perspectives are often the outcome of diverse and contrasting views of ones personality, event or situation. This is evident is the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, as Caesar's personality develops and the diverse perspective of his death in ensuring civil war create conflict within the play. Raymond Briggs' picture book The Tin-Pot Foreign General and the Old Iron Woman generates an understanding of the injustice of Falkland's war through contrasting the perspectives of both the political leaders at the time and the Falkland Islanders. Through the use of dramatic, language and visual techniques both Shakespeare and Briggs have shown how differences in opinion can offer a understanding and ideas of certain personalities, situations or events.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jealousy In Julius Caesar

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The character Cassius in the tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare constantly reflects palpable jealousy. In Act I Scene II, Cassius claims “I was born free as Caesar; so were you:/We both have fed as well, and we both/Endure the winter’s cold as well as he…”(Shakespeare, lines 5-7); and feels king Caesar does not deserve superiority over him. In this scene, Cassius is pointing out to Brutus that he and Cassius deserve the power to lead Rome more than Caesar. In order to prove these points, Cassius shares three stories with Brutus in his speech: one of when he and Caesar had a swimming contest; another when he saw Caesar sickly and frail after a fever; and lastly one where Caesar again is portrayed as a weak and sickly man. In the monologue by Cassius directed at Brutus, Cassius uses paradox, self-heroic word choice and similes throughout three separate stories to give examples of Caesar’s weaknesses. Cassius’ main goal becomes to portray Caesar as any other man; and to rationalize killing the king to gain power for (what he…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Flaws

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Written by Shakespeare more than one thousand five hundred years after Julius Caesar’s death, Julius Caesar, Shakespeare’s well-known tragedy, is unique in that it contains two tragic characters, the senator Brutus and emperor Caesar. A play in five acts, Julius Caesar attempts to portray the assassination of Caesar, at that time victorious over Pompey’s sons, and the civil war that follows, culminating in the establishment of the Second Triumvirate. Although Caesar meets his end comparatively early in the third act, both Brutus and Caesar are adequately portrayed as men of high repute who, through flawed actions and decisions, meet an untimely end. In short, both are tragic heroes.…

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fuller really stresses in this book that historians and those in classical studies have two very different views of the man that was Julius Caesar.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar's Dilemma

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is a dilemma based on Julius Caesar. Caesar is a Roman general who is considered a king, even without his crown. Antony is a devoted friend of Caesar, who pairs with Octavius, Caesar’s nephew, after his death. Caesar considers himself an autocrat, which isn’t suitable or liked by the Romans. A noble Roman whom all of Rome adores including Caesar, Brutus, plots against Caesar’s dictatorship. Many other people were involved in the plot against Caesar including Cassius, Casca and Decius. They assassinated Caesar, who trusted them dearly, on the ides of March. All people of Rome were happy except one, Antony. Antony joins hands with Octavius and plans to avenge Caesar’s death. This leads to a…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays