Shakespeare vs History
Every writer tries to make his/her interpretations and to show different sides of characters. Even historical person can be changed by an author. For example “Julius Caesar” written by William Shakespeare. In spite of the fact that there are not a lot of differences between historical Julius Caesar and Shakespearean one ,still there exist some Shakespeare’s interpretations and different opinions about him. There exist some facts in history about Julius Caesar that were not mentioned in Shakespeare’s play. First of all it must be described what kind of a person Julius Caesar really was? Historical Julius Caesar. When he was young he was really obstinate but really clever at the same time. He loved drinking and women really much, but then he totally changed his lifestyle and he became a strong soldier. Once he was arrested by the pairates. During the captivity Caesar behaved as he was a leader of the pairates.Julius Caesar was menacing them to punish strictly and he did it. When he returned to Rome he blowed all the pairates on the crosses. He was a really strong person. Another affirmation that he was a powerful person is one fact. Once he decided to become the main preast when there were elections. His words to his mother were “if I don’t return as the main priest I will never return”. When he had his main goal, he did everything possible and impossible to achieve it. He had his opinions and never changed his principles. Cicero did not love Caesar, moreover he had really bad relationship with him but still he always recognized Julius Caesar as one of the most talented person. “Where can one find a person who has so wonderful talent of speaking, so wonderful vocabulary a person who can make so clever remarks about everything” – tells Cicero about Julius Caesar. As some historians say he had no fear . This was a person who was ready to do everything for his goals and Rome. Shakespearian...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document