Julian Of Norwich Analysis

Julian of Norwich
The name 'Julian' comes from the Church of St. Julian at Norwich. She is an English anchor and a very important mystical and Christian theologian. In her work titled "Revelation of Divine Love", Julian faces an evil problem. As a Christian, she asserted that nothing happened with the fate of opportunity because everything was through the distant view and wisdom of God. Therefore, God does everything and states that God is Almighty, All-Wise and Most Merciful. So, everything he did was done perfectly. She repeats this conclusion because God is innocent or all He does is peaceful. Indeed, God does not change His purpose in any matter and the Trinity is always satisfied with what He has done.
Julian Norwich admits that she does
However, those who deceive others are also deceiving themselves, and this self-deception reduces the trust of many people and avoids any longing for higher powers. George writes in his article entitled "Problem of Evil and Injustice Problems" on the problem of the existence of evil and suffering in the world when one considers the characteristics of the Creator's world aimed at maximizing. These features include opportunities for people to do well.
George writes a book on religious philosophy. This includes "New Perspectives on Old-Old Religions", which contain George's ideas and analysis on the logic and philosophy of religious beliefs. In this paper, George presents the strong defense of Theism, which includes the answer to Theism's argument, such as the existence of evil and suffering in the world. He also discusses the divine attributes of this book, and his beliefs are all separate
Aquinas, who is the father of Thomism, also a classic supporter of natural theology which he argued the reasons why God exist. Aquinas think that if we question the proving of the existence of God, it will tied to the questions of how and from what we can recognize God. He thought that it is necessary to show His existence can be known without reliance on faith and scriptures first, before he undertakes to prove the existence of God by reason. But His existence is not self-evident and does require argumentation. Therefore, he is clear opposing The Ontological Argument of St. Anselm due to the argument he said that God’s existence is not self-evident. Aquinas thought that there are at least three approaches that can strengthen the truth about God philosophically: the cause path; ways of rejection, and the way of perfection (or transcendence). Aquinas uses each of these methods, for example, in his treatment of what can be said truly about God. Aquinas did not think that God could be the first in a temporary sense because God existed beyond time. (Brown, 2017) Aquinas also thinks that there are two kind of truths about God which