Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Julian Assange, Hero or Criminal: My Reasons for Supporting Him

Good Essays
836 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julian Assange, Hero or Criminal: My Reasons for Supporting Him
n the past weeks Julian Assange has been seen as everything from a folk hero to a traitor who according to one local anonymous resident “deserves to be hanged.” Sadly, with very few exceptions people are misunderstanding the idea behind what he has done and the backlash it has created.
Advertisement

First and foremost nothing he disclosed has threatened a single American soldier’s life or given radical terrorists any more of a target than we as the aggressor (nation) have not already done for ourselves. Secondly, for those of you who are bent on assigning him traitor status you should remember your oaths as military men, and if you are not or have never been military you really need a refresher on the Constitution.

The military man has an oath that starts with this line, “I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…” I will give you the definition of enemy, “One that is antagonistic to another; especially: one seeking to injure, overthrow, or confound an opponent…” The question must now be asked, if by initiating force against a sovereign nation our government creates peril for the people of this nation are they not by default a "domestic" enemy?

Now let’s quickly look at the Constitution again, the First Amendment says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Now it has been argued for over 200 years that the first amendment should not protect people who speak against the Government of the United States, and yet, that was the VERY intent of the founders in forging this PRIMARY Amendment, to assure the people have a VOICE when their government goes too far! If we the people actually looked at what our founders thought we would soon see that our current system of government is neither Constitutional, nor is it beneficial to any liberty other than state granted.

Both Jefferson and Paine knew and understood the dangers of a government that held secrets and disallowed its citizens verbal or printed input. All of the founders understood the need for a FREE press and FREE speech, and even though Assange is not a US citizen what he has printed SHOULD not be made illegal or banned in the United States.

"There are rights which it is useless to surrender to the government and which governments have yet always been found to invade. These are the rights of thinking and publishing our thoughts by speaking or writing; the right of free commerce; the right of personal freedom. There are instruments for administering the government so peculiarly trustworthy that we should never leave the legislature at liberty to change them. The new Constitution has secured these in the executive and legislative department, but not in the judiciary. It should have established trials by the people themselves, that is to say, by jury. There are instruments so dangerous to the rights of the nation and which place them so totally at the mercy of their governors that those governors, whether legislative or executive, should be restrained from keeping such instruments on foot but in well-defined cases. Such an instrument is a standing army." --Thomas Jefferson to David Humphreys, 1789. ME 7:323

"An avidity to punish is always dangerous to liberty. It leads men to stretch, to misinterpret, and to misapply even the best of laws. He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself." --Thomas Paine, First Principles of Government, 1795

The pursuit of liberty and freedom requires at times actions that are seen by those who worship at the alter of big government as wrong, this pursuit requires that people be slapped in the face and forced to view their own sins, it requires that our governments illegal actions be laid bare so that all may see. In this case, these documents show the evil wrought upon the innocents of Iraq and Afghanistan for the purpose of securing financial gains by both Bush and Obama. So hate Assange for what he has done, but don’t tell me about this unless you enjoy washing your hands in the innocent blood of 200,000+ thousand civilians…

I for one will continue to support true liberty at the whatever cost, for my pursuit of liberty, regardless of my "enemies" view of that is a good one, the true evil here being the support of a government or organization whose sole goal is the oppression of thought and speech.

For more information and insight you cannot and will not see on FOX, CNN, NBC or any of the other organizations guided by our government subscribe!

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    With the bitter wounds of British tyranny still stinging, the Founding Fathers thought up the first amendment. Democracy flourishes only when freedoms to express views, both political and those of other concerns, are guaranteed. What happens, however, when your own government seizes and destroys these rights, in its attempt to censor the public 's pursuit of political knowledge. The Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) court case brings forth this question and many more, as Citizens United, a nonprofit organization, was challenged in their attempt to broadcast "Hillary: the movie," by the FEC. The verdict, which was ruled in favor of Citizens United, deemed the film an act of the organization 'a first amendment right to free speech. Correct in their ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the abolition of restrictions…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For anyone to place a limit on an American's right to express or suspend one's right's, is to be very dubious in being an American themselves! "Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties." (John Milton, 1644) in that quote, Senator Robert M. La Follette uses it to defend his right to speak out against the war. Furthermore, for the right for the citizens of this country to discuss issues without fear.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The founding fathers of America believed in religious freedom, and the right to sue without prosecution, was mandatory for our nation to be free and open minded. Many of these beliefs are solely presented in the 1st amendment. For instance: Thomas Jefferson states in the first part of the one and only sentence in the first paragraph with “Whereas Almighty God hath created the mind free; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments or burthens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness...”. Pretty much, in latent terms, he is implying in this transcript is that we were given the right…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this case well no he didn’t do. 2) Next is concealment, this one he did do by compiling mass amounts of paperwork, and case files from not only the U.S. government, but other companies and governments as well. 3) The third is violation of trust, or abuse of power, and trust. This one is a little tricky because of the law that states on the theft, compiling and use of government documents. He had the power to view these documents and the trust from the government to see such thing so when he went out on a limb and published those in a webpage format then he violated this rule, or element. The other thing is that he is NOT a citizen of the U.S. therefore the first amendment right would not apply to him. Because of this; it is an American document, and doctrine. So implies the Espionage act which he falls under and has violated. So the final question in this topic is he a criminal, well yes he is because of the amount of data, and the amount of sensitive information that he and his team has exposed. White collar crime yes because he leaked in cyber form information that could cause harm, and damages to a nation, person, or group. The tricky part is the prosecution of this case because of the international retaliation act, and the whistleblowers law at here in the U.S. both of these can be seen as a a way to allow him to continue processing…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    APUSA Case Study

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” The Establishment clause for the First Amendment says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”,…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (http://www.law.cornell.edu).…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self-interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power. Habeas Corpus is written in the constitution as a right of the people and should be a safeguard to protect all accused persons, but many presidents have found ways not to enforce the right. In history the writ of habeas corpus has been challenged by many president from Lincoln to most recently Bush with abuse of power by the president. I will exam whether the president goes against the constitution to protect the safety of its citizens in a time of war or is it an abuse of power because the president is the commander and chief. Is the president acting on behalf of the people or is it a personal agenda.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, the first amendment is taken advantage of in many ways. Many people express that they can say whatever they please because they have the Freedom of Speech. They might burn the USA flag, make a racist remark, or some other kind of action, but what they do not realize is that this may hurt people. The First Amendment should be limited so that individuals can speak their mind so long as it does not hurt other people, or violates their rights.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment guarantees “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press.” The freedom of speech, press, and religion have been pillars of the United States and other Democratic nations who knew the need to have these rights guaranteed. This idea was a major element of the Enlightenment period, the thoughts of John Locke, Jean Rousseau, Montesquieu, and Voltaire would be incorporated into the Constitution which included Freedom of Speech as a Human Right. Schenck v United States rules that the First Amendment stands for all speech as long as it doesn’t cause a “Clear and Present Danger.” No laws have been placed to decrease opinion.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Francis Mejia Period 4 Many parts of the United States Constitution can be interpreted in different ways. This makes it difficult to make decisions on cases because of the many possible ways to look at what is constitutional and what is not. In every court decision, The Supreme Court must carefully analyze and interpret the amendments to the Constitution and apply them. The first Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” One controversial case involving the rules of the First Amendment was Snyder v. Phelps in 2010.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    First, Julian Assange’s creation of WikiLeaks informed the public about the possibility of transparent governments. This new perspective on the function of government revolutionized what people thought of information that was published and their desire for these leaks to know what was actually going on in their government. These ideas and desires were new to many people and Julian Assange was the gadfly that caused progress in this stagnant discipline. In addition, Julian Assange’s publication of classified U.S. government war documents from Bradley Manning also acted as a gadfly on a slightly different issue. The publication of these documents caused the public to desire more of something that before the publication they didn’t even know they wanted. These actions showed the world its need for whistleblowers in all governments to expose the dirty details of what they do without the public’s knowledge or approval. Julian Assange again acted as a gadfly to wake this dormant field and influenced both people to desire a greater flow of information and other citizens to become whistleblowers, to provide the public with this information. Lastly, Julian Assange’s biggest feat was not forcing some small level of transparency on large governments by taking matters into his own hands, but rather forcing the topic of free speech to…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Vote Dbq

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “For example, the First Amendment prohibits Congress from making laws infringing on religious freedom and our freedom of speech, it does not say, "all citizens have the right to freedom of speech and religion". But, you would not say that it does not guarantee those freedoms. This shows that the constitution can guarantee a right without explicitly stating it and effectively proves that argument invalid.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In America, we are founded upon the rules and guidelines provided by our Constitution, but those rules and guidelines are constantly open to your own interpretation. When certain conflicts arise, we turn to our Constitution for admonition. But where do the provisions of our Constitution end? In the articles “Texas v. Johnson: Majority Opinion” and “American Flag Stands for Tolerance”, the issue of whether or not the First Amendment allows for people to use the burning of the American flag as a form of protest—but one does it better than the other.…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment allows for the freedom of the press, and presents a shield of protection for journalists. It also gives the public their rights to the truth, and the journalist’s freedom to seek and report the truth. However, corporate business interests can often conflict with the use of the First Amendment and affect a journalist’s ethical commitment to it. This is portrayed in All the President’s Men, Shattered Glass, and Absence of Malice. The First Amendment of the Bill of Rights, U.S. Constitution states: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment states that there is to be a separation of state and religion. The founding fathers of this country wrote the amendments however, they did not follow what they wrote. They opened meeting with prayer. The public schools said the Our Father prayer and also in the morning they had a bible reading. Until one person made the decision that it was a violation of her first amendment rights. Now it is a violation of the 1st amendment.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays