Preview

Julia Gillard's Apology Of Forced Annoy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
281 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julia Gillard's Apology Of Forced Annoy
The shameful practice of forced adoption was enforced especially during the 1960s in which free love and drug culture was becoming increasingly popular. To this end, an apology was given to the people directly affected by this injustice in an effort to open a dialogue on the issue and acknowledge the pain and suffering caused as a result. Throughout the apology, Julia Gillard uses a variety of techniques to the convey the sincerity of the message and to successfully speak on behalf of the Australian people. Gillard continuously states, “…. we say sorry”, which uses utilises both repetition and inclusive language in order to not only emphasis on the seriousness of the issue, but to invoke sense of responsibility to the issue. Gillard also states,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Leesa Limir Case Memoir

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The first time Leesa Meldrum ever wanted a baby was when she was just eight years old. She was a young girl standing in an airport, watching a mother carrying her baby. 40 years of age at the time, Leesa Meldrum is a single woman who was denied IVF treatment because of her relationship status. Ms Meldrum was devastated at the fact that she was never going to be able to have her own child. Leesa’s doctor, John Mcbain was highly sympathetic towards Leesa and her inability to have a child. Leesa Meldrum had her rights infringed as she was denied IVF treatment because she was a single woman. The groups that had their rights infringed were single or lesbian women. Ms Meldrum’s…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay the author, Becky Birtha discusses the struggles and hard ships that many gay couples face when they try to adopt children. The big question discussed in this essay was, should same-sex couples have the same right as heterosexual couples when it comes to adopting children. Throughout the essay Birtha points out key facts that disrupt the thought that same-sex couple’s children are more likely to turn out homosexual themselves. She dishevels this by pointing out a study done that shows children of a heterosexual couple is more aggressive and negative when compared to those of a homosexual couple. She ends the essay by pointing out that there are roughly 134,000 children in foster-care in the United States waiting to be adopted. On her final note she applauds the AAP for recognizing that children should grow up with parents that can love and care for them regardless of their sexual orientation.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Noel Pearson Summary

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Pearson’s speech, the criticism of John Howard, who was at the time the Prime Minister, throughout the speech shows the idea that the past Australian Governments had made a mistake in treating Aboriginal Australians in the past, and that modern day government is trying to forget that past because of the guilt and shame it had caused the Australian government in the past. Pearson directly quotes comments made by John Howard during a radio interview, but uses these comments to emphasise his own key arguments rather than support those being made by Howard. By using quotes from other sources he broadens the scope of his argument and makes his own argument less of a personal crusade. Pearson also focuses on National Identity and determining “who we are”. Pearson acknowledges the current debate of National Identity by making reference to the “hot button issue” about “the guilt about Australia’s colonial Identity”. The extended metaphor of button pressing and the cliché “You would not need to be a political genius” stresses the “great electoral resonance” of the National Identity debate. Another technique Pearson applies is the use of inclusive language in his speech. This is cleverly woven into the speech by repeated references to “our nation” and the action that “we” have to take to correct the injustices of the past. This facilitates Pearson’s depiction of Aboriginal rights being a social, political, legal and religious concern for the nation as a whole and thus presents Pearson’s view on National Identity and the global perception of “who we are”. The past shows that Australia as a nation…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It might take us a while to come up with questions as we are discussing as a group. I would like to apologize if this has cause you any inconvenience. Also, you might want to take a look at our thesis for now.…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Henry and Bee

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What if you were adopted? What if your own mother didn’t want you? How would you feel? Good morning/ Afternoon Students and Mrs Barrett- Brown. Today i will be evaluating the documentary of "Henry and Bee". These questions reflect on year twelves understanding of the values of belonging and not belonging. These questions also reflect on what has happened throughout Bee King’s life. The concept of belonging is essential in our lives as it brings about acceptance and connection to a person, group or place. Bee King is a hardworking Aboriginal woman who was removed from her mother at birth. As a teenager, Bee was brought up in a white family. Throughout her childhood she always felt isolated and out of place. She felt like she didn’t belong. Bee King set out to find and reconnect with her birth parents. It was no easy search and eventually she tracked down her mother and father. After rejection was replaced by hope a whole new world opened for Bee when she re-established a relationship with her father, Henry. So as I connect belonging to the story of Henry and Bee, consider these questions, and why Henry and Bee should become a prescribed text for the Board of Studies.…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the ‘Introduction’ the editor Carmel Bird accentuates her own sympathetic attitude towards the inhumane treatment of the members of the Stolen Generation. Bird’s value of compassion and egalitarianism challenges and compels us to form our own voice concerning the Aborigines and agree with view that the Australian government must apologies and take action for reconciliation. Carmel Bird uses highly emotive languages, which powerfully demonstrate her emotive appeal to the reader’s sense of sympathy and compels the audience to emotionally react and rectify the wrongs committed against the stolen children. She ends with the short imperative, “Listen to their voices”, which illustrates that it is a moral duty of our generation to understand the pains and continuing cries of agony of the Indigenous people. Her emphatic tone and sympathetic personal voices allows us to gain insight into the common voice of white Australians for reconciliation with the Aboriginal community.…

    • 812 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Noel Pearson, one of Australia’s most influential Aboriginal leaders, delivered his speech to a highly distinguished academic audience at a time when Australia was struggling with “moral and political turbulence” regarding “guilt about Australia’s colonial history”. Pearson expresses his own thoughts on Aboriginal reconciliation and the necessary steps that need to…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Literature is used as a medium to evoke self-reflection in an individual, the responders are forced to reconsider core values in which they live by. Robert gray explores the misplaced values of Australian society, suggesting that the focus has changed to materialism, personal gratification, consumerism and technological advancement. Through his exploration of the aesthetics of myopia and decay, which occur across both his poems, “North coast town” and “ Flames and Dangling wire” Gray forces the responder to see the dire situation of the world as he does, engaging them in a process of self-reflection. The deteariation of Australian society and its decaying cultural identity is due to the misplacement of core values.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Noel Pearson’s “An Australian History for us all” in late 1996, emphasises the significance of context, audience and purpose in determining a speech. Pearson’s speech challenges PM Howard’s reluctance to apologise for the past colonial mistreatment of Australia’s indigenous- at a University Club dinner. “I fear that I am in danger of indulging in agonising navel- gazing about who we are.” Pearson’s piercing sarcasm and antagonising tone satirises that those who seek reconciliation and who do not share the same “black armband view” of Aboriginal history as Howard, are publicly seen as culturally over- indulging and self-absorbed. The speaker further contrasts popular perceptions in Australian culture- where he describes those who believe “the victims should get over it,” and those who are “willing to alleviate your present condition.” Pearson effectively contrasts both groups in society to reflect the moral infidelities of the former group in the modern context. Pearson’s aggressive tone and wide vocabulary lulls his well-informed, educated…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Noel Pearson

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Noel Pearson’s speech, ‘An Australian History for us All,’ explores the divides between our community and the issues that prevent us as a nation from achieving reconciliation. Ultimately, throughout his exordium Pearson is excessively humble, ‘it is my honour to have been invited… Alas, I cannot promise my teacher’s rigour ,’ this diminution of his prominent political position equalises Pearson with his audience. He successfully characterises himself as being selflessly modest, a successful tool in capturing our attention, his choice to do this in the exordium is also an example of kairos, his appealing attitude is naturally attractive, guaranteeing our fixated attention throughout the duration of his speech. Pearson additionally employs a variety of quotes to both enforce his credibility and portray society’s ignorant attitude towards reconciliation. We see this when he quotes Professor Bill Stanner, the ‘Great Australian Silence,’ becomes a metaphor of our refusal to address the Aboriginal struggle on a national level, objectifying the Australian nation as absent minded. Furthermore, Pearson makes noticeable appeals to pathos and logos, encouraging an emotional and logical response identifiable by all of us. Pearson in his battle for reconciliation, provides syllogistic reasoning and structure on solving the inherent ‘guilt’ issue, ‘it is not about guilt. It is about opening our hearts a little bit… and to have an open and generous heart…means that when you acknowledge the wrongs of the past, you might try to do so ungrudgingly… there must be some respect for that.’ Additionally, the inclusive pronouns that Pearson employs in this statement make his proposed solution exclusive, applying to both indigenous and non indigenous peoples as such he unites his audience, generating logos through the universal nature and structural flow of his statement. Additionally, Pearson goes on to compare the reasoning he provides to the internationally notorious issue of Jewish…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Blackrock Essay

    • 2399 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The marginalisation of women is barely acknowledged in Australian society even today. Women, by law, have equal rights and status to men in Australia, presenting an egalitarian image. Despite this fact, detrimental attitudes towards women in society are still prevalent, portraying them as mere…

    • 2399 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Module B Speeches

    • 1177 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In his speech, Noel Pearson addresses the need to acknowledge the past mistreatment of Australian Aboriginals. As an Indigenous Australian politician, Pearson gave his speech at the Chancellor’s Club Dinner in the University of Western Sydney to advance equality of Aborigines. Pearson quickly introduces his purpose, “our popular understanding of the colonial past is central to the moral and political turbulence we are still grappling with as Australians”. The illustrative use of turbulence is used to highlight the prevalence of past disharmonies and he uses the inclusive pronoun “we” as a synecdoche for all Australians to unify the audience. By directly quoting authorities such as John Howard and Bill Stanner, Pearson supplements his ethos and strengthens his case by evaluating both sides of the situation. The metaphor, “cult of forgetfulness” has negative connotations in order to challenge the common social mindset regarding the recognition of the past and induce a desire for change. Pearson effectively uses a cumulative list, “You have taken from us not just our land and not just all of the icons of Indigenous Australia…” to illustrate past injustices. The diction is divisive between Indigenous and European Australians, but deliberate emphasis is placed on the past tense to suggest hope for the future. Thus Pearson…

    • 1177 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paul Keating

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Keating’s position as Prime Minister establishes ethos, allowing him to speak on behalf of the Australian people. Inclusive language establishes a link between the Unknown Solider and Australia; accomplished by binary opposites “from the city or the bush” encompassing all the possibilities of who the Unknown Soldier was, blurring any distinction between male, female, civilian and soldiers. The use of collective nouns “we … us … our” creates connectedness within all people of his audience, sharing the same grieving process encompassed by war.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    faith Bandler

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Faith Bandler uses a variety of rhetorical techniques in Faith, Hope and Reconciliation to portray her memorable message of equality. Bandler’s speech explores the prejudice that Aborigines had to endure, and encourages the reconciliation process to move faster. She opens her speech with separate acknowledgments to “the Indigenous people of Illawarra” and “Lord Mayor, Evelyn Scott, Linda Burney.” This highlights the division between races and subtly introduces her topic of reconciliation. She uses inclusive language to reveal “not what is in it for me, but what is in it for us”, and this is memorable as she is choosing not to divide, instead indicating the benefits of reconciliation to not just Indigenous Australians, but to all. This is unlike Noel Pearson, whose acerbic attack on John Howard’s politics was most memorable, sarcastically stating that Howard “might care to read Robert Hughes rather than the opinion polls” to “comprehend how we might deal with our history”. Bandler was an unwavering campaigner for equal rights in the 1960s, and was integral in making the 1967 Referendum a memorable success. She reminisces on how she and other activists had “lived, breathed, struggled... climbed”, where the cumulative listing emphasizes the hardships that Aborigines had to endure, as well as…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Society has often advanced quicker than the Legal system and often the Legal system tends to lag behind or sometimes has to tend to societal values. An area that the legal system seems to be addressing with respects to societal values is through recognising and protecting the changing nature of the family. The Australian Legal system has been moderately effective in recognising and protecting the changing nature of the family, through various legislation, and common law the Legal system has effectively been able to recognise and protect the changing nature of the family in regards to key areas such as de facto relationships, same sex marriages, rights of the children, divorce and adoption as well as recognising multiple different types of relationships in the country. However there have been some ineffective stances of the Australian legal system in recognizing and protecting the changing nature of the family for example statistics highlighting that one third of children in separated families never seeing their fathers as well as the inability for same sex couples to get married.…

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays