Preview

Judicial Review U S Supreme Court S Main Power

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1489 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Judicial Review U S Supreme Court S Main Power
<html><head></head><body><p>In a nation of democratic governance, the United States has unquestionably succeeded in its own development and potency since the establishment of the Constitution. The United States was founded in hopes of having a truly free, full functioning society. In order to achieve such a goal, the framers of this country drafted the Constitution brilliantly and attentively. With the creation of the three branches, Legislative, Executive, and Judicial, the Constitution also created checks and balances, the capability for each branch to check the power of the others. To ensure the continuing proficiency of our democratic nation and "checks and balances" system, it is crucial to equalize the branches by separating, and equally distributing power among the three branches. However, before 1803, the judicial branch was lacking such said power over the legislative and executive branches. It was not until the case of Marbury v. Madison that Chief Justice Marshall justified the power of judicial review to the judiciary branch, finally obtaining equal leverage among the legislative and executive branches. With the implementation of judicial review, the U.S. Supreme Court has jurisdiction and authority to strike down law, overturn executive acts, and legally bind a public official to properly carry out constitutional duties. Indisputably, the practice of judicial review is the main power of the United States Supreme Court to date.</p>
<p>Many claim that judicial review was never "spelled" out in the Constitution; however, Chief Justice John Marshall saw the controversy of Marbury v. Madison as an unacceptable instance of unconstitutional applied laws. In Marbury v. Madison, the issue of whether or not the U.S. Supreme Court could hear William Marbury 's suit against Secretary of State, James Madison, was questioned. The Constitution defines the U.S. Supreme Court jurisdiction:</p>
<p>In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls,



Bibliography: </p> <p>1) Bonsigmore, J. (2006). Before the Law; An Introduction to the Legal Process. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.</p> <p>2) Carp, R. (2004). Judicial Process in America, 6th Ed. Washington, D.C. Congressional Quarterly Press.</p> <p>3) Roskin, M. (2003). Political Science; An Introduction, 8th Ed. New Jersey. Prentice Hall.</p> <p>4) Find Law. (2006). The Establishment of Judicial Review. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/article03/13.html#t577</p></body></html>

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Marbury Vs. Madison case is important because it was the first United States Supreme Court case to apply the judicial review principle. This case was between a man named William Marbury and James Madison, when James Madison refused to deliver Marbury's commission, Marbury made a petition, which would bring forth delivery of the commissions. Marbury’s petition was denied and proven not…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Carp, Robert A., Ronald Stidham, and Kenneth L. Manning. "chapter 6." Judicial process in America. 8th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2011. 125. Print.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many jurisdictions the judicial branch has the power to change laws through the process of judicial review. The term “judiciary is also used to refer collectively to the personnel, such as judges, magistrates and other adjudicators, who form the core of a judiciary (sometimes referred to as a “bench”), as well as the staffs who keep the system running smoothly. In 1803, Marbury vs Madison case reviewed in the Supreme Court confirmed the legal principle of judicial review demonstrating the ability of the Supreme Court to limit Congressional power by declaring legislation unconstitutional in the new nation.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marbury v. Madison

    • 1386 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In a the year of 1803 a watershed case, Marbury v. Madison, John Marshal Chief Justice's opinion founded the Supreme Court's power to declare acts of United States Congress, and by significance acts of the president, unconstitutional if they surpassed the authorities allowed by the Establishment or Constitution. But most significant thing was that the Court became the judge of the Constitution, the final authority on what the document meant. Intrinsically, the Supreme Court became as a matter of fact also as in theory an equal partner in authorities, and it has acted that role always later on (Erskine P.88-109).…

    • 1386 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. Marbury v. Madison: In this 1803 case, Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional because Congress had overstepped its bounds in granting the Supreme Court the power to issue a writ of mandamus (an ultimatum from the court) to any officer of the United States. This ruling established the principle of judicial review. Marbury's pay was cut.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The system of checks and balances is an important part of the United States Constitution. The three branches of the government representing the separation of powers – executive, legislative, and judicial – each hold specific responsibilities. Checks and balances is a method set in place so that no branch of the government can become to powerful by allowing each branch to limit the powers of the others. This is accomplished by each branch checking the powers of the other branches to ensure the balance between all three. “The rationale of the separation of powers is often elided with the rationale of checks and balances and with the rationale of the dispersal of power generally in a constitutional system” (Waldron).…

    • 799 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law studies

    • 314 Words
    • 1 Page

    The original intend to having three branches is to be able balance them out but I think that the judicial branch has been claiming more power. Courts making decisions that overturn laws that have been signed into law even when there is no Constitutional basis for such an action.…

    • 314 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nfib vs. Sebelius

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. Madison, he says, “if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the constitution; or conformably to the constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty” (317). Judicial review for Marshall was to balance the powers of the branches of government and to establish…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary foundations for the power which it exercises over the American judicial system is the basics of judicial review. This power consists of the ability of the Supreme Court to decide upon “review” that a piece of some form of Government action is not permitted under the Constitution and can be deemed “unconstitutional”. The Supreme Court established this idea early in its existence and was empowered as a vital institution in the American Government primarily by exercising it. Judicial review is controversial because an unelected group is charged with interpreting the Constitution and the validity of laws affecting the population. Judicial review should be void of all political favoring, however, the power granted to a body that is not accountable to the public can be seen as an imbalance in the checks and balances intended by the three branch system of democracy in the United States.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    3-Schubert, F. A. (2012). Introduction to law and the legal system. Mason, Ohio: Cengage Learning.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I gather from our readings and videos that the United States Judicial Branch certainly is the most power branch of government. I believe this has been the case since Marbury vs. Madison in 1803 exercising the basis of judicial review under Article III of the Constitution. Judicial review is where the court has the ability to examine and decided if a statue, treaty or administrative regulation contradicts or violates the previsions of an existing law, State Constitution, or United States Constitution. In my opinion the Judicial Branch has gotten a little too big for their britches in recent years. They basically have the final say on what is constitutional and what is not regardless of the situation. The Judicial Branch has the authority to override any of the other branches of government.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Branch

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United States Government is broken down into three branches. Legislative, Executive, and Judicial. Think about it! The Legislative branch is grouped into Congress, The Senate, and The House of Representatives, this branch is responsible for writing laws. The Executive Branch contains the President of the United States, the Secretary of State, and the Attorney General. This branch is responsible for making the laws official. Also the Judicial Branch is the United States Supreme Court. This branch is in charge of addressing whether or whether not laws are constitutional, and whether or whether not they are permitted under constitution. In 1787, the United States Constitution was written to establish a set of principle rules on how they believed…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial review is unlike almost every other aspect of the American legal and legislative processes. It’s different for several reasons, but it is most unique in the sense that it was put into practice before it was put in to the books as law. It was instituted by Chief Justice John Marshall in 1803’s landmark case Marbury v. Madison. Judicial review has been around for over 200 years, and it still draws as much criticism today as it did the day it was instituted.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Supreme Court’s power of judicial review should not be strictly limited by a constitutional amendment because the simple fact what if you do a judgment that they are not in the right of? If the judge is proved wrong then it will be appealed. For an example we the people shouldn’t be judged because what if one commits the same crime and does it intentionally such as killing someone and then someone does it to protect them and their family from harm if someone broke into their home and was coming at them and the only thing was to kill them to keep from getting their children or self harmed.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A Dictionary of Law. Sixth edition. Edited by Elizabeth A. Martin, Jonathan Law. OxfordUniversityPress, 2006. – p. 154.…

    • 8111 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays