Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Judicial Department

Powerful Essays
1656 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Judicial Department
ARTICLE VIII
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Section 1. The judicial power shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such lower courts as may be established by law.
Judicial power includes the duty of the courts of justice to settle actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable, and to determine whether or not there has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of any branch or instrumentality of the Government.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to define, prescribe, and apportion the jurisdiction of the various courts but may not deprive the Supreme Court of its jurisdiction over cases enumerated in Section 5 hereof.
No law shall be passed reorganizing the Judiciary when it undermines the security of tenure of its Members.
Section 3. The Judiciary shall enjoy fiscal autonomy. Appropriations for the Judiciary may not be reduced by the legislature below the amount appropriated for the previous year and, after approval, shall be automatically and regularly released.
Section 4. 1. The Supreme Court shall be composed of a Chief Justice and fourteen Associate Justices. It may sit en banc or in its discretion, in division of three, five, or seven Members. Any vacancy shall be filled within ninety days from the occurrence thereof. 2. All cases involving the constitutionality of a treaty, international or executive agreement, or law, which shall be heard by the Supreme Court en banc, and all other cases which under the Rules of Court are required to be heard en banc, including those involving the constitutionality, application, or operation of presidential decrees, proclamations, orders, instructions, ordinances, and other regulations, shall be decided with the concurrence of a majority of the Members who actually took part in the deliberations on the issues in the case and voted thereon. 3. Cases or matters heard by a division shall be decided or resolved with the concurrence of a majority of the Members who actually took part in the deliberations on the issues in the case and voted thereon, and in no case without the concurrence of at least three of such Members. When the required number is not obtained, the case shall be decided en banc: Provided, that no doctrine or principle of law laid down by the court in a decision rendered en banc or in division may be modified or reversed except by the court sitting en banc.
Section 5. The Supreme Court shall have the following powers: 1. Exercise original jurisdiction over cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and over petitions for certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, quo warranto, and habeas corpus. 2. Review, revise, reverse, modify, or affirm on appeal or certiorari, as the law or the Rules of Court may provide, final judgments and orders of lower courts in: a. All cases in which the constitutionality or validity of any treaty, international or executive agreement, law, presidential decree, proclamation, order, instruction, ordinance, or regulation is in question. b. All cases involving the legality of any tax, impost, assessment, or toll, or any penalty imposed in relation thereto. c. All cases in which the jurisdiction of any lower court is in issue. d. All criminal cases in which the penalty imposed is reclusion perpetua or higher. e. All cases in which only an error or question of law is involved. 3. Assign temporarily judges of lower courts to other stations as public interest may require. Such temporary assignment shall not exceed six months without the consent of the judge concerned. 4. Order a change of venue or place of trial to avoid a miscarriage of justice. 5. Promulgate rules concerning the protection and enforcement of constitutional rights, pleading, practice, and procedure in all courts, the admission to the practice of law, the integrated bar, and legal assistance to the under-privileged. Such rules shall provide a simplified and inexpensive procedure for the speedy disposition of cases, shall be uniform for all courts of the same grade, and shall not diminish, increase, or modify substantive rights. Rules of procedure of special courts and quasi-judicial bodies shall remain effective unless disapproved by the Supreme Court. 6. Appoint all officials and employees of the Judiciary in accordance with the Civil Service Law.
Section 6. The Supreme Court shall have administrative supervision over all courts and the personnel thereof.
Section 7. 1. No person shall be appointed Member of the Supreme Court or any lower collegiate court unless he is a natural-born citizen of the Philippines. A Member of the Supreme Court must be at least forty years of age, and must have been for fifteen years or more, a judge of a lower court or engaged in the practice of law in the Philippines. 2. The Congress shall prescribe the qualifications of judges of lower courts, but no person may be appointed judge thereof unless he is a citizen of the Philippines and a member of the Philippine Bar. 3. A Member of the Judiciary must be a person of proven competence, integrity, probity, and independence.
Section 8. 1. A Judicial and Bar Council is hereby created under the supervision of the Supreme Court composed of the Chief Justice as ex officio Chairman, the Secretary of Justice, and a representative of the Congress as ex officio Members, a representative of the Integrated Bar, a professor of law, a retired Member of the Supreme Court, and a representative of the private sector. 2. The regular members of the Council shall be appointed by the President for a term of four years with the consent of the Commission on Appointments. Of the Members first appointed, the representative of the Integrated Bar shall serve for four years, the professor of law for three years, the retired Justice for two years, and the representative of the private sector for one year. 3. The Clerk of the Supreme Court shall be the Secretary ex officio of the Council and shall keep a record of its proceedings. 4. The regular Members of the Council shall receive such emoluments as may be determined by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court shall provide in its annual budget the appropriations for the Council. 5. The Council shall have the principal function of recommending appointees to the judiciary. It may exercise such other functions and duties as the Supreme Court may assign to it.
Section 9. The Members of the Supreme Court and judges of lower courts shall be appointed by the President from a list of at least three nominees preferred by the Judicial and Bar Council for every vacancy. Such appointments need no confirmation.
For the lower courts, the President shall issued the appointment within ninety days from the submission of the list.
Section 10. The salary of the Chief Justice and of the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court, and of judges of lower courts shall be fixed by law. During the continuance in office, their salary shall not be decreased.
Section 11. The Members of the Supreme Court and judges of the lower court shall hold office during good behavior until they reach the age of seventy years or become incapacitated to discharge the duties of their office. The Supreme Court en banc shall have the power to discipline judges of lower courts, or order their dismissal by a vote of majority of the Members who actually took part in the deliberations on the issues in the case and voted in thereon.
Section 12. The Members of the Supreme Court and of other courts established by law shall not be designated to any agency performing quasi-judicial or administrative function.
Section 13. The conclusions of the Supreme Court in any case submitted to it for the decision en banc or in division shall be reached in consultation before the case the case assigned to a Member for the writing of the opinion of the Court. A certification to this effect signed by the Chief Justice shall be issued and a copy thereof attached to the record of the case and served upon the parties. Any Member who took no part, or dissented, or abstained from a decision or resolution must state the reason therefor. The same requirements shall be observed by all lower collegiate court.
Section 14. No decision shall be rendered by any court without expressing therein clearly and distinctly the facts and the law on which it is based.
No petition for review or motion for reconsideration of a decision of the court shall be refused due course or denied without stating the legal basis therefor.
Section 15. 1. All cases or matters filed after the effectivity of this Constitution must be decided or resolved within twenty-four months from date of submission for the Supreme Court, and, unless reduced by the Supreme Court, twelve months for all lower collegiate courts, and three months for all other lower courts. 2. A case or matter shall be deemed submitted for decision or resolution upon the filing of the last pleading, brief, or memorandum required by the Rules of Court or by the court itself. 3. Upon the expiration of the corresponding period, a certification to this effect signed by the Chief Justice or the presiding judge shall forthwith be issued and a copy thereof attached to the record of the case or matter, and served upon the parties. The certification shall state why a decision or resolution has not been rendered or issued within said period. 4. Despite the expiration of the applicable mandatory period, the court, without prejudice to such responsibility as may have been incurred in consequence thereof, shall decide or resolve the case or matter submitted thereto for determination, without further delay.
Section 16. The Supreme Court shall, within thirty days from the opening of each regular session of the Congress, submit to the President and the Congress an annual report on the operations and activities of the Judiciary.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Edmund Randolph Pres. met with these men regularly for advice on major policies Creating Court System only court mentioned in the constitution was supreme court Judiciary act of 1789- one chief justice and 5 associate judges could make decisions on constitutionality 13 district courts and three…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy/201 Quiz

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    | | |(6). |If a case may be brought in either federal court or in state court, jurisdiction is said to be:…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court through Chief Justice Marshall has shown that the constitution is more superior than the federal law. No place in the constitution affirms the words Justice Marshall proclaimed. In making his judgment, Marshall stated that “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” There is no mention of such words in the Constitution, but it has come to the attention of the courts that whenever there is a conflict of law, the constitution is always supreme (Murphy,…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Article III of the United States Constitution consists of three sections. In section one, the federal courts are created, which is one Supreme Court. This court is comprised of nine justices, one being the Chief Justice. These judges hold their position for life or until they are impeached by Congress. Section one also states that Congress is given the power to create and remove lower courts. The end of Section one declares that the pay of a judge cannot be lowered while appointed, but it can be raised. Section two goes on to explain the powers of the Supreme Court and what power is placed where. It also tells which cases the federal courts are allowed to rule on. Some federal cases can be heard first by the Supreme Court, but almost all cases start in federal district courts. Most importantly, Section two gives the right to be tried by a jury unless the defendant does not want one. Treason is the focus of Section Three. It is the only crime specifically defined in the Constitution. A person is guilty of treason if he or she “levied War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort”. To be convicted of treason, two witnesses of the same act testify or confession of treason is made. The last part of Section Three gives Congress the power…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Article III, Section 2, paragraph one says that the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction only in cases affecting ambassadors, public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall party. However, in all other…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Content Guide

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    US Government – Regular and Honors Chapter 18 – The Judicial System (17 Points Total) Chapter 18, Section 1 (6 Points) For the following chart, fill in the appropriate information |Term |Define | | |Cases can be heard only in the federal courts. | |Exclusive Jurisdiction | | | |Share the power to hear a federal court or a state court. | |Concurrent Jurisdiction | | | |The person who file the suit | |Plaintiff | | | |The person whom the complaint is against | |Defendant | | | |A court in which a case is first heard | |Original Jurisdiction | | | |A court that hears a case on appeal form a lower court | |Appellate Jurisdiction | | Chapter 18, Section 3 (6 Points)…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs. Madision

    • 549 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Judicial Branch consists of the Supreme Court and the judges, and the Supreme Court interprets the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court deals with cases involving the Constitution , the federal laws, treaties and disputes between the states. It does the job its set up to do and the job only, on what powers are allowed by the Constitution. The Constitution is very clear about the position of the Supreme Court as stated in Article III. “The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in One Supreme Court and in such inferior courts that the congress may from time to time ordain and establish.: “The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under the Constitution, the laws of the United States and Treaties.”…

    • 549 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. What are the seven articles of the U. S Constitution and the purpose of each; -Article 1. Legislative Department All legislative Powers herein shall be vested (persons and groups that own and control) in a; Congress and House of Representatives. Establishes; Elections and meetings Legislative proceedings Rights of members Bills and resolutions Powers of Congress (both houses) Powers denied to Congress Powers denied to the States -Article 2.…

    • 4490 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs Madison Essay

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marbury v. Madison was the landmark case that laid the foundation for judicial review in the United States. Article III of the Constitution, in granting power to the judiciary, extended judicial power to various types of cases but made no comment as to whether a legislative or executive action could be struck down. Chief Justice Marshall, relying on reasoning and the Constitution, read the power of judicial review over acts of the government into constitutional law, thus setting the precedent for future cases. He said, “a law repugnant to the constitution is void and that when a law is in opposition to the constitution, the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply. It is the Supreme Court’s duty to say what the law is and thus has the power of judicial review over federal legislation/acts.”…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Judicial Act of 1789 gave Congress the act of granting the Supreme Court the right to issue writs of mandamus. Article III of the Constitution grants the Supreme Court the authority to review acts of Congress to validate whether they are unconstitutional or not and therefore void. Article III of the Constitution also states "the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be a party. In all other cases, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction." The Supreme Court held that they had the authority to review acts of Congress and determine whether or not they were constitutional and void those that were not, but that Congress did not have the right to expand the scope of the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction beyond what was specified in the Constitution. The Supreme Court also held that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional and therefore void.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the U.S. Supreme Court, in its discretion, decides to take a case, it is said that the Court has:…

    • 610 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United State Supreme Court was established through by the Constitution in Articles III of 1787 and gave it authority to hear certain appeals brought from the lower courts and the state courts. If necessary, the United State also has the…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    indicates if if the four justice believe that case she be heard then, a writ of certiorari would be…

    • 661 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Ethics Compiled Reports

    • 44073 Words
    • 177 Pages

    5. Promulgate rules concerning the protection and enforcement of constitutional rights, pleading, practice, and procedure in all courts, the admission to the practice of law, the integrated bar, and legal assistance to the under-privileged. Such rules shall provide a simplified and inexpensive procedure for the speedy disposition of cases, shall be uniform for all courts of the same grade, and shall not diminish, increase, or modify substantive rights. Rules of procedure of special courts and quasi-judicial bodies shall remain effective unless disapproved by the Supreme Court.”…

    • 44073 Words
    • 177 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legislature and Judiciary

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There has been a game of tug of war between the legislature and judiciary from the early days of implementation of the constitution . The problem started when the judicial interpretation of property clause was considered as ambiguous by legislature and led to the amendment of the constitution .The tension between the legislature and judiciary has been discussed in paper on the basis of 3 points :1.’ the judicial approach to legislation particularly in the public welfare field’ ,2.’ the legislative reaction to judicial interpretations of the Constitution’ 3., the judicial attitude towards legislative privilege.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays