Preview

Judges Trial And Non Trial Responsibilities Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
302 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Judges Trial And Non Trial Responsibilities Essay
Judges have both trial and non-trial responsibilities. There non-trial duties include determining probable cause, signing warrants, informing suspects of their rights, setting and revoking bail, arraigning defendants, and accepting guilty pleas (Bohm & Haley, 2012). Much of a Judges workday is spent in their offices (chambers). Judges negotiate procedures with prosecutors and defense attorneys. Judges must ensure that both suspect and defendants are treated fairly (Bohm & Haley, 2012). A Judge’s trial duties include managing their own behavior; ensuring juries have a fair chance to reach a verdict based on the evidence presented, and providing clear jury instruction on precedent and relevant laws. Judges must interpret precedence and apply them to the case being heard (Bohm & Haley, 2012). A judge may have additional duties in jurisdictions without professional court administrators. Judges in these jurisdictions may have responsibilities that include supervising building maintenance, budgeting, labor relations, and managing their own courtrooms and staff (Bohm & Haley, 2012). Judges have a great deal more responsibilities than just sitting behind the courtroom bench. …show more content…
The branches are the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. The court system is a part of the judicial branch. The legislative branch has responsibility to initiate and pass laws. The executive branch enforces the law. The judicial branch interprets the law. An article in the University of Queensland Law Journal talks about the responsibilities of Judges. The article states that one of the most important duties of a Judge is to fairly and impartially interpret laws (Callinan & Stoker,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The role of the courts: Courts have certain jurisdiction over certain areas of the law. There are several levels of court in NSW which are set out in hierarchical order. The NSW Courts are as…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As for the Judges they decide if there is enough probable evidence to proceed with the case. Finally, the defense attorneys make arguments that certain evidence and certain individuals should be kept out of the criminal trial. I personally believe that the Judge has the most important role during Pre-Trail hearing because they have the final say on what can and will happen…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    prosecutor, a state's attorney general, and as a judge on state trial and appellate courts…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The role of the court is to determine whether or not a crime has been committed and impose a sentence where appropriate. In the first instance the alleged offender will appear in the magistrates court where it will be decided whether or not to grant bail or remand in custody…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Checkpoint #6 Cjs/200

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First I will start off with the one who has all the authority, the judge. The judge is the one who makes all the rules. Next is the prosecuting attorney. The prosecuting attorney may also be known as the district attorney, state’s attorney, county attorney, commonwealth attorney or solicitor. The prosecuting attorneys duty is to conduct criminal proceedings on the behalf of the state or the people against those accused. The three main roles of the prosecutor are investigating crimes, to decide whether or not to instigate legal proceedings and to appear in court. All of the duties of a prosecutor may become too much for one person to handle so they supervise a staff of assistant district attorneys who do most of the work in the courtroom. The prosecuting attorney determines which cases to pursue by the amount of evidence that they gather. If the attorney cannot find enough evidence to get a conviction then they may make the decision to drop the case. Next is the defense attorney. The defense attorney is the one who represents the one being accused of a crime. Public defenders also represents those accused of crimes, however they are state employed lawyers.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CJUS 330

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Judges: in state courts they are elected by the voters. Federal judges are nominated by the president. Judges are the ultimate authority figures in the courthouse. Only they can set bail, instruct jurors, and impose sentences.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law M1

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are two types of judges, superior judges and inferior judges in the UK. The superior judges are entitled to work in the higher courts such as, the court of Appeal, and the House of Lords. Whereas, inferior judges work in the lower courts in the hierarchy such as crown courts and supreme courts. Superior judges are called district judges and inferior judges are called circuit judges. District judges are full-time judges who deal with the majority of cases in the county courts. These judges are appointed by the queen and mainly deal with claims and other matters within the court. However, Circuit judges are appointed to one of seven regions of England and Wales, and sit in the crown and county courts within their particular region. The difference between both judges is that, superior judges are more experienced as compared to the inferior judges, they have a minimum experience of 20 years but inferior judge has less experience so therefore, they have to do some training. Superior judges wear long wigs and extravagant gowns; however, inferior judges also wear the same but a bit shorter. For superior judges their salaries are a lot higher compared to inferior judges.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    County Courts Case Study

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the textbook, there is a hierarchy of courts in the judiciary system. All the courts share certain functions, however they also vary in their responsibilities.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs. Madision

    • 549 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Judicial Branch consists of the Supreme Court and the judges, and the Supreme Court interprets the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court deals with cases involving the Constitution , the federal laws, treaties and disputes between the states. It does the job its set up to do and the job only, on what powers are allowed by the Constitution. The Constitution is very clear about the position of the Supreme Court as stated in Article III. “The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in One Supreme Court and in such inferior courts that the congress may from time to time ordain and establish.: “The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under the Constitution, the laws of the United States and Treaties.”…

    • 549 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Judicial Branch is headed by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court interprets the Constitution, reviews law and decides on cases involving states’ rights.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The deal with the judge in the same manner as the rest of the people involved in the court room by showing the upmost respect and following the rules that are enforced by the judge. The interaction with the prosecution can at times be a bumpy ride due to the fact the prosecution will do what is necessary and at times can slip away from playing by the rules. The defense will find holes in the prosecution and provide the information to their client. At times some of the actions can lead to a person who may be proven guilty the chance to walk due to the fact of the rights being broken. The defense does what is best for the client with the information provided and the ability to enforce that their client is being treated to a fair trial.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Executive branch is composed of the President, the Vice President, and the departments, which is responsible for making sure that the laws set in place are properly carried out. The Judicial branch, which is accountable for establishing justice and comprehending the law, contains the Supreme Court and the federal courts. The final branch is the Legislative branch, which includes the House and the Senate, has the ability to approve, create, or veto laws. Each branch holds certain rights over the other in order to keep it in check and not allow one division to be superior over the other, so when it comes to the judicial branch, the legislative and executive branch hold some authority over the judicial. There is no complete control given to any branch. For example, the legislative branch (the senate), and the executive branch (the president), appoint and suggest those who may be a part of the judicial branch (the Supreme Court justices), but the judicial branch is also given the power to judge the actions of the president and the…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    judge. As said in the dissent of Justice Fraser, “a trial judge is required to do what he or she can…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (National Institute of Justice, 2008). The court reporter is tasked with recording all elements of the trial in short hand, including instructions to the court, testimony, and rulings. The courtroom clerk “is an officer of the court and documents what happens in a case, orders made by the court during the trial, and the verdict at the end of the trial” (Arizona Judicial Branch, 2013, para. 2). The clerk is also responsible for admitting exhibits and evidence throughout the trial. While the judge, bailiff, court reporter, and courtroom clerk ensure proper procedure through the trial, the prosecutor, defense counsel, defendant, and witnesses present the case for a verdict to be decided.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Courtroom Workgroup

    • 1217 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A judge is the ultimate authority in the courtroom, and satisfies both the rights of the accused and public interests in justice administration. Judges on the Federal level are nominated by the President and those nominations are confirmed by the Senate. Judges on the state level are put in power by election or appointment by the Governor. Judges must weigh objections, decide on the admissibility of evidence presented, maintain order, and discipline on anyone who interferes with the operation of the court. In trials with no jury, or a bench trial, the judge will determine guilt or innocence.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays