Preview

Judge Hubert Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1840 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Judge Hubert Case Study
I sat in on Judge Hubert’s court. Judge Paul Hubert is the presiding judge for Catch Court in Franklin County. Catch Court is located in Columbus, Ohio at 375 South High Street. What is does ‘Catch’ stand for in Catch Court? “Catch stands for Changing Actions to Change Habits” (Hubert, 2017). Why did you start Catch Court? Judge Hubert saw a need for women who were coming through his court. These women for victims of human trafficking not prostitutes. These women were victims and needed help. “One day I saw a woman come in with bruises and thought it was a domestic violence victim. I looked down at the file and saw she was a defendant — "prostitution," said the charge. It then hit me that these women had the same bruises, broken bones, …show more content…
Judge Hubert shows so much mercy and grace in his courtroom. The justice that Judge Hubert uses shows his heart for the justice Jesus asks of us. Once a week Judge opens his court room to have all the women in Catch Court for a meal. “When you give a luncheon or dinner, do not invite your friends, your brothers or sisters, your relatives, or your rich neighbors; if you do, they may invite you back and so you will be repaid. But when you give a banquet, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind” (Luke 14:12-13, NIV). Timothy Keller explains mishpat, mishpat is- "giving people their rights" (Keller, 2012, p.3). Judge Hubert gives rights to the women he sees and also stands up for those rights. “The Lord gives freedom to the prisoners” (Psalms 146:7, NKJV). There is a need for justice for those that are neglected, “any neglect shown to the needs of the members of this quarter is not called merely a lack of mercy or charity, but a violation of justice” (Keller, 2012, p.5). God tells us, in Proverbs 31:8, to “speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy” (NIV). Some of the women were talking about how they look at court as a place of support. When they are in need of help, the women come to the court. One women said that she finds strength in …show more content…
It says in Romans 3:22-24, “This righteousness is given through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference between Jew and Gentile, for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and all are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus” (NIV). We are not perfect and have and will all sin. We can’t stop all crime and sin from happening. We have to remember the promises that God has told us. This is not the end. Heaven is our home and there is no crime in Heaven. “I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world” (John 16:33, NIV). “To explain and understand crime, criminologists have developed many theories” (Schmalleger, 2015, p.13). Judge Hubert’s theory regarding the cause of crime is Social Problem Perspective. “Social Problem Perspective holds that crime is a manifestation of underlying social problems such as poverty, discrimination, inequality of opportunity, breakdown of traditional social institutions, low level of formal education among some disadvantaged groups, ….and so on” (Schmalleger, 2015, p.15). There are problems in society. People are not recognizing that prostitution is not a choice. There is always a reason why people are the way they are, it doesn’t just happen. People’s lives, circumstances and situations shape them as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ms. Greear stated that Mr. Daubert had kissed one of the female players named Kendra Wallin. He had kissed her once on the forehead and once on the cheek. In addition, Ms. Greear stated that Mr. Daubert had put his hands on Ms. Wallin’s waist. It was not clear from Ms. Greear’s statements if she witnessed the kisses by Mr. Daubert or if she was told that it took place by Ms. Wallin.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FACTS OF THE CASE: The Appellant, Director of Finance at Toyota Marin Lou Suriyan Sisuphan, took almost $30,000 in order to persuade the termination of Sisuphan’s coworker Ian McClelland by suggesting that McClelland should be held responsible for the lost money. The Appellant did not have the intention to take this money permanently, and returned the money before any charges were filed, but not within the 24 hour amnesty period that the dealership offered. The dealership terminated Sisphan’s employment, and charged Sisuphan with a “felony offense of embezzlement by an employee of property valued in excess of $400 (§§ 487, subd. (a), 508, & 514) and alleging a prior assault conviction (§ 245, subd. (a)(2)) as a sentence enhancement.”JUDICIAL HISTORY: The trial court found Sisuphan…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jenelle Evans' ex-husband, Courtland Rogers, was arrested and jailed again on Friday, November 20 in Burnswick County, North Carolina.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jones V. Tsige Case Study

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort system provides compensation to individuals who have been wronged or injured by the activity of another individual. Until the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Jones v. Tsige in 2012, resulting in the creation of the tort of intrusion upon seclusion, the common law did not include torts that did not entail a personal or financial injury. It is essential the common law includes torts that do not entail actual injury to provide individuals the means of seeking remedies when they are wronged from the wrongdoer responsible for the action.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    McWilliams V Dunn Supreme Court of the United States Introduction The Dunn v. McWilliams case is a famous court case that was heard before the supreme court of United States in April 24, 2017. The case involved James McWilliams as the petitioner against Jefferson Dunn was the commissioner and was representing the Alabama department of corrections. The focus of the case was the sixth amendment of the US constitution was useful in providing for the right to the assistance of an attorney to represent them in defense. However the oral arguments in the case pointed out that it was unclear on whether the defendant’s right to an attorney allows for him to an independent expert who would be devoted in advocating specifically for the defense’s case.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    On 12/03/2015 at 1035 hours, Detective John Reynolds with the Great Bend Police Department and myself had Kerry J. Partridge brought over from the Barton County Jail, for an interview. Partridge was taken into the interview room in the Detectives Office, in reference to cases that the Great Bend Police Department and the Barton County Sheriff Office was working. At 1045 hours Detective Reynolds read Partridge his Miranda Warning , and had Partridge sign his initial rights form. Partridge said, yes he would talk with us and understood his rights.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court Case Summary

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In December, Republican North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory signed into law a bill that limits Gov. –elect Roy Cooper’s power in making appointments by combining the elections board with the State Ethics Commission. The State Ethics Commission oversees ethics laws governing lobbyists, elected officials, and government employees. Under this law, governor successors are only able to appoint 50% of the new board’s members under the requirement that two must be Republicans. Legislative leaders would appoint the other 50% of the new board. Previously, the Governor appointed 60% of the Board of Elections members.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the years leading up to the Civil War, the constitution did not provide a clear answer for deciding whether or not a slave had the same rights as a person. The federal government faced a divided country, and passed laws enforcing the return of slaves to their owner’s states, such as the Fugitive Slave Act. Contradicting this were “personal liberty laws,” which allowed states to decide who would be considered a person in their territory. However, both the Fugitive Slave Act and “personal liberty laws” were challenged in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case. The ambiguity of the constitution would lead to a four-year-long war between the Northern and Southern states.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    USpreme Court Case Study

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    United States Supreme Court cases are argued and decided on Constitutional grounds. All arguments and decisions are based on interpretations of the original Constitution and, more often, on Constitutional amendments.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this weeks issue of The Maycomb weekly, our main story is of Tom Robinson's trial case. the main story Many people gathered in the courtroom in a hot Macomb county courtroom to watch Atticus finch defend a black man, “Tom Robinson” in a white versus black rape case. The attendees of the case included many black and white men from around Macomb County, and surprisingly even some children attended the rape case.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee and the book Mississippi Trial, 1955 by Chris Crowe are two different books surround by the same ideas. To Kill a Mockingbird was a book about a girl named Scout, whose dad, Atticus, is a lawyer, who tried to win a case defending an innocent black man. Atticus did not win the case and Scout started to learn about injustice and what went on at that time in the South. Mississippi Trial, 1955 was about a boy named Hiram, who lived in the South with his grandpa because his parents were too busy working. His grandpa represented the South in the book and Hiram’s dad represented the North, and Hiram had a stronger relationship with his grandpa and did not really like his dad at the time. After a trial involving…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anne Hutchinson's Trial

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout history we as historians can see that in the past civilizations religion was taken to an extreme in crimes, trials and other subjects. In the 1600s religion was what the country was believed to be founded on, the “holy” land, “God built this land for us!” This also transferred into the courtroom; people who could’ve been suspected to do committing a crime, who really didn’t, but are found guilty because it goes against the beliefs of the higher court. Ann Hutchinson’s trial is a great example of being treated unfairly in a courtroom and also an example of how the court was used during trials. Anne Hutchinson’s trial was an example of how woman should not go above and beyond of a man or church in society, the reason being is because…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justices of the United States Supreme Court are strategic actors who strive to secure policy outcomes as close to their preferred outcome as possible. Accomplishing this sometimes requires justices to not always pursue their true policy preferences and sometimes it requires justices to ignore legal and policy questions. In this essay, I will analyze how justices were strategic in a few landmark supreme court cases.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    That the Supreme Court exercises a policy making role has been an established fact ever since Maybury vs. Madison defined the Court’s role in judicial review of existing law. By choosing which cases to review and by establishing precedents by way interpretation of a law’s meaning and applicability the Court influences the course of action adopted not only by government but by individuals and businesses who consider the implications of the Court’s actions. In adjudicating disagreements of alternative interpretations of a law the Supreme Court establishes policies which have implications extending beyond the specific case in question and into social policy at large. In choosing which cases to review the Court calls attention to certain issues…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Supreme Court has made decisions that have been important in shaping the interpretation of the Constitution. “The Framers of the Constitution intended for the Supreme Court to stand between the two branches of the national government and the people, to prevent abuses of power and improper interpretations of the Constitution (Mott, 2008). The case of Brown vs. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), is an example of when and amendment to the Constitution needed to be interpreted. The Supreme Court made a very important decision in interpret ting the Constitution, in the case of Brown vs. the Board of Education.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays