Journals
LINDA OYEWOPO JOURNAL 27
(1) The list of ten probing questions I could that I could ask my friends to help me find the “truth” and make a wise choice about whether or not to take Dr. Skinner’s class are as follows
(1)Does Doctor Skinner allow time for questions?
(2) Is the lecturer approachable? Can the lecturer be approached if I need help?
(3) Is the class lecture based?
(4) His he prejudiced?
(5) What sort of assignment would I have?
(6) Is he flexible about tardiness and late submissions of assignment?
(7) Is it easy to fall behind in his class?
(8)How closely does he follow the syllabus?
(9) If you miss a test, does he allow the student to have make up test?
(10) What sort of lecture style does he have?
What I think was responsible for the group’s grade of “D” in the case study are quite many. In the first instance, the team did not work together. The team work was nil. I will start with Anthony. Anthony made himself the leader of the group without any body appointing him. He assumed the leadership on his own He was boss, garrulous, and he felt he knew more than any of the other team members. He barks out orders and this irked the rest of the group. On the day of the presentation, instead of the three having the exact topic they would defend, Anthony wanted to defend the whole theory, and even went over Sylvia’s topic. He is not a good leader, because a good leader would at least involve every other members of the group, and he would guide his team in the right direction. On the contrary, he misguided the team. However, Donald is one of those group members that no one would like to have as a member in a group project. He has a non-challant attitude about the project, and he neglected his own duty, and did not participate in group meetings. He left the whole project to just Anthony and Sylvia. However about Sylvia. Sylvia should have been more assertive. She played the role of an underdog, and this really affected
(1) The list of ten probing questions I could that I could ask my friends to help me find the “truth” and make a wise choice about whether or not to take Dr. Skinner’s class are as follows
(1)Does Doctor Skinner allow time for questions?
(2) Is the lecturer approachable? Can the lecturer be approached if I need help?
(3) Is the class lecture based?
(4) His he prejudiced?
(5) What sort of assignment would I have?
(6) Is he flexible about tardiness and late submissions of assignment?
(7) Is it easy to fall behind in his class?
(8)How closely does he follow the syllabus?
(9) If you miss a test, does he allow the student to have make up test?
(10) What sort of lecture style does he have?
What I think was responsible for the group’s grade of “D” in the case study are quite many. In the first instance, the team did not work together. The team work was nil. I will start with Anthony. Anthony made himself the leader of the group without any body appointing him. He assumed the leadership on his own He was boss, garrulous, and he felt he knew more than any of the other team members. He barks out orders and this irked the rest of the group. On the day of the presentation, instead of the three having the exact topic they would defend, Anthony wanted to defend the whole theory, and even went over Sylvia’s topic. He is not a good leader, because a good leader would at least involve every other members of the group, and he would guide his team in the right direction. On the contrary, he misguided the team. However, Donald is one of those group members that no one would like to have as a member in a group project. He has a non-challant attitude about the project, and he neglected his own duty, and did not participate in group meetings. He left the whole project to just Anthony and Sylvia. However about Sylvia. Sylvia should have been more assertive. She played the role of an underdog, and this really affected