Preview

Jon Lovett The Culture Of Shut Up Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
684 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jon Lovett The Culture Of Shut Up Analysis
In the article “The Culture of Shut Up,” author Jon Lovett ponders the current state of public dialogue in the age of the Internet. Lovett is a Los Angeles based writer and a former speech writer for President Barack Obama (13). The author suggests that the internet, which provides for exceptional access to diverse public speech, will inevitably include speech that is offensive. Lovett’s opinion is that people must resist the urge to punish such speech, if people want to allow a range of voices to be heard and makes his argument majorly effective by using humor and providing popular examples of where people have been told “to shut up”.
The writer opinion is that protecting freedom of speech is now up to people of the Internet age. As institutional gatekeepers lose their power to control information, it becomes easier for self- appointed individual gatekeepers to step in. The common result is barbarous accusations and calls for an apology in response to online content. The authors
…show more content…
The Internet provides a growing platform for inaccurate, untrue and questionable information. On the upside, the miracle of Internet connectivity speeds peoples access to the information, knowledge and insights that contribute to humanities social and intellectual evolution. It also helps sweep aside information gatekeepers in positions of power whose “arrogant . . . unimaginative and shortsighted” approach to information has traditionally promoted their own interests and attitudes toward control (Lovett 16). Lovett states that “the right to free speech begins and ends with the First Amendment, but there is a vast middle where our freedom of speech is protected by our capacity to listen and accept that people disagree” (18). The First Amendment’s protections have always put a great deal of responsibility in the hands of the people and now they have more of that power

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the essay “Let’s Shut Them Down’ by Michael Crowley he argues about web technology and the first amendment begin used wrongly. Crowley used 69-year-old New York citizen John Young as a perfect example using the web in an irresponsible way. Young believed that if people knew the government secrets they would be safer. He would post information on his website of government officials making the information available to anyone to see. As many government official wanted to shut the sites downs, people like Young who ran them were protected because the first amendment giving them the right of freedom of speech, which was clearly taken out of control. Some co-anti websites such as Young were getting out of control such as were government official…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The anticipated audience consists of internet users and the millions of people who visit Wikipedia on a daily basis for fast reference facts. It also includes Wikipedia and members of Congress. USA Today is a very public forum that created a lot of discussion about Seigenthaler’s essay and made the argument more persuasive. It also brought attention to the issues of freedom and accountability on the internet.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Today’s society allows us to speak freely online without censorship, therefore all citizens are able to become publishers. This however had become an issue since we don’t all share the same values. I strongly feel freedom of speech is a privilege given to us and we should be able to exercise our right was ease. The author's main claim is that freedom of speech is safe and secure, people will forever say what is on their mind…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his essay “Opinion Rights,” Jamie Whyte argues that “we are not entitled to our opinions, nor should we be, because such an entitlement is the enemy of intellectual progress” (13). Whyte supports his claim by informing his audience that rights to an opinion entail duties. Whyte states that “the only time people invoke the right to their opinions is when they have suddenly realized they have no grounds upon which they can hold those opinions and thus are left instead with nothing but selfish motives for holding those opinions” (16). Based on Whyte’s claim we should all support our opinions with evidence.…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever read something in a book or an article and found yourself wondering about how much that could affect readers? For some reason, whether due to a personal disagreement with the message, or academic dissatisfaction with content, or something else entirely, you ask yourself ‘How is this allowed to exist, to be circulated and available for our posterity?’ In some form, that sentiment, and the censorship of information which results from it, have both been around for as long as information itself has existed. Whether it be the Church’s rejection of the spread of heresy, or the Third Reich’s manipulation of propaganda, information has always been controlled and taken advantage of. And yet, it may still surprise some to find that information…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the past twenty or so years information has largely been stored in digital form, providing the current generation of digital natives with access to more and more information in recent years. With this new flow of information available to the public has come increased censoring by the government. However, this is not a new issue as some might believe. Since the first primitive government was established information has been shielded and manipulated from the every day citizens of the world by those in power. The cause fought against information censorship enjoys the same past. For as long as information has been censored there have been those who have fought against it (Newth, 2010). This issue has arisen particularly in the United States, as some believe access to any information that exists is a right protected by the Constitution.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are instances when freedom of speech is impaired, even though it is a constitutional right given to all Americans. This fundamental freedom is abridged when someone is bound by ludicrous Non-Disclosure Agreements, or NDA’s, on college campuses by enforcement, and in some forms by social media. According to Joanna Vamvaka, a speech writer, states, “In that sense, fundamental right to free speech serves as limitation to its own limitation” (Vamvaka 1).…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Citizens United Case

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Wu, T. (2010). The Future of Free Speech. Chronicle of Higher Education, 57 (13), B4-B5.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    MacKinnon’s push for the removal of the right to free speech is not only reckless, but extremely dangerous. As an American, MacKinnon fails to recognise that it is a fundamental democratic right recognized in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and that freedom of speech is far too precious a protection to be eliminated. She attempts to justify her arguments by using the example of protecting pornography. This poor argument to such an important right in the US does not represent it in its full scope. The First Amendment ensures that speech ensures that every person has the opportunity to express their views.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, guarantees our freedom of expression, as it is written in the constitution, “The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their statements; and the freedom of the press, one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable.” This clause is the based foundation of the articles: “Hate Speech on the Internet Should Be Regulated” by Ronald Eissens, and “Hate Speech on the Internet Should Not Be Regulated” by Sandy Starr, in which both authors reveled their opinions and standing on this issue by using different styles and presenting their ideas in different ways.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the wake of school shootings, cracking down on potential threats has become priority. Not only are there threats of mass violence, but racist speech and sexist speech, that some would define as fighting words. A question to ask is when does speech become a fighting word. Having to decide what speech is protected by the first amendment, worthwhile, and what speech has no social value and is not protected, worthless, is controversial. Speech that is defined as worthless include: lewd, obscene, profane, libelous, and fighting words. Focusing on fighting words and the ever developing world of technology, we will examine a present-day situation of words that wound and compare them to past cases.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    law assignment USA

    • 1767 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The first amendment protects the freedom of speech. This case of Reno v American Civil Liberties Union represents an interesting debate on protection of freedom of speech versus regulation of material which is regarded indecent. The subject matter in this case was the Communication Decency Act against Internet on the issue of indecency. The case compared Internet with Library, Television and Public Place. However, in comparing with these mediums, Internet appears to be slightly, if not majorly, different. It is because, when compared with the television, the internet user might have to go…

    • 1767 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hate Speech Policy

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This means that hate speech is inevitable. With the proof of the increasing hate speech on the internet and violence, it is prominent that regulations or restrictions must be imposed. When someone is exposed to hateful speech, it can and has provoke hate in that individual, even if the hate stems from little truth. We believe in equality; discriminations can spread like wildfire and it is important to regulate its influence in the…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I suspect that no community will become humane and caring by restricting what its members can say. The worst offenders will simply find other ways to irritate and insult.”…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedom of speech is a precious right that Americans have fought for, treasured, and horribly abused. Enabling a man to speak whatsoever he chooses was a risky and dangerous gamble taken by our founding fathers. Nevertheless, it accomplished great things. It gave the black man a chance to stand proudly with the white man; it gave the woman a chance to step fearlessly into a man’s position. These accomplishments are, indeed, honorable and admirable. Yet the abuses this freedom has suffered have become far too great. In today’s media, serious topics such as politics, religion, and even sexuality have become the focus of public mockery and spite. Television shows such as South Park and Family Guy take serious issues and create invidious parodies that depict what almost everyone is thinking, but barely anyone dares to say. Barely anyone dares to say it because they know that it is offensive and cruel. These pernicious opinions are the epitome of the abuse of freedom of speech. The potential to harm others with strong but misguided opinions through media is unnecessary and carries a strong negative connotation.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays