Preview

John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie's attack on their given titles of "Robber Barons".

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
405 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie's attack on their given titles of "Robber Barons".
Despite the fact that many had viewed John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie as "Tycoons of Industry" or "Robber Barons", these two industrial giants begged to differ. "Robber Baron" was a name given to industrial giants in the late 19th century who were believed to have become wealthy through unethical means, such as questionable stock-market operations. Rockefeller once stated "...and only through such successive steps and by a great aggregation of capital is America today enabled to utilize the bounty which its land pours forth, and to furnish the world with light." He believed it was necessary during the time of the great depression for him to increase his capital. In doing so he consulted with other companies within the business to bring out some order. This was Rockefeller's view of the situation, but many others of his time, or people of the working class did not perceive the situation as he did. They believed Rockefeller and aggregation of capital worked together to cheat them out of their money in a time of crisis.

Another famous industrialist, Andrew Carnegie argued that capitalists are the benefactors of the world. Carnegie believed that the poor should follow such capitalists or men of wealth because it produces the most beneficial results for the community. Carnegie stated, "The man of wealth thus becoming the mere trustee and agent for his poorer brethren, bringing to their service his superior wisdom...doing for them better than they would or could do for themselves..." Once again, a great capitalist such as himself portrayed his position in a positive aspect. Carnegie believed the working class should entrust their money to such capitalists to his belief that the capitalists' wisdom is far greater than that of the working class. Because of such belief, the capitalists would provide a better community for all with their wise judgment.

Andrew Carnegie provided a sense of closure for the American people. This is rather interesting because it

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    John D. Rockefeller has earned a spot in the hall of shame. He became wealthy because of ruthless and dishonorable business tactics which then hurt the nation. Rockefeller became wealthy because, he lowered his prices way down and forced the Pennsylvania Railroad to lower their prices, and he also ran smaller companies out of business and then took them over for his own. After he took over most of the smaller businesses, he raised his own prices back up in order to bring in a bigger profit. Rockefeller’s robber baron side was reflected by this action because, he went behind people’s backs and turned the other way when it came to business partners.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morgan,Rockefeller and Carnegie were robber barons They were considered cruel and ruthless. Carnegie made his employees work long hours and gave them little pay he even tried to stop unions in his company. Employees pointed out that Rockefeller could have paid his workers a fairer wage and settled for being a half billionaire. Morgan criticized for creating monopolies by making it difficult for any business to compete against his.…

    • 70 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Robber Barons was the negative term for the titans of industry or, as Professor Donald Miller calls them, the capitalist conquistadors. These were the guys like Andrew Carnegie, Cornelius Vanderbilt, Gustavus Swift, Philip Armour, John D. Rockefeller and others who rose to the top and ran monopolies or near-monopolies in the Gilded Age (1870s-1900ish). They were seen as bad because they employed ruthless methods to run competion out of the market, but on the other hand, weren't breaking any laws or rules in this laissez faire timeperiod. These guys also gave a lot of money away: Carnegie built tons of libraries, and Carnegie Mellon University got a lot from him,…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    These men were robber barons. They treated their workers very poorly. Rockefeller would make his workers work long desilet hours for very little pay. Carnage made his employees work long hours and little pay. He even tried to stop unios in his company. Carnegie competed fiercely in business and tried to squash organized labor. Rockefeller, and Carnegie were robber barons. It explains how they treated their workers very badly and how little they paid them.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In a sense, Vanderbilt and Rockefeller are captains of the industry but only by using a capitalist approach with intensive labor. Using false hopes for the immigrants that wanted a better life. Feeding them lies and poor wages which explains their robber baron intent. These men upon lucky made their wealth. The fact is that these millionaires trapped people into the notion that American dream to work hard and you too can obtain wealth. Understanding that social Darwinism implements the survival of the fittest in social and political stance is basically a one-way streak. People who have the right upbringings and domination over the lower class. Economic divisions are mostly important to wealth and inherited wealth they don’t want to be in the…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    what is the accurate way to view the capitalist business leaders of the gilded age? they did care much for the people but more for the money they would make off the people. even though these people did not try to make a change the outcomes of their decisions made a difference in our lives today.where the capitalist robber baron or were they captains of industry? The term Robber Baron comes from the idea that the capitalists of the late 19th century were greedy, selfish and power-hungry. This comes from the fact that they ruthlessly grew their economic empires into monopolies that crushed the competition. So capitalist would be considered both Robber Barons and Captains of Industry. Progressivism began as a social movement and grew into a political…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Robber Barons

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A great example of a robber baron would be Andrew Carnegie. The robber baron of the steel industry. He was instrumental in starting the 72 hour work week, paying out less than fair wages and having dangerous working conditions. Andrew Carnegie cornered the market on the steel industry and made the first high rise building. He was the only business in his field, therefore, he could set his prices and up his profits.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I thought that people like Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and J.p Morgan were all robber barons. Because they would employ people and put them in these unsafe, and unsanitary conditions. Also they made education for immigrants coming in difficult because even though they built libraries and hospitals would the immigrants would be illiterate and not be able to pay for hospital bills. Lastly theses men were robber barons because they were using vertical integration and horizontal integration to take over small businesses and to raise prices on railroads.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Carnegie has inspired women and men to use their funds to their communities. Although he advised other wealthy to use their money to benefit the communities and help in the preservation of the political system and America economy. I believe Mr. Carnegie’s argument is persuasive and is still relevant today. The wealthy, as well as small business owners, are the job creators in our society today. Their vision and leadership help to support the lower class in earning a decent living while allowing them to realize their own potential. The lower class today has more opportunities that were not available to them generations ago. While government is there to provide a safety net for those less fortunate, it is the wealthy and job creators that…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John D. Rockefeller created an oil empire, the Standard Oil Company, in this manner. Rockefeller monopolized the oil market through horizontal consolidation, buying out competitors, or driving competitors out of business by initiating rate wars. His cold-hearted mentality was highlighted when he claimed, “Individualism has gone, never to return.” In his testimony to the United States Industrial Commission, Rockefeller boasted about the “power to give the public improved products at less prices and still make a profit for stockholders”, but failed to recognize that consolidation left the poorer class suddenly unemployed. Many magnates also followed Andrew Carnegie’s entrepreneurial tactic of vertical consolidation, in which every stage of manufacturing a product was in the hands of a single corporation. According to James B. Weaver, such schemes allowed trusts to “control the articles which the plain people consume in their daily life.” The American people were forced to cope with the sugar trust, the leather trust, the harvester trust, the tobacco trust, and Rockefeller’s dominant Standard Oil trust. Along with the development of trusts, the invention of machinery allowed rich industrialists to hire less workers for lower wages. By cutting employees and saving money, the corrupt barons were…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    J.P. Morgan was a post-civil war “captain of industry,” separating him from the other “Greats” such as Cornelius Vanderbilt, John D. Rockefeller, and Andrew Carnegie because of his motives and his upbringing. A “robber baron” is most simply defined as an individual who has financial ambitions that cause him to knowingly take advantage of others for his own personal gain. A “captain of industry” seeks solutions to common problems, and though the outcome may prove to be monetarily beneficial, others are not harmed in the process.…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This quote shows the author’s point that Andrew Carnegie was a wise man used his experiences to better benefit his companies.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some adversaries claimed his acts of charity as merely a means to escape all the antagonism pointed towards Rockefeller, as his company, through dishonorable ways, grew prodigious enough to have considerable hold over the economy of America. But others insisted Rockefeller never did anything shifty or duplicitous. “We have abundant evidence that Rockefeller's consistent policy was to offer fair terms to competitors and to buy them out[...]his wealth was ‘the least tainted of all the great fortunes of his day.’” (Latham, Earl) Rockefeller himself despised people who only worked for gaining affluence and prosperity, declaring, “I know not nothing more despicable and pathetic than a man who devotes all the hours of the waking day to the making of money for money’s sake. ”(Bearded Colonel)…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Carnegie and the “Gospel of Wealth”.) The human life change in many positive ways during the…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Robber Barrons

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To what extent was it justified to characterize the industrial leaders of the late 19th century as either “robber barons” or “captains of industry”?…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays