Preview

John Mill on Free Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
965 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Mill on Free Speech
In this essay I will attempt to elaborate on John Stuart Mill’s view on Free Speech while also discussing how the opposing side would argue his view on the topic. In this specific topic Mill addresses whether people should be allowed to persuade or limit anyone else’s expression of opinion. Mill argues that everyone should share the equal opportunity of free speech. He supports his theory with four arguments. Mill’s first view is that it is wrong to silence one’s opinion. Actually he would also say that keeping one from speaking their opinion is evil. The reasoning behind his theory is that it is evil to take one’s free speech because if the silenced opinion is even possibly true, then one would be robbed from the truth. Sometimes in order for the truth to be fully understood we must take a look at what is not the truth to help support the real truth. For example, lets say as being the truth that immigration reform would be good for the economy according to democrats. On the other hand the republicans would do and say anything to silence the democrats from convincing people that it could actually be true. This is because they completely oppose the idea that immigration reform could be good for the economy.
Mill would then go into the second argument that if you silence someone’s opinion then one would be losing on what is the partial truth. Since the opinion on any subject is sometimes not the whole truth but it is only a combination of opinions that the remainder of the truth has any chance of being supplied. For example, two people at a crime scene are asked to explain what happened. Each person explains what they think they saw but don’t realize that they only saw half of the crime. Because of this what they think is true actually isn’t, however each investigation helped combine to form the full explanation of what happened. Following is the third argument by Mill. If the opinion is entirely true, yet is not fully and honestly contested, then it will,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill was considered a Utilitarian. The philosophy of Utilitarianism is that an action should be decided by what is best for society. Mill’s philosophy was in part developed by his upbringing as a child. His childhood was restricted and he was raised in an enviroment where is emotionally needs were not met. Also his father was a friend of Jeremy Bentham. Bentham was a philosopher credited with starting the beginings of the Utiltarianism philosophy. He focused on the relationships between the social classes and working towards social reform. His philosophy focused more on social conditions and human behavior than previous philosophies had. He looked at practical solutions for societies problems and less on the metaphysical aspects…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through out “Utilitarianism” Mill, argues that happiness is the only basis of morality, and that mankind only desires happiness. His argument is supported by the declaration that all people need is either means to happiness or what is included in the meaning of happiness. Which is defined as “Good fortune, pleasure, contentment and joy” Mill believes that the only reason justice exists is because of utility and that our free will/rights only exist because it is necessary to human happiness. This…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Stuart Mill once said, “The amount of eccentricity in a society has generally been proportional to the amount of genius, mental vigor, and moral courage it contained. That so few now dare to be eccentric marks the chief danger of the time.” John Stuart Mill is one of the most prominent English-speaking philosophers during the 19th century. His works incorporated a huge range of topics in his articles and papers he has written, in which a few of them include A System of Logic, On Liberty, and Utilitarianism. Mill’s main goal when composing On Liberty was best seen by taking a gander at how he talked about his work in his Autobiography. Mill composed that he accepted On Liberty to show the significance to man and to the society, of an extensive variety on sorts of character, and the opportunity given to human instinct to extend itself in…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill begins his essay by expressing a concern with the amount of control that society can exert over an individual 's liberty. Mill is afraid of the "the tyranny of the majority"1 and suggests that one should protect himself not only from the tyranny of the state itself, but also from the prevailing opinions of the majority. He says that the opinions of the majority become the rules and laws…

    • 2441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This results in Mill’s claim that a Government’s sole responsibility is to represent the interests of its people: “Those interests, I contend, authorize the subjection of individual spontaneity to external control only in respect to those actions of each which concern the interest of other people” (On Liberty 139). He claims that there are certain situations where it is better to have legal remedies than condemning people morally. In these instances he believes Government to be beneficial to society as it promotes the higher good of freedom. Furthermore, he asserts that laws should be made to protect people from engaging in actions that have been tried since the beginning of time and have proven to be harmful (On Liberty 141).…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill’s first argument is that suppressed opinion has the possibility of being true, which is why no idea can be dismissed. Mill’s second argument is that people will not fully understand their own opinion if it is not debated. He claims in paragraph 21 that even if popular opinion is true, if it is not debated, it becomes “dead dogma.” This is because a person needs to be able to respond appropriately to objections about their…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mill's argues for the Harm Principle based on liberty. He says that liberty must be protected and that is why we must follow the Harm Principle. He argues for the Harm Principle based on freedom of speech. Basically, what I got out of it, he says that no matter how badly the speech may seem immoral, it should be allowed regardless. It might help to add that we learned that Mills is a libertarian. Overall, Mills thinks that the government should not coerce people in to not doing…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill vs Dworkin

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "I forego any advantage which could be derived to my argument from the idea of abstract right as a thing independent of utility. I regard utility as the ultimate appeal on all ethical questions; but it must be utility in the largest sense, grounded on the permanent interests of man as a progressive being". Mill does not argue that liberty is a right but rather that giving people liberty has beneficial consequences. Mill thinks that paternalism does not serve the utilitarian purpose (to provide the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people) because the extent that “the most ordinary man or woman” knows about him or herself “immeasurably surpassing” anyone else. Any effort from the state to interfere, even from good intention, tends to lead to “evil” rather than good, since no one knows or cares more about his own interest than himself. As a result, “Mankind are greater gainers by suffering each other to live as seems good to themselves, than by compelling each to live as seems good to the rest”. The state should not interfere at all, except for when the act can harm others (Mill’s Harm Principle).…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Devlin to Mill.

    • 1787 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill perceives only one instance in which society is justified in interfering with or limiting the freedoms of its adult members, that being to prevent harm to others. Though Mill would…

    • 1787 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Supreme Moral Principle

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Stuart Mill on the other hand believed that majority rules basically. He believes that some actions are justified on utilitarian grounds, utilitarianism. If one person has to suffer to entertain or please multiple others, so be it.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill would say that torture is acceptable if it increases the happiness of a greater amount of people than if the torture were not carried out. For example, if one prisoner had information that could free 1000 people from certain death and if by obtaining this information it would be highly probable that you could save these people's lives then I think he would say that torturing the prisoner is justified.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill writes this argument to appeal to the audience who entirely agrees with him. He approaches his thesis by attacking the conservatives as well as the misguided progressives. He refutes any possible opposite idea to his thesis. Mill uses the phrases such as "no one's idea," "no one should assert," "it would be absurd," "nobody denies" in order to confirm the accuracy of what he talks about and show that no other way of thinking can be accurate. Mill purposely uses these literary techniques because he writes for people who agree with him, otherwise, he would make his audience feel uneasy, or even angry.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill published Utilitarianism in 1861 in installments in Fraser's Magezine it was later brought out in book form in 1863. The book offers a candidate for a first principle of morality, a principle that provides us with a criterion distinquishing right and wrong. The unilitarian candidate is the principle of utility, which holds that "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happpiness. By happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain and the privation of pleasure."…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though, in the Charter of Rights, it is stated that the freedom of speech and expression can be limited or denied, depending if certain conditions are met, of which on is when the reputation or right of others is being tainted,…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apart from the concrete realities, freedom of speech is greatly desired and is vital to our way of life. History shows us, that we advance when our beliefs are challenged by the free exchange of ideas. Who can argue against this?…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays