John Locke's Account Of The Natural Origin Of Property

Analyzing the accounts of both Locke and Marx it was obvious that they both found a significance of work to human life. They both approached this account in different ways. Locke looked at this point through the account of the natural origin of property, while Marx’s discusses alienated labor. The two gradually started coming up with the same analysis that ownership eventually becomes detached from labor. Using the account of the natural origin of property Locke came up with the concept that the relationship that people have with their property differs from the relationship they have with other things in the world. The relationship a person has with their property is special because of the labor the person put into it. The other things people tend to have relationships with aren’t looked at as being extremely special because the person and the thing have nothing to connect them to one another. Whereas a person has the labor and time that he/she devoted into their property and that is what connects the two, creating a more solid and unique relationship.
The natural origin of property is
Doing something that is repetitive and mindless can be exhausting, and make everyday at work feel like a long day. After the worker is done for the day their main priorities become things such as sleeping, eating and having sex. Prioritizing these as important is what Marx describes as the account of animal .vs. human activity. The account of animal .vs. human activity is when a human feels like an animal when performing an human function. Which in this case the worker feels like an animal when working. Working is considered a human function. The account of animal .vs. human activity also relates to a worker feeling like a human when performing animal activities. For instance, the worker feels human only when eating, sleeping, and having sex which is are considered animal