Preview

John Locke And Karl Marx On Private Property

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1992 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Locke And Karl Marx On Private Property
The action of trade is so heavily integrated into today’s modern society that it is hard to believe a time where trade did not exist. In can be found in the preliminary stages of North American culture where natives would trade with one another before the creation of currency, to a more modern level where society trades their labour to create a product or service in exchange for a wage. The discussion on private property is one covered by many different scholars throughout the years; this essay will focus primarily on the workings of John Locke and Karl Marx. Both being raised in a different time thus different upbringings has resulted in a difference in their train of thought and philosophical approaches on life. Karl Marx has been forced to endure the after math of the Industrial Revolution, where fewer people were needed to work on lands and factories/machines took over what was once human labor. John Locke; otherwise known as the father of classical liberalism, on the other hand came in a much different area although not far off from Marx, a time before the industry evolution. …show more content…
By delving deeper into the philosophical understandings surrounding private property for both Karl Marx, who holds a communist approach, and John Locke, holding a more capitalist approach; an analysis of the similarities they share along with the differences will be conducted by analyzing common property, private property in regards to the government/state, and societal structure surrounding

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rousseau's state of nature had no private property. Private property was something which arose from the stages leading up to the need for authority. Where Locke saw property as something which was naturally protected in the state of nature, Rousseau conceived of property –the result of greed, competition and vanity- as humanities reason for abandoning such a time and entering into the contract.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx’ theory of the relations of production can be used as an important platform in locating the origins of class and gender inequity to the early stages of capitalism. In his theory ‘the relations of production’ he explained that private ownership of…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Private property is arguably best justified by Locke’s labor theory of property. This is not…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke links the catalytic relationship between labor and property by citing a laborer as taking property “…out of the hands of nature…thereby appropriated it to himself.” (p. 20, $29) Thus, if anything requires labor, whatever the labor applies to, becomes the property of the person by association. The theory comments on Locke’s era of feudalism and refuting the lord-serf relationship. By this definition of private property, the land and the products produced belonging to the lords would then be the private property of each serf because the serfs are the faction laboring on the…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Main Thing Is That The People Wanted To Practice There Religion And The King Wanted To Have Everything Saying Screw The Tea Party They Wanted To Be Free And King Didnt Let Them To That. And The Social Contract Yes. John Locke‘s famous treatise, Declaration of the Rights of Man, describes his philosophy of ‘life, liberty, and the right to own property‘. This concept led to the ideal of a social contract, where the ruler is subject to the will of his people. In context on the American Revolution, Locke provided a basis for the war advocates, who stated that as the King of England violated their social contract, so too should they be free from him. Locke‘s idea circles around and creates the central, unifying idea of…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ownership is a huge theme in John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government. When our Founding Fathers were inspired by John Locke’s theories, they have never believed how this nation would result into be. John Lock expresses in his work that one owns their property if one works for it. He also writes about how when someone enters a state of war, then both parties have the right to fight for what they believe in. Now, that Americans live in a society where their liberties and freedom have taken away, is it possible to break away? For John Lock, he believes that is impossible to break away from a government or society because one was born into a government and by default one must obey our fathers.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke presents several key ideas in his Treatise; his notions on the origins of property, usurpations, tyranny, and the dissolution of government provide the key arguments for this work. The chronologically first, Of Property, discusses Locke’s theories on the origins of property. He claims that in nature, what makes something the property of one man as opposed to all mankind is the labor he puts into it. He has right to all he can use without letting withered, and should he chose; he may barter what is left for something that will not perish. Locke believes this to be the origin of money.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In John Locke’s time of influence, he made a strong impact on many people’s idea of life. He was a strong advocate for the idea that each human had a purpose and they are given many rights from their first breath. In the eyes of Locke, the Natural Rights Philosophy was that all living things should have laws pertaining to their own lives and these laws serve for the preservation of their existence and that no one should stand in the way of any human achieving these rights. In correspondence with him establishing these ideas, many people agreed with this theory and expanded upon it. The Declaration of Independence and the foundation of our Government had many strong connections with the ideas that Locke established in his Natural Rights Philosophy. With his views being exhibited to many, it was clear that he was very impactful to the Declaration of the Independence. Many topics stated in the Preamble were supportive and in favor of the viewpoints of Locke’s Natural Rights Philosophy.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Questions regarding one’s right to ownership of land and property has been an issue much discussed, debated and responsible in creating a stir of conflict in the attempt to find a conclusive answer on subject. In John Locke’s Second Treatise on Civil Government, published in 1690, Locke addresses the matter in question in the fifth chapter titled: ‘Of Property’. In his work, Locke builds an argument that displays how an individual obtains an ownership of property by means of labor. Locke is able to justify his position on the point at issue through the word of God and through simplistic scenarios he illustrates to his reader. Moving forward, in 1874, Chief Seattle conducted a powerful speech to Govenor Isaac Stevens and to the nation, a speech…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marx and Engels are against private property and want to abolish the class system and the exploitation relationship between bourgeoisie and proletariat from the DL, and to achieve the ideal communist society that people have the idea of shared property. They believe the DL is what creates the division of people into social classes and is a result of the subordination of one over another through ownership. The DL, the class system, and the privatization of private property are abolished in a communist society that is the collective ownership of surplus, so the communism is the only way to achieve equality. People have freedom to do what they are pleased without forces from ruling class when the DL is abolished, which is an utopian ideal that…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    marx and carnegie

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By eliminating the gap between rich and poor, Marx believes Communism should replace the economic system of Capitalism. In his perspective, he claims, “They have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Working men of all countries, unite” (Marx 476). Because he sees the Capitalist system exploits workers who are unfairly treated, he asserts that the proletarians should become the ruling class. The principle of Communism is the ideology of collectivism. Marx states, “Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society: all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labor of others by means of such appropriation” (470). This means that no private property should be allowed, and no one has even a less or more power in a Communist society. Because Marx illustrates the property ownership would enhance greed, and ambition to win in the…

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Js Mills Conformity

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The wealth of a nation stems from its labor force (ability, quality, number), which is important because the more production there is; the more there is to trade. Smith shows his opposition to mercantilism that was existent when he was writing this text; however, he gives an account of a social dynamic that is deeply embedded in human nature. He develops the idea of the division of labor and how this particular partition can lead to the prosperity of a state by producing a surplus of goods and services that can later be exchanged in the economic market. It is also important because it brings to light the significance of individualism versus membership in a community; division of labor shows that it is most ethical for economic thought to focus on individual well-being. The division of labor in industries has lead to increased worker skill (dexterity), increased efficiency, and improved machinery.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Modern political economic theory and philosophy can be greatly attributed to the works of two men who seemingly held polar opposite views on the subject. Adam Smith, a Scottish philosopher, published his most well known work An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations in 1776 and is most often associated with the ideas and principles of the political economic system known as Capitalism. At the other end of the spectrum is Karl Marx; the German philosopher most often associated with Communism and the author (or co-author) of The Communist Manifesto. This paper seeks to discuss the core differences in their respective political economic philosophies with regards to what economic value is and what the role of government should be in their versions of political economy. This will conclude with the argument that while Smith's work had laid the foundation for modern economic philosophy, it was Marx who would ultimately leave the most significant impression upon the world with his revolutionary ideas.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book, “Communist Manifesto,” Marx stresses the importance of communism or the publication of private property. As stated above, John Locke was the influencer of human basic rights, which included the right to own private property. The development of the Capitalist soon came after this right was made. Capitalists were key contributors to the rise of the industrial revolution but also to the fall of small shop owners. These shop owners were without income and the only way to provide a source was by working for these wealthy owners. A clear distinction between these two types people was their level of income and property which brought on the social classes. There was an oppressor and the oppressed. Before I go further with any explanations, this picture here of classes shows that only one class is progressing. The oppressor is the class that prospers in context of human progression through technological advancements. “Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other- bourgeoisie and proletariat (Marx 9).” The bourgeoisie were the capitalist while the proletariat was the lower working class. Separation between the two came along with the industrial revolution. Romanticist like Marx would oppose this as human progression because as a whole we aren’t all included in this promotion. It seems as the Capitalists are being set up on a pedestal…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays