Preview

Jfk Majority Opinion Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
411 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jfk Majority Opinion Analysis
Thomas Maxwell
4A
Current Event #4

Back in October Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy gave a nearly irrelevant opinion. The case being about Civil Rights of a jury and his opinion being about the inadequate conditions faced by the inmates in solitary confinement. At the same time Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas disapproved of Justice Kennedy’s claim and went as far as to say “a far sight more spacious than those in which his victims,” regarding to how the conditions of these prisons are much better than the alternative of being in a coffin. The article then goes to mention the many instances that Supreme Court Judges use their power of writing dissenting opinions, and how certain legal historians such as Melvin Urofsky have realized …show more content…
An opinion that a Supreme Court Justice may write regarding a court case’s verdict that the particular justice doesn’t agree with due to how they feel the constitution should be interpreted. Other opinions that are given are Majority opinions- which are what the majority of the justices agree should be the verdict, and Concurring opinions- which are given by justices that agree with the majority opinion but have other reasons why they think their opinion is correct due to the different ways the justices interpret the constitution. Other concepts brought up in the article were the ideas of judicial activism- when a justice makes a decision based on what they personally feel rather than judicial restraint- when a justice makes a decision based strictly on current laws.

Justice Kennedy gave his opinion on the case about Civil Rights which protect citizens from discrimination using the due process clause of the 14th amendment. On the other hand, Civil Liberties are the rights given to citizens incorporated through the first ten amendments a.k.a. the Bill of Rights.

Lithwick, Dahlia. "‘Dissent and the Supreme Court,’ by Melvin I. Urofsky." The New York
Times. The New York Times, 24 Oct. 2015. Web. 13 Dec.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jfk 50 Analysis
    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jfk 50 Analysis

    (1888 PressRelease) A creative group of senior Nashville artists has just released "JFK 50: A Memorial Album" which honors and remembers President John Kennedy on the approaching 50th anniversary of his death. Nashville producer and two time Grammy winner, J. Aaron Brown, says the album is "a folksy blend of songs and narrations that will touch the hearts of all who experienced that tragic day in November 1963."…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay On How Did The Framers Of The Constitution Establish A Bicameral Congress
    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On How Did The Framers Of The Constitution Establish A Bicameral Congress

    The majority opinion announces the Court's decision and explains the reasoning on which it is based. The concurring opinion is written by a justice who agrees with the majority opinion. It either adds a point not made in the majority opinion or emphasizes an existing point. The dissenting opinion is written by justices who do not agree with the majority opinion.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For Review Questions Chapters 1 through 3 for The Legal Environment Today
    • 872 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For Review Questions Chapters 1 through 3 for The Legal Environment Today

    It is a court decision that furnishes an example or authority for deciding subsequent case involving identical or similar facts.…

    • 872 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Brethren Summary
    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Brethren Summary

    This shows through the cases each individual choses to hear, the way thereat their fellow justices, how they utilize their clerks, and how they vote. We start off with Burgers desperate search for a landmark case, he is obsessed with having a unanimous decision to show that the court, and he as a leader, remained strong. Almost in a continuation of the Warren courts desegregation rulings, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education brought the landmark decision facing the topic of busing and integration versus desegregation. It was very difficult for the justices to come to a unanimous decision especially with Black acting as a unbudging liberal strict constructionist. Eventually, visually every justice conceded a part of their opinion and a unanimous decision was reached for pro-busing, a liberal decision. The press, however picked up on how split the court really was, stated that it seemed like “two sets of views, laid side by side”. A large part of their chapter is dedicated to deliberation on overturning or turning to a narrower interpretation of Miranda v. Arizona, the exclusionary rule, and Mapp v. Ohio. The fact that none of those attempts were successful was another win for a liberal court that Burger had not envisioned. In 1970 many people are upset with the war in Vietnam, and with their government. This leads to Cohen v California regarding free speech, Clay v U.S.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mcdonalds Vs City Of Chicago Judicial Activism
    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mcdonalds Vs City Of Chicago Judicial Activism

    Judicial Activism is when the Supreme Court is willing to change the public policy that has been put into place. Judges who practice judicial activism are considered policy makers. Many of the laws that are passed often depend on what the society needs as a whole. As Pacelle stated in his book, “It is important to note that though many people equate judicial activism with…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case (4th Amendment)
    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Supreme Court Case (4th Amendment)

    -The court interpreted the plain view rule, for the offer it is a risk but after…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary Of My Own Words Ginsburg
    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Summary Of My Own Words Ginsburg

    Unless moral judgment is involved, the cost of enforcing the criminal code might well be employed in other areas.” (22) Her later jurisprudence would reflect this attitude. Of Justice Ginsburg, it is said: “Always, she pays careful attention to the history and purpose, fairness and effectiveness, of the rules that shape and direct our justice system. Throughout her speeches and writings, she includes “sideglances” at the justice systems of sister democracies for the light they shine on our own and offers homage to the waypavers and the pathmarkers who have improved our world through law.” (193) These “sideglances” are seen in sections such as one discussing Brown vs. Board of Education and another from a speech discussing the value of diversity.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Research Process Notes: Personal Freedom and Bill of Rights
    • 271 Words
    • 1 Page

    Research Process Notes: Personal Freedom and Bill of Rights

    1. civil liberties : personal rights of citizens guaranteed by the First Amendment.
3.freedom of speech :first Amendment guarantee that Congress will not limit the free expression of individuals…

    • 271 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil Liberties Vs Civil Rights Research Paper
    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Civil Liberties Vs Civil Rights Research Paper

    In reality, though they lead to confusion, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties are different. Indeed, most of the Civil Liberties derived from the Bill of Rights while the Fourteenth Amendment is the location where the Equal Rights are found. Furthermore, Civil Liberties are specifically applied on an individual (right for a fair trial) whereas Civil Rights concern whether an individual or a group (right for the young of eighteen-year age to vote). Finally, Civil Liberties are individual rights that the government cannot infringe by using the law. In opposition, Civil Rights are rights that the government must ensure under the…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Wolff V. Mcdonnell
    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wolff V. Mcdonnell

    The criminal justice system realizes that inmates do have some rights, however it is also recognized that those inmates do have less rights than free citizens. Taking away some rights of the inmates is a valid punishment and by restricting these rights it helps in maintaining security in prisons. The title of the case that I chose was Wolff v. McDonnell. This case was very important because it uniformed certain rights and freedoms within correctional facilities. “Although inmates received some procedural safe-guards to protect them against the notorious abuses of disciplinary meetings, they did not receive all the due- process rights of a criminal trial” (Clemens, 2002). Nor did the Court question the right of correctional officials to revoke the good time of inmates. In this case, “Robert O. McDonnell, a prisoner, had filed a class- action suit against the state of Nebraska, claiming that its disciplinary procedures, especially those pertaining to the loss of good time were unconstitutional” (Clemens, 2002). McDonnell also complained, along with other inmates, about the limitations on their access to the law library, legal services, and visitation with the inmate legal assistant and that the regulations regarding prisoners ' mail violated the attorney-client privilege” (Keenan, 2005). This case was argued on Argued April 22, 1974 and a decision was made on decided June 26, 1974.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Clarence Thomas
    • 3655 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Clarence Thomas

    In the annals of American history, this name has risen to the forefront of noted Supreme Court Justices and has become synonymous with the ideals and philosophies of uncompromising conservatives. Undeniably, the same name also congers thoughts of hypocrisy, desertion, and self-denial toward one of America 's most divisive and enigmatic political figures. Since his nomination by President George H. Bush to the United States Supreme Court, Justice Thomas has been inundated with criticism by those who oppose his expressed jurisprudence and with praises by those who follow his hard-nosed, unapologetic style of governance in his role as America 's second African-American Supreme Court Justice.…

    • 3655 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Judiciary Branch
    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Judiciary Branch

    Before comparing the works of writing and the writers’ opinions, it is necessary to know the basic facts about the organization and function of the judicial branch. A key point about this branch is that it is completely split up and organized in such a manner that if a case is appealed in a lower court, it may be brought to a higher court, and so on if necessary. Both court systems, State and Federal, have a series of courts within themselves as well. Above these courts is the Supreme Court, which is the highest court a case may be presented to in our government. This major court is comprised of one Chief Justice and eight Associate Judges, and functions on the basis of seniority. Lower State and Federal court systems must request for judicial review before the Supreme Court may even review the case at hand by deciding if the case is unconstitutional. Not…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Activism In Canada
    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Judicial Activism In Canada

    By making decisions regarding the interest of the society the courts assume responsibilities that belong exclusively to the legislative and executive branches of government. The Supreme Court justices may rule based on what is in their best interest while saying that they are deciding for the good of the society. Moreover, when the Supreme Court justices are appointed, not elected, they may not be the representatives of the public’s view. As a result, judges begin making policy decisions about social or political changes society should make and become “unelected legislators.” By freely interpreting the meaning of the Constitution, the communities’ confidence in the Supreme Court will be undermined. When judicial activism in the Supreme Court wields too much power, it can eventually destruct the essence of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Right to Counsel
    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Right to Counsel

    The right to counsel is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. It provides for counsel in phases of a criminal proceeding for anyone who cannot afford one. This wasn’t always the case. Early colonial days did not allow defendants the opportunity to hire their own attorney nor was one appointed. This right has been earned in incremental stages involving several precedent cases. Those cases include Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932), Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938), Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 321 (1972), and United States v. Wade, 388 U. S. 218 (1967). Today, counsel is guaranteed in all phases of critical pretrial events. Counsel is also guaranteed during post-trial sentencing procedures and in a first appeal to a conviction ensuring the presence, expert advice, and assistance at all stages of a prosecution (Kanovitz, 2010, p. 409).…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Judicial Activism
    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Judicial Activism

    The original intent of the Supreme Court was to accurately define what the law is. Meaning, that judges act as interpreters of the law, when the legal philosophy, or its application, is confusing. Judicial activism is the term used to define judges acting as lawmakers. Judicial activism violates the balance of powers set out in the state and federal Constitutions. It takes authority away from the elected legislature, and puts judges in the posture of both lawmakers and judge. When this occurs, people lose their right to representation. A choice example of judicial activism is the desire to incorporate international law into court decisions. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has proposed implementing such a practice, citing Founding Father and first Chief Justice John Jay as a…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics