Preview

Jf Lazenby the First Punic War Review

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
554 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jf Lazenby the First Punic War Review
J.F. Lazenby. The First Punic War: A Military History. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.

Great wars are nothing new to the history of any of civilization; they define and change the nations involved in drastic ways. The First Punic War was the single longest war in Roman history; one of, if not the greatest naval wars ever fought. It marked the beginning of Roman expansion beyond mainland Italy and set Rome on the path to Empire.
J.F. Lazenby's intent in writing The First Punic War: A Military History was "to present a narrative of the war with discussion of strategic and tactical issues where possible based on the ancient evidence and on such recent research as seemed to me significant."(x) In this context, Lazenby does an admirable job presenting the evidence as far as it is known. With the limited primary sources remaining today that pertain to the First Punic War, Lazenby provides detailed analysis and illustration of the size and scope of battles the tactical formations used, and what is known of ship technology of the period.
The first 3 chapters are used to lay a foundation upon which most readers can understand the historical context of the war. Lazenby first presents the evidence he uses to form his conclusions, second a brief analysis of the makeup of the Roman and Carthaginian militaries, and third he briefly puts forward the key factors that led up to the war. Throughout the entire book Lazenby heavily relies upon the most complete ancient account of the war available today written in the first 60 chapters of Polybius Book 1. However, he does mention the fact that one cannot take all of Polybius’ accounts at face value due to the fact that he was not even born until 30 years after the end of the war and never claims to have met anyone who participated in the war. (2)
The narrow focus of Lazenby’s work is perhaps his greatest short coming during his interpretation of the First Punic War. In so intently focusing on the specifics of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    a. The Punic Wars are considered one of the most important Wars in the entire history of Western Civilization. Why?…

    • 4407 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Punic Wars were three conflicts between Carthage and Rome. The first conflict was from 264-241 B.C. It grew out of an altercation between Messana and Syracuse. The Messanians asked Carthage for help and Syracuse asked Rome for help. The Strait of Messana, which separated the Italian Peninsula from Sicily, was important strategically, and both Carthage and Rome responded. The Punic army (Carthaginians) arrived in Sicily and mediated peace between the two and established a military base. When the Roman army arrived, they drove off the Punic army from the military base and war ensued (Columbia…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    On thermopylea and platea

    • 1303 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Today I shall be arguing and elaborating upon the thesis that the battle at Thermopylae was instrumental in insuring the victory at Plataea against the Persian army as it allowed for Greece to build up its army’s in preparation for the upcoming battle. I shall attempt to prove this statement by discussing various aspects of the battle of Thermopylae and the battle of Plataea such as battle tactics, size of the Greek and Persian armies and the overall intent and outcome of both battles.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal’s overall war strategy in Italy, or lack thereof, can be seen as a strong contributing factor to Carthage’s ultimate defeat in the Second Punic War. Livy describes, “Hannibal…without orders from the senate, crossed both the Alps and the Ebro.” Demonstrating his defiance of Carthaginian Government’s ambitions against Rome. Ultimately, Hannibal sought not to destroy Rome but to “create a balance of power with [her]” according to Fronda. This is to suggest that rather than conquer Rome, Hannibal wanted to be on the same playing field in order to deny them the opportunity to claim hegemony over the Mediterranean. The content of the Macedonian–Carthaginian Treaty further evidences Hannibal’s lack of intention to destroy Rome as, in multiple sections, it discusses how Rome will be treated and acknowledges their…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    From a snapshot of the Second Punic War, the Carthaginians defeated the Romans while under the consul of Gaius Flaminius. The battle is considered one of the largest and most successful ambushes in military history. The battle consisted of around 50,000 Carthaginian soldiers versus about 30,000 Roman soldiers. The aftermath of the battle produced well over 15,000+ lost soldiers for the Roman army while Hannibal only lost approximately 2,500 of his own. Despite the overview of the battle, much more can be examined when looking at the events leading up to the brilliant ambush set by…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Battle tactics are said to have changed over time. However, just the opposite is evident. Battle tactics are for anyone to use, but work best with military’s that are stable and continually training. In many cases, militaries throughout the world can be seen using the same tactics today as used in the 2nd Punic War particularly The Battle of Cannae. What make tactics improve so well is the repetition of both practicing in training and executing tactics on the battlefield. Battle tactics improved with the establishment of a professional military because, most soldiers who were now veterans could move up in ranks and understand how they were previously defeated in different battles.…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There have been three Punic wars. The wars was fought between Rome and Carthage from 264 BC to 146 BC. And if you are wondering, Carthage is a city in the coast of North Africa. Also they both were major powers at the time and these wars were caused by them both wanting to expand their empires. The first war ended in 241 BC and it was mostly over who could get the island sicily, which was in the water and that gave carthage the advantage. This is why Rome created the corvus, which won them this war.…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Punic Wars Research Paper

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first Punic War was fought over the control of Sicily and the Western Mediterranean. Since Rome was very agricultural they had an interest in Carthage, which was controlled more by sea power. In the first part of the war, Rome made an alliance with the town of Hieron in north-east Sicily. This was led by Claudius and Marcus Valerius Messalla in 263 BC. The Romans won more land in 262 BC with the towns of Segesta and Agrigentum. n 260 BC they defeated the Battle of the Lipari Islands . In 241 BC, Carthage signed a peace treaty under the terms of which they evacuated Sicily and paid Rome a large amount of money to settle for peace. The long war was costly to both powers, but Carthage was more severely struck. In 238 BC, Carthage suddenly fell into…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Punic War was a major turning point for Rome and its continued overseas expansion. The Romans drove the Carthaginians out of Spain, and then attacked Carthage itself. The Romans, led by Scipio Africanus, defeated the Carthaginians,…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Among the most renowned literary works are those of the ancient Greeks. Literary works by the ancient Greeks include historical documentation, along with tragedies based on conflicts. According to the historian Thucydides, the greatest conflict was the Peloponnesian war between the Athenians and Spartans, along with each of their allies. In the opinion of Thucydides, the Peloponnesian war was due to the growth of Athens and the fear, the growth caused in the Spartans and their allies (Thucydides, Book I, chapter I). Accounts of events by Thucydides, for Francis Cornford, are not merely historic, but rather works of art. The History of the Peloponnesian War according to Thucydides is artistic through carefully crafted speeches and captivating…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    He begins with the final fact of history on how the decision to remain in Rome came to be with a satirical and ironic undertone that after Camillus long oration of persuasion it came down to what he says was the ‘’chance remark of a centurion on duty’’. He clearly states of which words had convinced the Senate to accept the omen—‘’we might as well stop here’’ and his presentation of this part of history is undeniably truthful, although he might add in his sarcastic comments. Yet his judgement becomes impaired as soon as he begins to outline the city’s reconstruction. Now it may have been that the city was ill-planned, but Livy goes on about how ‘’nobody bothered to see that the streets were straight’’—it seems to be instead of a presentation of history, that he goes on a little rant of what could have been done to maintain the precious state that his beloved Rome was and he is unable to stop his prejudice of the city’s beauty. He describes Rome as a ‘’squatter’s settlement than a properly planned city’’ and it is clearly shown that Livy has also contribute bigotry comments into his presentation of history. Although Livy may have presented a very well written book of facts of Rome his judgement has been clouded by his passionate patriotic views of…

    • 4675 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pride In The Iliad

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The history of wars and battles can be dated back almost to the beginning of time and has since been a prominent motif in stories from various cultures and religions. Centuries later, descriptions of fighting styles to warriors to weapons, has greatly evolved. Despite the constant evolution of the ways fighting is portrayed, one thing has remained consistent over the years: the reason for initiating war. When a man’s pride is wounded, the idea that he will stop at nothing to restore it, can be seen throughout literature in many different cultures. Through the malicious and extravagant battles exhibited in The Iliad, the idea that vengeance is sought once an individual's pride has been harmed and can only be resolved by combat, is developed.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In The Trojan War: A New History, author Barry Strauss argues for the historical authenticity of the event that was immortalized in epic poetry and song from the Archaic and Classical periods of Greece, and later Rome. Strauss keeps these epic works in mind as he digs deeper in the site of what is believed to be the ruins of once was Troy, and provides a fresh outlook on the most memorable conflict of the late Bronze Age. I will analyze and critique the work of Barry Strauss on the subject of the Trojan War as presented in his book, The Trojan War: A New History. The background of the author will be explored before beginning the journey into commenting on his abilities as a writer in discussing the format of his prose, and the historical method Strauss used in his piece. This will culminate with a brief analysis on how his evidence was presented, before concluding remarks summarizing the critical view of the book.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Illiad Play

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The message the production of an Iliad is trying to make is that war is foolish as every war. Andrew Boyce’s destructed setting portrays the lost and ruined lives in the story. The informal, chatty tone echoes Homer’s use of simile, and makes parallels between modern life to the desires that irritated the Trojans and Greeks. Devita gets his message across by his conventional, balletic movements which express the ritual of war. Including the standout scene where the Poet loses it, representing the mindless killing of warriors.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Student-Athlete

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pierre Briant is a well-known and seasoned historian, who has filled the post of Professor of History and Civilizations of the Achaemenid World and the Empire of Alexander the Great at the College of France while continually presenting the historical literature community with works - often of mixed-reception by fellow historians - that date as far back as 1973. “Alexander the Great and his Empire” (circa 192 pages) is one of his more prominent contributions to historiography that has since its conception in 1974 been altered and revised roughly five times. While its namesake is that of the famous Roman conqueror, its agenda falls more so in line with placing Alexander’s conquest in the context of history of that period and in doing so analyzing the mass effect this process had and the resultant behavior of those involved. Through its inclusion Briants sets the stage for deeper and larger questions, stemming from “a territory that is very poorly sign-posted,”(Briant, p.24) such as:…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays