Preview

Jewish-Conservative-Euthanasia Within The Conservative Judaism Movement

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
270 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jewish-Conservative-Euthanasia Within The Conservative Judaism Movement
Jewish – Conservative - Euthanasia
Like the trend among Protestants, Jewish medical ethics have become divided, partly on denominational lines, over euthanasia and end of life treatment since the 1970s. Generally, Jewish thinkers oppose voluntary euthanasia, often vigorously, though there is some backing for voluntary passive euthanasia in limited circumstances. Likewise, within the Conservative Judaism movement, there has been increasing support for passive euthanasia (PAD).

Human life is precious and its preservation takes precedence over every other consideration. This includes the obligation to visit the sick and the permission to violate the Sabbath to help a person afflicted with a dangerous illness. It also includes the obligation
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Doe V. Delie Case Study
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Doe V. Delie Case Study

    However, there are instances where the governmental interests that might outweigh the incarcerated individual’s right to refuse medical treatment: preservation of life;…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Brock Examines Two Broad Lines Of Arguments Against Euthanasia
    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Brock Examines Two Broad Lines Of Arguments Against Euthanasia

    The beneficial consequences that may result from the legalization of euthanasia as proposed by brock are the following:…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    James Rachel's Arguments Against Active Euthanasia
    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages

    James Rachel's Arguments Against Active Euthanasia

    Euthanasia is a highly controversial topic in the field of medicine despite the American Medical Association currently endorsing one form of it. In order to explore the topic of euthanasia, I will put forth a case in which it is relevant. 80-year -old patient X is currently suffering advanced stages of pancreatic cancer. He is currently in a lot of pain despite being on the maximum amount of pain medication. Given his condition, patient X expresses that the pain is intolerable, and his last wish is to die painlessly and quickly.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Terry Schiavo's Argument Against Euthanasia
    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Terry Schiavo's Argument Against Euthanasia

    We know that euthanasia has existed for many years, dating back to some "Greek and Roman writings"(Mishara 1). However, not everyone agrees with the practice of euthanasia as it is a controversial subject due to some of its unfortunate association with negative events. For example, At the time of WWII, many children, disabled or handicapped, and elderly died in concentration camps in Nazi Germany as a form of euthanasia. Another example of how euthanasia has achieved its notorious reputation, is from Dr. Jack Kevorkian, who illegally helped over 130 "patients" die by injecting them with deadly medications(Mishara 2). However, euthanasia cannot be based only on negative cases or opinions, just as we cannot judge a book by its cover. Euthanasia has helped to supply many with a sense of relief, in knowing that they will no longer have to…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Euthanasia In 1984 By George Orwell
    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Examples Of Euthanasia In 1984 By George Orwell

    Medical News Today explains euthanasia as the act of consenting to the termination of one’s life legally through a doctor. Although the general idea of euthanasia is thought of as assisted suicide, this treatment branches into several different aspects. There is passive euthanasia, which is more commonly found in Physician Assisted Suicide, and there is active euthanasia that uses lethal substances to end one’s life. The majority of controversy surrounding this topic is actually caused by the active form of euthanasia.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia vs. Nazi's Context of Euthanasia
    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Euthanasia vs. Nazi's Context of Euthanasia

    “Euthanasia Program” from the Holocaust Encyclopedia acknowledges the difference between “euthanasia” and what the Nazi’s context of “euthanasia” actually represented. According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary the definition for euthanasia (also known as mercy killing) is the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy. For the Germans they implemented a euthanasia program to eliminate the mentally and physically disabled individuals living in institutions throughout Germany and adjoined territories. Hitler deemed them as “life unworthy of life”. The Germans began by targeting disabled children in 1939. With a list that was reported by physicians, nurses, and midwives the health authorities encouraged the parents to admit their children to one of the clinics. Once the children were admitted to the pediatric clinics the staff would murder them by medication overdoses or starvation. Hitler then moved on to the killing of young adults and adults. Hitler used a questionnaire to identify who was suffering from mental or physical disabilities and who had been living in an institution for more than 5 years. Once the questionnaires were evaluated by medical experts, patients were removed from either their homes or institutions to be “euthanized” by gas chambers disguised as shower facilities. This went on from January 1940 to August 1941. From there Hitler continued his killings. He had German medical professionals and healthcare workers employ drug overdoses and starvation in institutions throughout the Germany. This went on until the end of World War II. Historians estimated that over 200,000 individual’s lives were taken by this Nazi’s form of euthanasia. Hitler’s euthanasia program was an intro to his genocidal tendencies that extended to the destruction of what he deemed unfit, like the Jews and Gypsies. Death by drug overdoses, starvation, and gas chambers does…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Ethical Dilemma of Euthanasia
    • 5176 Words
    • 21 Pages

    The Ethical Dilemma of Euthanasia

    involves life and death issues. For over 2000 years it has been a prohibited medical…

    • 5176 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Active And Passive Euthanasia Summary
    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Active And Passive Euthanasia Summary

    Euthanasia has recently been an active topic of debate due to elevated rate of patients diagnosed with painful and incurable illnesses. In James Rachel’s article, “Active and Passive Euthanasia,” he speaks of the invalid and impractical practice of passive euthanasia, which is endorsed by the American Medical Association. For many that are unfamiliar, euthanasia is the practice of painlessly killing a patient who is suffering for a painful and incurable disease. Rachel emphasises the unclear difference between active and passive killing in the medical world. The topics I would like to analyze from the article are first, the difference between active and passive euthanasia and the many relevant and irrelevant factors associated…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Active and Passive Euthanasia - Paper
    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Active and Passive Euthanasia - Paper

    Abstract The traditional distinction between active and passive euthanasia requires critical analysis. The conventional doctrine is that there is such an important moral difference between the two that, although the latter is sometimes permissible, the former is always forbidden. This doctrine may be challenged for several reasons. First of all, active euthanasia is in many cases more humane than passive euthanasia. Secondly, the conventional doctrine leads to decisions concerning life and death on irrelevant grounds. Thirdly, the doctrine rests on a distinction between killing and letting die that itself has no moral importance. Fourthly, the most common arguments in favor of the doctrine are invalid. I therefore suggest that the American Medical Association policy statement that endorses this doctrine is unsound. (N Engl J Med 292:78-80, 1975) The distinction between active and passive euthanasia is thought to be crucial for medical ethics. The idea is that it is permissible, at least in some cases, to withhold treatment and allow a patient to die, but it is never permissible to take any direct action designed to kill the patient. This doctrine seems to be accepted by most doctors, and it is endorsed in a statement adopted by the House of Delegates of the American Medical Association on December 4, 1973: The intentional termination of the life of one human being by another -mercy killing is contrary to that for which the medical profession stands and is contrary to the policy of the American Medical Association. The cessation of the employment of extraordinary means to prolong the life of the body when there is irrefutable evidence that biological death is imminent is the decision of the patient and/or his immediate family. The advice and judgment of the physician should be freely available to the patient and/or his immediate family. However, a strong case can be made against this doctrine. In what follows I will set out some of…

    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Morality Of Euthanasia Analysis
    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Morality Of Euthanasia Analysis

    According to James Rachels, in his essay “The Morality of Euthanasia,” the American Medical Association’s Conventional Doctrine in Euthanasia is false. The Conventional Doctrine states that there are certain situations in which letting someone die or passive euthanasia is morally permissible, but killing a patient or active euthanasia is not. For instance, in many circumstances a doctor can withhold treatment and will do nothing wrong if the patient were to die, but if the doctor were to provoke the death of the patient then it would be morally wrong. Rachels’ final goal is not to take a stand on the rightness or wrongness of euthanasia but instead show that if passive euthanasia is morally permissible then active euthanasia is also morally permissible. (define euthanasia)…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Of Mice and Men
    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Of Mice and Men

    4 Jewish people believe that in some cases euthanasia is acceptable such as passive euthanasia; this is when you do not stop someone killing themselves even though you know they are going to kill themselves.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia in Canada
    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Euthanasia in Canada

    There is considerable debate today, both among the public and the politicians, about euthanasia. While the governmnt is hesitatant to venture into morals and ethics, it appears that euthanasia is gaining more press coverage, in light of the Sue Rodriguez and Robert Latimer cases. Indeed, the issue is difficult to resolve, and despite few advances, the government has enacted penalties in the Criminal Code to punish assisted suicide. Without reservation, euthanasia is illegal in Canada. Anincreasing number of people are turning to doctor-assisted suicide. As a result of a more liberal political arena, more people are agreeing that some form of euthanasia must be acceptable in specific circumstances. Politicians, and the courts, claim that the country is not yet ready for such a climate. The characterization of pro-euthanasia advocates by their counterparts as selfish, taking the easy way out, diserespectful of life, and challenging human dignity is misconstrued. Pro-euthanasia groups advocate self-dignity, personal choice, economic well-being, happiness, family support, and individual rights. The word euthanasia simply means good death, but has come to mean causing death with intent, whether by doing something (commission), or by omitting something(omission). Euphemisms of the pro-euthanasia movement, include "right to die", and "death with dignity". The term "passive euthanasia" is often applied to the withdrawal of useless treatment thatonly prolonging the dying of a person. This needs to be differentiated from withdrawing of something that is actually keeping them alive, the withdrawl of which actually causes their death. It has been pointed out that the pro- life lobby will be split and discredited if there is an insistence by some that all technological means must be used whenever possible to prolong life. No ethical doctor insists on the use of burdensome, ineffective of futile measure, commonly called 'disproportionate', when refused by the patient or…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia V. Assisted Suicide
    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Euthanasia V. Assisted Suicide

    Topics regarding taking the decision to deprive yourself or someone else’s life have always caused controversy, regardless of the religion, race or political parties; assisted suicide and euthanasia are not exception for this statement. Assisted suicide occurs when a physician gives all the pertinent information and mechanisms to the patient, giving him the needs tools to end his own life. In the other hand, euthanasia is when you terminate the life of a person who suffers from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, with the patient’s request. Nevertheless, there are other cases where some people want their life to be ended even if they do not have a incurable illness. Euthanasia can be either by taking actions, or by not doing what is necessary to maintain someone alive. “We question whether it is medicine 's role to give patients control over the timing and manner of death.” (Snyder)…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Death with Dignity
    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Death with Dignity

    Should a person have the choice of when they die if they are suffering from terminal disease? Most physicians and politicians would say, “No”; and most of Christianity agrees. Christianity teaches that euthanasia follows the same definition as abortion- it is murder. However, each individual’s opinion on this matter differs. One person may say it is wrong while the next would say it is morally acceptable. There are always two sides to every debate including this one.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Dying with Dignity (Euthanasia)
    • 2463 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Dying with Dignity (Euthanasia)

    The term, ‘Euthanasia' comes from the Greek words eu meaning good, and thanatos meaning death, and is known as mercy killing or assisted suicide, usually practiced on a terminally ill person. In some countries, euthanasia is legal and a third person can assist suicide under certain conditions. Many religions and medical practitioners opposed the idea of euthanasia and strongly claimed it to be illegal. The debate on euthanasia is expected to continue in the future because there are both pros and cons to euthanasia. (Sandhyarani, 2011)…

    • 2463 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics