3/7/14
Period: 4
Should the United States have Annexed the Philippines?
When America first acquired new Islands from Spain they weren't sure what to do with them. Cuba was granted semi-independence, but the Philippines was annexed because giving the Philipines back to Spain, or giving the Phillipines independence was out of the question. The annexation of the Philipines caused tenison in America being some 7,000 miles away. However, the United States should not have annexed the Philipines because Filipinos did not want to be governed by America, and back home Americans were just as unhappy with this. Annexing the Philipines was a bad idea because Filipinos did not want to be governed by America. This appeared unethical to the Philipines since they thought America was there to liberate them. William Jennings Bryan stated, "We had full knowledge that they were fighting for their own independence". (Document D) Even when troops were sent to the Philipines they refused annexation, and were forced which caused more violence. The best thing to do would have been to avoid conflict and leave the Philipines alone. In the United States the annexation of the Philipines was not favored by all Americans. These Anti-imperialist feared that taking the Philipines was a step towards creating an American Empire. Platform of the American Anti-Imperialist League wrote, "We hold with Abraham Lincoln, that "no man is good enough to govern another man without that other's consent." (Document A) The Anti-imperialist thought it was unjust to try and govern people who did not want to be governed by the party. If people started to fear the idea of America becoming a Tyrant than they should not have continued the Annexation. In the end, the annexation of the Philipines caused unhappiness in the both the Philipines and in the United States. Filipinos wanted idependence and Anti-Imperialist didn't want to take this from them. The United States should not have annexed the Philipines because Filipinos did not want to be governed by America, and back home Americans strongly opposed as well. America and the Philipines wouldn't have had tension years after if they would have let them be independent.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
This gave the US a reason to intervene and helped with the liberation of Cuba from the Spaniards which gave the US control of yet another island. The Platt Amendment was then signed it "gave the Unites States a way to control Cuba without running directly, by maintaining a submissive local regime" (Kinzer 42). Kinzer states that "Americans had to look to faraway countries, weak countries that had large markets and rich resources but had not yet fallen under the sway of any great power" (Kinzer 34). As a result they also invaded Puerto Rico because it was ruled by Spain however Puerto Ricans looked forward for American rule. On the 10th of December 1898 the Philippines were then bought off from Spain for $20 million dollars by then President McKinley. His reasons were that "there was nothing left for us to do but to take them all, and to educate the Filipinos and uplift them and Christianized them, and by God's grace do the very best we could for them ."(Kinzer…
- 674 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1898, the United States switched to imperialism by taking Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guam and Hawaii, then to make the mark, the Philippines. For the most part of history the United States of America was in opposition to the idea of taking and claiming colonies, they believed that colonies had the right to be self-governed. However, it was the motivation by the overproduction of economy that drove America into imperialism. Cuba would become independent from Spain, with the intention that US occupation forces would eventually leave Cuba to become a free nation, as the Teller Amendment had promised. Also, the US would get Guam, a small Spanish island colony that the US had taken by surprise attack, as well as Puerto Rico. The people that were for annexing the islands argued that there were business interests in…
- 527 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There were many limitations of the Japanese immigrants, and the main issue was the language in schools…
- 325 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
the United States left the Philippines to themselves the result would be "anarchy and misrule"…
- 506 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
I firmly believe that the United States should have annexed the Philippines. I believe the United States should have annexed the Philippines because, if you how more power go take over countries and conquer them. Also if you have places conquered you can deploy your army and troops to spots closer to the enemies and you’re a more powerful country so less countries will try to fight you if you are a major world power. The United States should have annexed the Philippines for more power.…
- 338 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Before the Philippines were even considered being annexed there were some debate on whether or not to annex them. The people that were for annexing the islands argued that there were business interests in thoughts of new markets and fields of investments, the United States wanted to become an empire and so they wanted to expand more. USA, especially, didn’t want to lose these islands to Japan or Germany.But some people did argue against annexing the islands. One of the biggest things that stood out was that the islands were 6,000 miles away from the Pacific Coast. Another reason that people argued against this was that some senators thought that annexation was a violation of American tradition and this lead other people to follow them. Since the senators had power.…
- 724 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
At the time the decision to annex the Philippines was made, there were other countries waiting and ready to attack and takeover the control that Spain had lost to the Americans. American rule allowed human rights, freedoms and quality of life that would not have been possible had America walked away and allowed the fledgling country try and rule itself. Germany, England, Japan and even Spain would have jumped at the opportunity to take over control of the Philippines and its many resources. Many important and profitable trade routes utilized the Philippines as a gateway to trade their goods and wares. Although it was profitable for the Americans to control this area and have access to the trade routes and resources, they were helping prepare the Filipinos to one day self rule and govern themselves as a free and independent country. Definitely not an opportunity they would…
- 921 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
We helped them gain independence from Spain, however “we had full knowledge that they were fighting for their own independance” (Document D). The leader of their army was Emilio Aguinaldo, who was very helpful in winning the war. However, when we won, we refused to let him march with our armies. He was going to use his armies to rebel against us. Having a rebellious territory would do no good for the United States. We would lose things like trade, military help, and peace. We could keep all of those things if we gave them independence, and formed an alliance. If we annexed them, it would do more harm than good, as we would have to fight our own rebelling territory like we did in the Civil War.…
- 506 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Booker T: One of the causes of imperialism about nationalism and social Darwinism is that imperialist feel a moral duty to spread their culture to peoples they feel inferior. Also you’re group is trying to take Philippines.…
- 350 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Around 1900, imperialism became the most talked about issue within the United States. After the Spanish-American war ended and the U.S. gained many Pacific islands as a result, most Americans became concerned over whether to annex the Philippines or not. The Americans who wanted to annex the Philippines believed that they were in there as legally as the citizens themselves. Taking them was not wrong at all, nor was it violating the Declaration Of Independence (Doc 6). Albert…
- 279 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Many problems were created because of imperialism. Some of those problems were political problems. Henry Cabot Lodge said that the Philippines "have never known liberty"(Doc.6). Many people such as politicians thought that some territories were easily influenced by the concept of imperialism because of many journalists. Henry Lodge's statement is not true because the invasion of our country is the exact opposite of letting liberty into our country. The…
- 535 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
4. Racist beliefs fueled many of the imperialist policies applied to Cuba and the Philippines. In the face of new foreign policies that enabled Americans to become an overseas colonial and commercial power in the Caribbean, in Latin America, in the Pacific Islands, and in Asia, not all Americans agreed with imperialism, and many were quite vocal in their opposition.…
- 673 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The negative side and reasons why imperialism wasn’t very legitimate was what happened in the Philippines. President McKinley had the best intentions of transforming this country in to a civilized one. He knew that he shouldn’t give it up to Spain again, nor leave it up to Germany or France that were the commercial rivals; so he…
- 470 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The two main ways of land gain for the United States was through expansionism and imperialism. These two means have several striking similarities between them. For instance, both of these policies led to conflicts. During expansionism, the main logic behind new statehood was to have the upper edge for free or slave states. Of course, this desire to gain as many free or slave states as possible led to such conflicts as Bleeding Kansas, where free and slave advocates flocked to Kansas in order to decide whether Kansas would allow or ban slavery. While the U.S. was imperializing, conflicts also took place rather frequently. In the Philippines, Emilio Aguinaldo led a two-year revolt against American forces in order to become free from American reign. Racism was also a key similarity between expansionism and imperialism. When Americans began to establish states as they moved westward, they had no consideration for Native Americans andconsidered them to be extremely invaluable. The exact same thing occurred about onehundred years later, with the “criminal aggression” that took place in the Philippines. TheAmerican Anti-Imperialist League argued that the blood of the Filipinos was onAmerican hands, and we more deeply resented this betrayal. Just about everybody whowas not a white, Anglo-Saxon protestant was discriminated against. The foreign policiesthat…
- 988 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
As a house spouse I am opposed to my son, atmosphere his toes on every different soil. I believed that it was effortlessly unsuitable for the U.S. To manipulate the fate of alternative people and other countries. As an, Anti-imperialists I very so much cared about the USA which satisfied many who they would act within the excellent interest of its men and ladies. I am worried about its traditions, fate, protection, home, and, international policies. America must get out of the Philippines, 'We preserve that the policy referred to as imperialism is adversarial to liberty and tends towards militarism, an evil from which it has been our glory to be free. We remorse that it has emerge as valuable in the land of usa, and, the Philippines to reaffirm…
- 240 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays