Topics: Stock market, Stock, Financial markets Pages: 28 (9080 words) Published: March 30, 2013
Agency Costs of Overvalued Equity
Michael C. Jensen*
I define and analyze the agency costs of overvalued equity. They explain the dramatic increase in corporate scandals and value destruction in the last five years; costs that have totaled hundreds of billions of dollars. When a firm’s equity becomes substantially overvalued it sets in motion a set of organizational forces that are extremely difficult to manage—forces that almost inevitably lead to destruction of part or all of the core value of the firm. WorldCom, Enron, Nortel, and eToys are only a few examples of what can happen when these forces go unmanaged. Because we currently have no simple solutions to the agency costs of overvalued equity this is a promising area for future research.

In the past few years, we have seen many fine companies end up in ruins and watched record numbers of senior executives go to jail. And we will surely hear of more investigations, more prison terms, and more damaged reputations. Shareholders and society have borne value destruction in the hundreds of billions of dollars.

What went wrong? Were managers overtaken by a fit of greed? Did they wake up one morning and decide to be crooks? No. Although there were some crooks in the system, the root cause of the problem was not the people but the system in which they were operating—a system in which equity became so dangerously overvalued that many CEOs and CFOs found themselves caught in a vicious bind where excessively high stock valuations released a set of damaging organizational forces that led to massive destruction of corporate and social value. And the problem was made far worse than it had to be because few managers or boards had any idea of the destructive forces involved.

I. What is Overvalued Equity?
Equity is overvalued when a firm’s stock price is higher than its underlying value. And the problems I shall be discussing today arise not when there are small overvaluations, but when there is substantial overvaluation, say by 100 or 1,000%. By definition, an overvalued equity means the company will not be able to deliver—except by pure luck—the performance to justify its value. If it could it would obviously not be overvalued.

To my knowledge, with the exception of Warren Buffett (who hints at these forces in his 1988 letter to Berkshire shareholders)1 no leaders in the business and financial community have Copyright © 2005 Michael C. Jensen, All Rights Reserved.

“We do not want to maximize the price at which Berkshire shares trade. We wish instead for them to trade in a narrow range centered at intrinsic business value…Charlie Munger and I are bothered as much by significant overvaluation as significant undervaluation.” Warren Buffett, Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report, 1988.

This paper is drawn from my Keynote Lecture to the October 2004 Financial Management Association New Orleans Meetings.The first version of these ideas was presented at the European Financial Management Association, London, June 2002, see Jensen (2004). I am indebted to Joe Fuller, Kevin Murphy, Harry and Linda DeAngelo, Jeff Skelton and Eric Wruck for conversations on these issues and to Editors Lemma Senbet, Jim Seward, and Alex Triantis, and anonymous referees for suggestions *

Michael C. Jensen is the Jesse Isidor Straus Professor, Emeritus, Harvard Business School and is the Managing Director of the Organizational Strategy Practice, Monitor Group in Cambridge, MA. Financial Management • Spring 2005 • pages 5 - 19


Financial Management • Spring 2005

recognized the dangers of overvalued equity. Nor have they publicly acknowledged their frequent contributions to creating this overvaluation.
Almost 30 years ago when Bill Meckling and I wrote our original paper on Agency Theory (Jensen and Meckling, 1976), we defined agency costs as the costs associated with cooperative effort by human beings. We focused on the agency costs arising when one entity, the principal, hires another, the...

References: Aghion, P. and J.C. Stein, 2004, “Growth vs. Margins: Destabilizing Consequences of Giving the Stock
Market What It Wants,” Harvard Business School Working Paper
Baker, M., J.C. Stein, and J. Wurgler, 2003, “When Does the Market Matter? Stock Prices and the Investment
of Equity-Dependent Firms,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 203-218
Baker, M. and J. Wurgler, 2002, “Market Timing and Capital Structure,” Journal of Finance 57, 1-32.
Belson, K., 2005, “WorldCom’s Audacious Failure and Its Toll on an Industry,” New York Times, Jan. 18.
Cramer, J.J., 2002, Confessions of a Street Addict, New York, NY, Simon & Schuster.
Efendi, J., A. Srivastava, and E.P. Swanson, 2004, “Why Do Corporate Managers Misstate Financial
Statements? The Role of Option Compensation, Corporate Governance, and Other Factors,” Texas
Endlich, L., 2004, Optical Illusions: Lucent and the Crash of Telecom, New York, NY, Simon & Schuster.
Fama, E.F. and K.R. French, 1992, “The Cross Section of Expected Stock Returns,” Journal of Finance 47,
Fuller, J. and M.C. Jensen, 2002, “Just Say No To Wall Street: Putting A Stop To the Earnings Game,”
Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 14, 41-46
Glater, J.D., 2005, “Restatements, and Lawsuits, are on the Rise,” New York Times, January 20.
Graham, J.R., C.R. Harvey, and S. Rajgopal, 2005, “The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial
Reporting,” Journal of Accounting and Economics (Forthcoming)
Harrison, J.M. and D.M. Kreps, 1978, “Speculative Investor Behavior in a Stock Market with
Heterogeneous Expectations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 92, 323-336.
Heaton, J.B., 2002, “Managerial Optimism and Corporate Finance,” Financial Management: 31, 33-45.
Holmstrom, B.R. and S.N. Kaplan, 2003, “The State of US Corporate Governance: What’s Right and What’s
Wrong?” ECGI - Finance Working Paper
Jensen, M.C., 1986a, “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow: Corporate Finance and Takeovers,” American
Economic Review 76, 323-329
Jensen, M.C., 1986b, “The Takeover Controversy: Analysis and Evidence,” Midland Corporate Finance
Journal 4
Jensen, M.C., 1988, “Takeovers: Their Causes and Consequences,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, 21-48.
Jensen, M.C., 1989, “Active Investors, LBOs, and the Privatization of Bankruptcy,” Journal of Applied
Corporate Finance 2, 35-44
Jensen, M.C., 1993, “The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit and the Failure of Internal Control Systems,”
Journal of Finance 6, 831-880
Jensen, M.C., 2001, “Corporate Budgeting Is Broken: Let’s Fix It,” Harvard Business Review 79, 94-101.
Jensen, M.C., 2003, “Paying People to Lie: The Truth About the Budgeting Process,” European Financial
Management 9, 379-406
Jensen, M.C., 2004, “The Agency Cost of Overvalued Equity and the Current State of Corporate Finance
(2002 Keynote Lecture: European Financial Management Association, London),” European Financial
Jensen, M.C., K.J. Murphy, and E.G. Wruck, 2004, “Remuneration: Where We’ve Been, How We Got to
Here, What are the Problems, and How to Fix Them,” Harvard NOM Working Paper
Johansen, A. and D. Sornette, 2000, “The Nasdaq Crash of April 2000: Yet Another Example of LogPeriodicity in a Speculative Bubble Ending in a Crash,” European Physical Journal B 17, 319-328.
Jones, C.M. and O.A. Lamont, 2002, “Short Sale Constraints and Stock Returns,” Journal of Financial
Economics 66, 207-239
Kindleberger, C., 1978, Manias, Panics, and Crashes, New York, NY, Basic Books.
Lamont, O.A., 2004, “Go Down Fighting: Short Seller vs. Firms,” Yale ICF Working Paper, No. 04-20.
Lamont, O.A. and J.C. Stein, 2004, “Aggregate Short Interest and Market Valuations,” American Economic
Review 94, 29-32
Lamont, O.A. and R.H. Thaler, 2003, “Can the Market Add and Subtract? Mispricing in Tech Stock CarveOuts,” Journal of Political Economy 111, 227-268. Available from the SSRN eLibrary at:
Martin, D., 2005, Tough Calls: AT&T and the Hard Lessons Learned from the Telecom Wars, New York,
NY, Amacon.
McLean, B. and P. Elkind, 2003, The Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Scandalous Fall of
Enron, New York, NY, Penguin Group.
Moeller, S., F.P. Schlingemann, and R.M. Stulz, 2005, “Wealth Destruction on A Massive Scale? A Study of
Acquiring-Firm Returns in the Recent Merger Wave,” Journal of Finance (Forthcoming)
Myers, S.C. and N.S. Majluf, 1984, “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have
Information that Investors Do Not Have,” Journal of Financial Economics 13, 187-221.
Pastore, L. and P. Veronesi, 2004, “Was There a Nasdaq Bubble in the Late 1990s?” CRSP No. 557
Working Paper
Polk, C. and P. Sapienza, 2004, “The Real Effects of Investor Sentiment,” Northwestern University
Working Paper
Shleifer, A. and R.W. Vishny, 1997, “The Limits of Arbitrage,” Journal of Finance 52, 35-55. Available from
the SSRN eLibrary at:
Shleifer, A. and R.W. Vishny, 2003, “Stock Market Driven Acquisitions,” Journal of Financial Economics,
70, 295-311
Skinner, D.J. and R.G. Sloan, 2002, “Earnings Surprises, Growth Expectations, and Stock Returns or Don’t
Let an Earnings Torpedo Sink Your Portfolio,” Review of Accounting Studies 7, 289-312.
Sokolove, M., 2002, “How to Lose $850 Million—And Not Really Care,” New York Times Magazine, June 9.
Swartz, M. and S. Watkins, 2003, Power Failure: The Inside Story of the Collapse of Enron, New York,
NY, Doubleday.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay about Jensen (2005) Overvalued Equity
  • Jensen Shoe Essay
  • Jensen and Meckling 1976 Summary Essay
  • Jensen Corporate Objective Function Essay
  • Jensen Shoe Case Essay
  • Jensen Shoes Case Study Essay
  • Jensen Shoes Sample Case Essay
  • Jensen shoes Jane Kravitz story Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free