Rousseau argued that the progression of the sciences and arts has caused the corruption of virtue and morality. Rousseau claimed that the arts and sciences are born from our vices: he states, “Astronomy was born from superstition; eloquence from ambition, hate, flattery, and falsehood; geometry from avarice, physics from vain curiosity; all, even moral philosophy, from human pride.” Rousseau expressed that society had become more harmful than sophisticated, and society began to emphasize specialized talents rather than virtues such as courage, generosity, and temperance. Unlike Hobbes and many Catholic writers, he did not believe that society was inherently corrupt or bad. His initial ideas in “A Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts” are believed to be inspired by Françoise-Louise de Warens. His “A Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts” allowed Rousseau to gain fame and recognition, while laying the foundation for his next writing, “The Discourse on the Origin of Inequality”, which was written in response to this prompt: “What is the origin of the inequality among men and is it justified by natural …show more content…
In this primitive state, people were happy and there were no awas, no judges; all people were equal. Rousseau suggested that the earliest humans possessed a basic drive for self-preservation, and compassion and pity. Unlike animals, Rousseau illustrated that humans had free will and the potential for perfectibility. People came together, formed families, and this led to developments in agriculture, metallurgy, private property, and the division of labor, which created inequality. Neighbours began to compare their abilities and achievements with one another, and this furthered a divide. Ultimately, the work proclaims that by nature, humans are essentially peaceful, content, and equal, and that they had lost their liberty due to the