Jacksonian Democrats Vs Whigs Essay

In the Jacksonian era, the Democrats and Whigs differed in belief in the role of federal government in the economy. The Jacksonian democrats wanted a small federal government and more states rights and conservatives, whereas Whigs wanted a strong federal government with fewer state’s rights while being open to change. Although this branches of into more differences. They also differed in their beliefs of social reform. The Jacksonian Democrats were more located in the south, making slavery a necessity. Which contrasts to the Whigs who are based on the north’s belief of the inhumanity slavery brings upon the nation. These parties may have had differences, however, they agreed on tariffs. (thesis)
Of course, the difference between the 2 parties beliefs on federal government size are: Democrats want small and more states rights, and Whigs wanted larger federal government. However, the federal government plays a key role in the economy and the workforce. At the time, the Whigs supported a more industrialized and manufacturing version of the U.S. This was what they wanted the majority economy to come from, even though the Democrats were more invested in the agricultural aspect …show more content…
The Southern Democrats were all about agriculture, which made them prone to try and keep slavery around for the long haul in the United States. Without slavery, these states would have no economy and not be able to sustain any kind of work. These slaves were very important, even though there were many slaves, they were treated very poorly. This was unliked by the northern Whig party and many people protested these acts. In the north, manufacturing, and industry was the way of life. These people were not using slaves and shamed much of the south for using them. This created many of the disagreements that these two opposing parties faced. (synthesis: geographical &