Preview

Jack, Bert and Pratt

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
588 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jack, Bert and Pratt
Running Head: Criminal Law for Criminal Justice

Unit 4 Project: Jack, Bert, and Pratt
Criminal Law for Criminal Justice CJ230-01

In the situation to be discussed Jack tried to kill Bert but instead killed Pratt. He then tried again to kill Bert but his weapon suffered a malfunction and he got into his car, put the gun in the glove compartment and disappeared from the scene. After reading the textbook, I understood that an attempt is a failure, according to Professor George Fletcher. There are three elements that comprise a criminal attempt; an intent or purpose to commit a crime, an act or acts toward the commission of the crime, and a failure to commit the crime.
In the case, the court dismissed the charge of the attempt of murder of Bert because Jack could not have killed Bert due to the malfunction of his gun. The court was not right by dismissing the attempt murder charge because he had the intent to kill Bert and he even fired his weapon towards him but ended up killing Pratt. All the tree elements of an attempt were present plus it also meets the mens rea of attempt. It meets the mens rea because Jack intentionally performed an act that was proximate to the completion of a crime, and by possessing the intent or purpose to achieve a criminal objective. In addition meets the actus reus of attempt because he came extremely close to the commission of the crime. In addition he killed Pratt while pointing the gun at Bert with the intent to kill him.
In the other hand, the lawyer presented a factual circumstance that prevented Jack from actually completing the offense, which in some states statutes is called an extraneous factor or an event outside the individual’s control. Therefore the lawyer presented a factual impossibility argument due to the fact that the gun suffered a malfunction and even though it is not a defense to an attempt to commit a crime, the charge was dropped.

This scenario, to me, shows a complete attempt due to the fact that a



References: Lippman, M. (2007). Contemporary criminal law: Concepts, cases, and controversies (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Johnny and Ray

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One wouldn’t think that the lives of Johnny Cash and Ray Charles have anything in common. However, after viewing the movies Walk the Line, starring Joaquin Phoenix as Johnny Cash and Reese Witherspoon as June Carter, and Ray, starring Jamie Foxx portraying Ray Charles, their similarities are as striking as their differences. Both of these films are biopics chronicling the rags to riches lives of two of the most influential musicians whose careers began in the 1950s. Walk the Line is a love story depicting the courtship intertwined with the careers of Johnny Cash and June Carter. Ray is a docudrama centered around the career of Ray Charles. Cash and Charles enjoyed illustrious music careers, despite personal tragedies, illicit drug use, and the changing social landscape of civil rights.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prosecuting Arguments

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The prosecution must establish the facts and elements of each crime to prove a defendant's guilt. The elements of crime are the basic components of the crime, and the essential features of that crime specified by law or statute. These elements include actus reus, mens rea, and a concurrence of the two. To convict the defendant of a particular crime, the prosecution must establish that each of the required elements are present in the facts to prove criminal liability (Schmalleger, Hall, & Dolatowski, 2010). In the case of State v. Stu Dents, the prosecution must establish the facts and elements of the charges for homicide, assault of a police officer, kidnapping, burglary, and crimes related to drugs.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jack, Bert and Pratt

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages

    USLegal INC. (2010). Factual Imposibility Law & Legal Definition. Retrieved October 18, 2010, from US Legal.com: http://definitions.uslegal.com/f/factual-impossibility/…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justin King Answer

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Answer to Paragraph 2. Defendants do not have sufficient information or belief to enable them to answer said Paragraph and, on that ground, deny each and every allegation contained therein.…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Regina Knight Case

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order for a trial to be brought, the police and prosecutors might be able to prove that the elements of the particular offence are present. In this criminal case both Actus reus, Mens rea as well causation was clearly shown through the behavior of Katherine Knight.…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Appellant believes the court hindered his ability to provide a defense based on his alibi that he was not present at the scene of the crime when the fire occurred and that he claimed the fire resulted by way of accidentally leaving a hot plate on. The prosecution proved the appellant conspired to ignite the fire later when he was not present. Prosecution also proved that by pouring the accelerant around the hot plate with the power on, is not indicative of an accident. The defense must prove "impossibility of the accused's presence," for which the court found no basis for error in the original trial.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Roberson, C. & Wallace, H. (2008). Principles of Criminal Law (4th Ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cj227 Unit 4 Project

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since John was in custody, what are the procedural steps the police were required to take once John began to incriminate himself? The police have no obligation to stop John Doe from making any statements. “Excited Utterance” made by a defendant before being questioned are admissible as statements given under Miranda advisement. Once the police begin to question John Doe regarding the theft, then they are required to read or provide Mr. Doe with his Miranda Warnings. Miranda rights (Miranda rule, Miranda warning) n. the requirement set by the U. S. Supreme Court in Miranda v. Alabama (1966) that prior to the time of arrest and any interrogation of a person suspected of a crime, he/she must be told that he/she has: "the right to remain silent, the right to legal counsel, and the right to be told that anything he/she says can be used in court against" him/her. Further, if the accused person confesses to the authorities, the prosecution must prove to the judge that the defendant was informed of them and knowingly waived those rights, before the confession can be introduced in the defendant's criminal trial. The warnings are known as "Miranda Rights" or just "rights." The Miranda rule supposedly prevents self-incrimination in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution. Sometimes there is a question of admissibility of answers to questions made by the defendant before he/she was considered a prime suspect, raising a factual issue as to what is a prime suspect and when does a person become such a suspect?…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Liability

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The mens rea of this offence as stated in Savage is intention or recklessness as to causing v to apprehend iiuv.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ii. And result crimes (series of events) – a forbidden consequence results from the physical conduct (eg. A death). Usually you have to prove Mens Rea for all parts of the series of events (eg. Murder – intention to do the act and intention to cause death)…

    • 991 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Define how concurrence works with actus reus and mens rea to lead to criminal liability. Why is…

    • 429 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Attempt to commit murder

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The elements of murder are, the intention to kill, recklessness causing death, the intention of inflicting grievous bodily harm. The requirement of convicting someone of attempt to commit murder the People must prove that the defendant took at least one direct but ineffective step toward killing another person. A direct step is one that goes beyond planning or preparation and shows that a person is putting his or her plan into action.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the Postmaster case, the view of the court on common intention were that if for an act, both the accused are charged but each one is liable to the extent of his act only, then the charges framed against them will be for attempt only, as no more than that can be proved and they would be acquitted of…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first and foremost issue to be noted in this case is that of Francis carelessly shooting his gun in the direction of Nigel and also that of Nigel responding and in turn shooting towards Francis. Had Francis not fired his gun towards Nigel could there be a possibility that Nigel would not in turn shoot back at Francis causing Aiden to be wounded in the crossfire? Was Francis acting in this manner due to provocation from Nigel? Could it also be possible that Nigel reacted and shot back at Francis in self defence with the fear of being shot himself driving him? Could Nigel have fired back due to provocation from Francis? If these initial events had not happened is it possible that Aiden would still be alive today? Upon deciding to bring the victim to hospital, Nigel criticized Francis’s method of carrying Aiden (an issue which is not in clear violation of any law) leading to Francis abandoning Aiden and leaving the scene and Nigel carrying the victim in a very poor manner back towards to car. Had Francis continued carrying Aiden to the car, would this had meant that his medical condition would not have deteriorated due to poor care carried out by Nigel afterwards? Even though Francis did not shoot Aiden, would the fact that he assumed a liable role to help bring the victim to hospital, though not legally obliged to do so, but then decided to leave half way through render him guilty of breaking a law because he did not carry out the act of choosing to assist a victim in need of medical care to the best of his…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Law

    • 9386 Words
    • 38 Pages

    This chapter considers, in general terms, the elements of an offence which the prosecution must establish, beyond reasonable doubt, before a person can be convicted. Before you go any further please listen to audio presentation 2 which you can access from the criminal law page of the VLE. It is important that you do so as it will give you an overview of the topic and guidance on the terms considered in this chapter (i.e. actus reus and mens rea). You will now be aware that every offence is defined somewhere – either in a statute or at common law – and will be composed of a number of elements with which you should be familiar. Note that you should be equally familiar with the elements of each defence you consider as part of this course. The elements of an offence are the external elements (actus reus) and the internal – or mental – elements of the offence (mens rea) which are contained in the definition of that offence (which will be found either at common law or in a statute). The offence of criminal damage contrary to s.1(1) of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 is used to exemplify analysis of the actus reus and the mens rea of a criminal offence. Chapters 3 to 6 examine the general principles of actus reus and mens rea in more detail.…

    • 9386 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays