Italy, unlike all other countries, was the focal point during the Renaissance era, a time for rebith or Greek and Roman ideas. For so many reasons, Italy thrived during this period. The most obvious reason being, Italy was geographically in the center of the world. Then, there was the influence the church held over the people. Lastly, there was the political standing of those ruling Rome. These along with so many other ideas created a booming Renaissance eon.…
"Even though the renaissance had begun in main Italian city states by 1347, the rest of Europe was still basically Medieval in culture and outlook. Analyze how the Black Death put an end on to this medieval culture and hastened the development of the renaissance.”…
! The Italian City-State • What made Italy geographically unique? • How did the great Italian cities become the bankers of much of Europe by the fifteenth century? ! Growth of City-States • What assisted the growth of Italian cities and urban culture? • How did the merchant oligarchies become strengthened? • What were the five major competitive states in Italy? • What were their unique systems? • Who controlled the Papal States? • Why did the cities develop despotisms? Who ruled Venice? Oligarchy: a small group of people who together govern a nation or control an organization, often for their own purposes Despotism: rule by an authoritarian or tyrant…
Constantinople had been captured by Turks in 1453, which cut trade routes to East. Greek scholars fled to Italy with their classical knowledge and materials. ("end" of Middle Ages, "beginning" of Renaissance)…
In the Treatise on Law, Aquinas concerns himself with the origins of law. He wants to know the source of the obligation that law imposes. The questions are these: “By what warrant does the human legislator bind the consciences of people? Doesn’t this power belong to God alone? If people possess it, what are the limits within which they may exercise it?”…
Thomas Aquinas proposes a number of laws that exist in the world. He believes that God is responsible for eternal law. Aquinas points out that eternal law the way the universe is structured. He understands that a rational being must exist, who is responsible for the structure of the universe, and that rational being must be God. This category of law applies to all things in the universe ranging from rocks to human beings. All of these things have natural tendencies that…
As a theologian, Aquinas believes the supreme good derives from the eternal God, rather than a worldview good. The Natural Law theory is central to his work because it connects Aristotle’s argument and harmonizes it with the Church teachings. Unlike Aristotle, Aquinas believed the city was a mean to reach the ultimate end, which is God’s will. In his broad conception of explaining laws human beings should obey, the most virtuous ones are derived from God, not from man. He articulates the principle of obedience and how each person is obligated to perform their duties to society. This also is a slight critic from Aristotle’s teaching. Aquinas stressed the significance of duties, rather than performing deeds. Even though both words are relative to preserving and protecting the city, the teaching of obligations solidity the expectations of moral…
Aquinas tells us there are three different kinds of law; Eternal, Natural and Divine. The Eternal Law is God and God acting. The Natural Law is the law that is presented in the nature of things. For humans Natural Law is dictated by reason and is in relation to how we move towards the eternal law in developing our virtues. The Divine Law is the law that extends past Natural Law.…
A longstanding debate in human history is what to do with power and what is the best way to rule. Who should have power, how should one rule, and what its purpose should government serve have always been questions at the fore in civilization, and more than once have sparked controversy and conflict. The essential elements of rule have placed the human need for order and structure against the human desire for freedom, and compromising between the two has never been easy. It is a question that is still considered and argued to this day. However, the argument has not rested solely with military powers or politicians, but philosophers as well. Two prominent voices in this debate are Plato and Machiavelli, both of whom had very different ideas of government’s role in the lives of its people. For Plato, the essential service of government is to allow its citizens to live in their proper places and to do the things that they are best at. In short, Plato’s government reinforces the need for order while giving the illusion of freedom. On the other hand, Machiavelli proposes that government’s primary concern is to remain intact, thereby preserving stability for the people who live under it. The feature that both philosophers share is that they attempt to compromise between stability and freedom, and in the process admit that neither can be totally had.…
There were many factors throughout this period that helped shape and guide both Italian Politics and Society which helped eventually lead to unification, such as the rise of nationalistic and liberalistic sentiment which created a wave of enthusiastic, Italian patriots which helped shape the future of Politics and Society. Secondly, the significance of Piedmont cannot be overlooked as it both served as an example and later became the centre of Italian Politics and Society. However, it appears that Foreign Influence had the greatest impact on Politics and Society as it had a constant presence both positive and negative throughout the period, Duggan asserts that ‘Italy was unlikely ever to ‘make itself’1.…
St. Thomas Aquinas takes many of Aristotle 's ideas from The Politics in order to create his idea of the best regime. He revisits the good and bad forms of each type of government Aristotle introduced, and then makes his decision that the best regime is a type of monarchy that he calls kingship. This decision stems from his definition of a king as "one who rules over the people of a city or province for the common good" (17).…
Political factors played a huge role in the unification of Italy, both hindering and increasing the possibility of unification up to 1861. In this essay I will evaluate the most important factors that eventually led towards unification such as republicanism, Piedmont and Cavour, and wars such as the Crimean War. I will also discuss the factors that decreased the chances of unification including the congress of Vienna, the role of foreign powers such as Austria, and the role of the Papacy. By the end of this essay I will decide which political factor was the most important in terms of the unification. However, there are other factors heavily involved in the unification, such as the uprisings and revolutions, and the division between the revolutionaries.…
* While elaborating about different kinds of Governments, Aristotle says that there are three just and three unjust types on the basis of benefits to everyone or colleting it for the ruling class respectively. When the ruler king is good it is monarchy but it is called tyranny if the ruler is bad. When the elite ruler class performs better it is aristocracy but it becomes oligarchy if the ruling class support only those in power. Similarly when the masses rule good it is polity but it is democracy if they rule bad. He considers polity as best form which is least susceptible to corruption provided that the laws are given higher authority than the governing body. He also defends that all citizens are accountable and written laws have greater authority than the ruling class.…
Aquinas establishes early on that the state is a natural institution (very different from Augustine whose ideas prevailed up to this point in history) because "la naturaleza del hombre [es] ser un animal sociable y politico que vivien sociedad." (Aquinas, La Monarquia, I, p. 7) And he goes on to affirm that man must live in societies to achieve fulfillment "porque un sol hombre por si mismo no puede bastarse en existencia." (Aquinas, La Monarquia, I, p. 7). As a result, there has to be a group within state whose job it is to take thought for…
Merchants trading, Italian bankers sitting on 22222 benches, this was the birth of Contemporary economy. Commerce exploded during the renaissance, wealth was being held by a new level of people. Now that there was money in hands of this new “middle class” the people had new opportunities in life. More and more middle class people had availability to a variety of education and knowledge. Contrary from the middle ages, brawn does not beat knowledge anymore. The more knowledgeable people there were in Europe the more humanity could advance in a whole being individualistic, yet competition always arises in human nature. For the first time in history, this competition drove the creation of new ways of life. All the Italian city-states were competing to be the prettiest and most powerful state in Italy, because of this competition the best architecture, art, astronomy, and anatomy practices came up. Renaissance Europe introduced many new feats that we after 700 years still hold close to our hearts. Humankind right now still works on the technology and knowledge that was created during the renaissance, with out the knowledge that came out of the Renaissance the world would not be the same.…