Preview

It Immoral For A Person To Eat Their Dead (Lawnmower) Pet?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
298 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
It Immoral For A Person To Eat Their Dead (Lawnmower) Pet?
Question 1.Is it immoral(wrong) for a person to eat their dead (accidentally killed by a lawnmower )pet?

Conclusion: Sometimes, it is moral for a person to eat their dead pet killed by a lawnmower.

Premise: Some people who live in poor parts of countries can barely afford food and eating their dead pet doesn't affect their society in a negative way.

Justification: When people can't afford food for their families they will take drastic measures, such as eating their family pet if it was killed by. lawnmower. The family may not want to eat their pet, but if their dead pet is their last resort they will, to survive. The children may not be happy that their parents cooked their dead pet, but they now have some nutritional value, instead
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Monika's Doggie Rescue Case Study
    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Monika's Doggie Rescue Case Study

    The news called “NSW kills 150 dogs and cats everyday” had looked that 7600 pets were killed by council pound in 2010. Of the 50,000 abandon dogs in NSW pounds, over 1/3 of them were killed there .(Monika’s Doggie Rescue, 2011)…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analyzing Jeremy Rifkin's Article 'A Change Of Heart About Animals'
    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analyzing Jeremy Rifkin's Article 'A Change Of Heart About Animals'

    Jeremy Rifkin 's article, “A Change of Heart About Animals” argues that animals are more like humans than we imagine and as a result should be treated with the care that they deserve. Rifkin develops and supports his argument using facts about the animals and these facts end up touching hearts. In order for Rifkin to get his point across he uses a smart technique by using pathos and plays with the emotions of his audience. Rifkin loves animals and his passion and love evokes emotions that the audience can feel. Animals can feel and have emotions similar to ours. in agreement with Rifkin, I argue that it is wrong and inhumane to kill or abuse animals because they feel, they deserve to have space and should be valued as much as humans are It is wrong no animal should be killed due to abuse or testing, it is wrong and inhumane.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    16 Phil 100 Singer
    • 1806 Words
    • 10 Pages

    16 Phil 100 Singer

    Animals have no rational mind, and no soul; so we have no moral duty to…

    • 1806 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sustainabilitarianism And Eating Beef Case Study
    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sustainabilitarianism And Eating Beef Case Study

    Williston discusses that the demand for meat products have increased livestock industries and the way factory farms are conducted to farm their livestock. The argument opposing the idea of meat production inflicting unnecessary pain to the animals is sufficiently supported by animal welfarism. Despite sound reasons that are provided, it is not enough to prohibit people from consuming meat (49). Williston stated that, “animal welfarism [is] the view that individual non-human animals have intrinsic value and that this imposes on us…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Animal Slaughter
    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Animal Slaughter

    “On Apr. 10, 2001, the Washington Post re-ignited public debate about slaughterhouses with their exposé "They Die Piece by Piece.” The investigation found that animals in slaughterhouses were often cut apart "piece by piece" while still conscious” (Procon.org). There are two methods that usually being used to kill animals. Both methods are cruel and unethical to animals. The first method would be using carbon dioxide gas. The animals will be transferred into the conveyor belt that moves through the tunnel filled with carbon dioxide gas to kill the animals. The second method would be using electricity. The electric current is applied to the animals’ head for making them unconscious. Some animals are still alive during both methods and it would make them even more painful. This is just one aspect of cruelty for animals. Many opponents of vegetarianism say that animals are killed so the other organisms can live, and meats have been in our lives for 2.3 million years so there is nothing wrong with killing animal for foods. But being an animal has been already pitiful; we don’t need to create more suffering for…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Phil. outline
    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Phil. outline

    IV. Singer gives three ways which a utilitarian condemnation of the treatment of farm animals falls short when entitling we should switch to a vegetarian diet.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Azhenet Vidal Research
    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Azhenet Vidal Research

    Animal cruelty can either be deliberate abuse or simply the failure to take care of an animal. It really doesn’t matter what type of animal it may be it can be a farm animal, a pet, or even a wildlife animal. Any of these victims can suffer terribly. A person that has emotional problems may choose to beat, shoot, or stab the animal, or even set them on fire. When an animal is neglected they may not be given food, water, or shelter, and vet care. It our society it is very important to give the proper care to an animal if the animal isn’t well taken care of it will suffer consequences or even may die. Even though a lot of people don’t seem to make animal abuse it is still considered very severe, and there is U.S laws preventing animal abuse.’…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Meatless Like Me Analysis
    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Meatless Like Me Analysis

    I’m surprised to see some people moving to the status “vegetarian” and this worries me for some rationality. These vegetarians who were once traditional eaters have transformed their diet to green-eaters. For example, they have become sympathizes towards animals. Especially towards “cows”. In fact, Taylor Clark, the author of “Meatless Like Me” one day, “realized that he could never look a cow in the eyes” and he felt as if he was doing something “cruel and unnecessary” (345). On the other hand, there are many omnivores who simply care about sustaining a balanced diet such as myself. It is important to feed humans and then not kill a cow to obtain food to the dying human child is,…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Down On The Factory Farm Analysis
    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Down On The Factory Farm Analysis

    Peter Singer’s “Down on the Factory Farm” and E.B. White’s “Death of a Pig” illustrate practices of raising animals for human consumption. The care and environment provided for the animals by both White and the factory farmer’s that Singer discusses can be labelled as ‘animal husbandry’. White and the factory farm worker’s animal husbandry methods can be deemed as ethical, or unethical. Bernard E. Rollin defines good animal husbandry as “keeping the animals under conditions to which their natures [are] biologically adapted, and augmenting these natural abilities by providing additional food, protection, care, or shelter” (6). Through this definition of ethics and the criteria established by the “Principles” found in James P. Sterba’s “Reconciling Anthropocentric and Nonanthropocentric…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Annotated Bibliography On Eating Animals
    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Annotated Bibliography On Eating Animals

    The essay is presented on how different novelists represented eating animals in their own short essays. One story is a depiction on the ethics of importing animals for slaughtering by presenting the functional story of Professor David Lurie. Professor Lurie forced himself to eat sheep meat just to accept another person’s cultural belief. The common way of drawing a conceptual line between human and animal is represented repeatedly.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Do We Worry Too Much About the Welfare of Animals?
    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Do We Worry Too Much About the Welfare of Animals?

    The welfare of animals is a much spoken about topic, especially as the animals cannot talk about it themselves. It can be seen that our society worries too much about the welfare of animals but does not take enough action to protect these animals.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    EATING MEAT MORALLY PERMISSIBLE
    • 2590 Words
    • 11 Pages

    EATING MEAT MORALLY PERMISSIBLE

    Meat is said to contain some very essential nutrients that may not be found in plants and vegetable. This is however no moral justification of killing animals to obtain meat yet there are more reliable sources of proteins and vitamins. It appears that human nature is feeding on animals mainly for gustatory pleasure. As there are vegetables and fruits that can adequately supply human beings with the required food nutrients, there is no justification whatsoever for man to continue killing animals as this inflicts pain to animals (Matheny 510). Killing animals also deprives them of their right to life. Most animals are slaughtered at relatively lower ages ending their lives prematurely. The only way mankind would justify eating meat could be for survival.…

    • 2590 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animals, Vegetable, Miserable Analysis
    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animals, Vegetable, Miserable Analysis

    Animals, Vegetable, Miserable is an article written by Gary Steiner. It discusses the animals sufferings before they are served in a dining table. If is it wrong or inhumane to kill animals for consumption. However, the article authored by Natalie Angier states that apparently plants like other living organism are vulnerable and have emotional intelligence.Thus, the question arises, Should every individual eat meat or should not eat meat? The answer, eat meat but eat less of it. Keep everything balanced.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Euthanizations In The United States
    • 1861 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Animal Euthanizations In The United States

    There is an overwhelming amount of pet euthanizations in the United States each year. While these numbers are gradually declining, there is still a superfluous amount of animals who are put to death in order for animal shelters to save resources and space. The aid of having no-kill animal shelters in communities is a topic that has been debated for years. The absence of a no-kill animal shelters in Caldwell County is astounding, and quite frankly, a problem that has endured for too long. However, this decline in animal euthanization raises an additional question. What do we do with the overpopulation of animals? How do we thwart the euthanization of millions of animals without inducing a substantial increase in stray pets?…

    • 1861 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Against Meat Analysis
    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Against Meat Analysis

    We don’t hurt family members. We don’t hurt friends or strangers. We don’t even hurt upholstered furniture.”(Safran Foer, Against Meat). Safran Foer uses this example from his childhood to lead readers to the conclusion that by eating meat we are in fact harming animals. He makes the assumption that because people choose to eat meat that they are somehow choosing to harm animals. When in all reality the person eating the hamburger or chicken breast in fact did not have any sort of contact with the animal before the animal was cooked and prepared. I do agree with the author and his belief that harming animals is inhumane, but if we are given the choice to buy and consume meat that is organically raised we are in fact not harming the animals. According to the USDA organic regulations animals are allowed year-round access to the outdoor, raised on certified organic land meeting all organic crop production standards, and raised per animal health and welfare standards. The animals are fed 100 percent certified organic feed, except for trace minerals and vitamins used to meet the animal’s nutritional requirements, managed without antibiotics, added growth hormones, mammalian or avian byproducts, or other prohibited feed ingredients. Safran Foer does not successfully convince readers that being a…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics