Preview

It and Ethical Issues Questions

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2597 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
It and Ethical Issues Questions
Ethics and Social Issues
Final Exam Essay Questions

ESSAY QUESTIONS

1. Essay Question: Rule Vs. Act Utilitarianism (Utilitarianism) Suppose that you were wondering whether you, as a doctor, should hug a patient who is in tears. Give an ethical analysis of pros and cons from an act utilitarian point of view. Then give an analysis from a rule utilitarian point of view.

2. Essay Question: (Case Scenario -- Utilitarianism) Suppose that Rosa moves away her children out of town because, based on the information she has gathered, she believes the move will be the best for the children and larger family in the long run and she wants to do her duty by them. Imagine the two scenarios. Scenario 1: The results of the action are mostly positive for the family (and inspirational to their friends), because Rosa’s knowledge was good and nothing unexpectedly negative happens. Scenario 2: The results are greatly positive despite the fact that Rosa didn’t know very much, purely by luck. Scenario 3: The results are greatly positive mostly because Rosa worked hard to make the move a good one. Would Utilitarianism evaluate each act as having identical moral worth? Explain. Do you agree with the Utilitarian analysis?

3. Essay Question: (Case Scenario) Suppose that Rosa moves away her children out of town because, based on the information she has gathered, she believes the move will be the best for the children and larger family in the long run and she wants to do her duty by them. As it turns out, through no fault of her own, the children suffer greatly because of the move and the cost/benefit analysis after 2 ½ years shows that the pain outweighs the pleasure. Suppose that, 5 years later, a re-evaluation of the act in comparison to how alternative actions would have played out shows that her action, in fact, produced much more good than the other alternatives Do you think that we should (1) evaluate Rosa’s action as having been a good one, because it

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It Ethics Study Guide

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Semiconductor containing transistors, capacitors, and resistors. Invented at Fairchild Semiconductor and Texas Instruments. Smaller, faster, more reliable, and less expensive.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Xmgt 216 Appendix B

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Complete the chart below using information from the weekly readings and additional research if necessary. Include APA formatted in-text citations when applicable and list all references at the bottom of the page.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A utilitarian would approach an ethical dilemma by identifying the alternative actions and their harms and/or benefits for all stakeholders.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ford Pinto Case

    • 937 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I agree, as a utilitarian the only thing in my mind should be to evaluate the issue solely by utility in providing happiness, general welfare or pleasure as summed among all sentient beings. The basic ethical principle of this theory is of consequences, weighing them up to determine how every person involved in any event, issue, proposal, project and so forth, would be affected. The aim in doing so would be to decide on a morally right action, one that would result in the greatest overall positive consequences for everyone. So every aspect must be examined to evaluate potential good and bad outcomes; if the goods outweigh the bads, then morally, the action can be deemed right. If there are more bad consequences predicted, then the opposite applies.…

    • 937 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In terms of utilitarianism, actions are evaluated by the outcome. What we should do is to maximize the good outcomes and minimize the bad outcomes. The most promising way of reaching the final decision is to choose the one that would bring about the greatest net benefits to everyone affected by the action once the harms had been taken into account.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Ethics Quiz 2

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    an action can't be right if the people who are made happy by it are outnumbered by the people who are made unhappy by it.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitariansim is an ethical theory developed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mills that is founded on moral judgements or policies that focuses on bringing forth the greatest satistfaction or happiness for the greatest number of people. It can be described as quantitative and reductionst approach to ethics and contrasts with the deontology theory which do not regard the consequences of an act as a way to determine its moral value. Considering this dilemma, the Student nurse had to consider which act would bring forth the greatest good for the greatest number. One could argue, that the only person that mattered in this situation was the patient, since it was concerning her, however once may also argue that the decision she would make would have an impact on those around her and society around her in general. For instance, if she decides to amputate she wouldn’t come to hospital as often when it comes to her leg ulcers. This would result to empty beds meaning that someone who may need a bed for more dire reasons are more likely to have it. Furthermore, the costs taken from the NHS to treat her leg continually would decrease meaning that the chance of the government cutting down on other services would decrease. Also, she would not be in as much pain as she was in when she had the ulcerated leg. If she gets a prosthetic leg her mobility would improve and she may be able to mobilize better than she did previously. Although these outcomes may not appear obvious but the impact is undeniable. However, one may also argue that if she doesn’t amputate her family and friends may be happier with the decision (considering that all her family members share the same opinion with her daughter). She may be happier as well considering she has been living with her leg for a long time. The whole argument would result to determining whether her quality of life is better if she amputates or…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism favors a course of action that facilitates happiness. It can be considered as a form of consequential processes. According to this principle of classical ethical theory, utilitarianism refers to the moral value of an action though the determination of the resultant outcomes of the action. However, considerations should be placed on actual consequences, intended consequences and foreseen consequence. A classical study of this principle can be seen in the orders the military gives out or obeys (Arrigo, 2006). Utilitarianism principles have characteristics of reductionist and quantitative approaches to ethical issues, and it can be seen as a form of naturalism. Utilitarianism can be distinguished from deontological principles because deontology does not regard consequences as a determinant to moral value. Utilitarianism can also be distinguished from virtue ethics because virtue ethics emphasis on habits and acts that lead to happiness.…

    • 2731 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    • If the decision maker applied the utilitarian theory in this case, what would the result be, and why?…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    You Decide Memo

    • 502 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I have been informed of a heart that has become available. There are three patients awaiting a heart transplant. Each patient has their own unique situation, but in order to make an ethical decision that benefits the greater number of people, I must consider each person’s health history, life expectancy after the transplant, and the effect on their families. “If we make decisions on principles of utility or consequence, we would carefully consider everyone affected by the decision, and weigh the harms and benefits of every action.” (Levith)…

    • 502 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to an article in Forbes, Yang and the other participants in the software scam worked since 2009, obtaining and selling fraudulent product activation keys for Microsoft and other software programs through e-commerce websites. The participants traded product key codes over email and wired money to each other between different bank accounts. They allegedly operated a series of ecommerce sites, claiming to be selling the product activation keys legally, and received many “cease and desist” letters from Microsoft. It is thought the group may have made at least $30 million in profits over the years. That surge in profit from pirated software began to fall apart in 2013.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * A job situation in which an individual does not have an explicit or implicit contract for long-term employment. Examples are…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act utilitarianism has its advantages but fails in other areas. In assessing act utilitarianism, it satisfied the criteria of explanatory power and practicability but was weak in the area of completeness and moral…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics and Technology

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The biggest limitation of our existing system is its inherent inability to achieve its fundamental goal. Whatever happened to the dream of progress -- that modern technology would free people from drudgery, and everyone would be able to live in comfort, spending their time enriching the world and thinking great thoughts? Wasn't that what we really set out to achieve? Toward that goal, we can now make virtually any region of the earth comfortably habitable. We can produce food and clothing in staggering quantities, at unbelievable rates of production, using very little labor in proportion to the output. We have greatly extended the life span of our species, and we know how to cure or eliminate the suffering of a great range of diseases. We can communicate around the globe in less time than it takes to hear the voice of someone across a room. An interesting question to consider is this: if the technology necessary to live this way really could be developed, would it result in such a society? Starting from our present society, I would say "absolutely not." The technology that could easily feed the world would probably result in mass starvation. The competitive system can produce the tools we need to create a future of freedom and enlightenment, but unless the system evolves, it will work against our using those tools to the benefit of humanity. The system must evolve. We're not spreading the benefits of advancing technology, we're using it to exclude more and more people from the fruits of progress. Instead of laying off the…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays