Ismbar Framework Essay

According to the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care or ACSQHC, it has been estimated that up to 70% of errors and adverse events involve poor communication during handover (ACSQHC 2012, p. 7). In responding to that concern, our hospital has just started implementing a standardised tool for bedside handover in compliance to the policy directive, however this has created doubts on its effectiveness. In exploring different findings, it will provide a better evidence and understanding of the efficacy of bedside handover utilising ISBAR framework. The ACSQHC (2012) described the bedside handover as an interactive communication between nurses and patient through the gathering of relevant information in providing continuity
At the same time, it is applicable to a day-to-day practice and most often the authors will include the implication of the results from the study that can be use as evidence.
This study is best to use, because this can reliably identify whether the effectiveness of the bedside handover using ISBAR is better than the standard. Also, ACN 2016 described this type of study as the ‘golden standard’ or the best evidence to explore a study in connection to the viability of an intervention.
This study is good to use, because it can provide detailed information about the effectiveness of bedside handover and its influence in nursing care. Moreover, it can be use retrospectively to allow us to go backward in time and identify the effectiveness of the intervention before and at the present time with the available evidences.
This study is satisfying as an additional support, because this will be helpful in providing additional information or evidence from an expert opinion on the impact of bedside handover. According to ACN (2016) this type of study can be use as the basis to our practice if the research no available evidence; but a thorough evaluation is recommended if using this type of study to produce better