Preview

Is Torture Ethically Valid

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
80 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Torture Ethically Valid
Is torture ethically valid? We live in a world today, where we are surrounded by terrorism, bomb-threats, and chaos. So, we must ask ourselves, how far we would go, in the event, that a bomber was captured, to save millions of people. In the paragraphs below Utilitarianism and Deontology views will be compared to determine which view on torture would be best, in the efforts, to gather information on the location of bombs that could explode at any given
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary: Defusing The Ticking Bomb Scenarios
    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summary: Defusing The Ticking Bomb Scenarios

    Association for the Prevention of Torture. “Defusing the Ticking Bomb Scenario.” Current Issues and Enduring Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument, with Readings. Ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. New York: Bedford St. Martin’s, 2011. 836-851. Print.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cultural Evaluation of Torture
    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cultural Evaluation of Torture

    References: ROMERO, S. (2012). Leader’s Torture in the ’70s Stirs Ghosts in Brazil. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/05/world/americas/president-rousseffs-decades-old-torture-detailed.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compaire and Contrast of Torture
    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compaire and Contrast of Torture

    At some point everyone has heard of torture. It could have been in a movie or on the news, but they have heard of it. In this day and age, people would like to have believed it was all behind us in the past. Then 9/11 happened, everyone’s lives were changed with one simple act of cruelty. Before 9/11 hit the U.S. in a wave of pain, panic, and anger, our viewpoints on torture would probably have been less likely that it should be allowed. The decision to torture people who are suspected of being part of terrorist groups has always been decided by the government, for the simple reason that it is required to keep us safe from harm. Some people believe that torture is cruel, unsightly and just inhumane. On the other hand there are people who see it the same way but also believe it could be necessary in extreme circumstances. We’re going to look at two different points of torture: When it is acceptable and when it is not acceptable.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mill, Utilitarianism, and Waterboarding
    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mill, Utilitarianism, and Waterboarding

    Utilitarianism assumes that it would be morally correct for me to employ the water boarding technique on this possibly innocent man if it meant obtaining possible anti-terrorist information that could possibly save thousands of innocent Americans. The ‘greatest good for the greatest number’, so they say, but is torture really the best way to obtain the best consequence? I will use my take on the Just War model and J.J.C Smarts’ suggestion to focus on all consequences of a situation to argue against the notion that water torture would be morally ethical and the right thing that I ought to do.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Truth About Torture Analysis
    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Truth About Torture Analysis

    In “The Truth about Torture,” Charles Krauthammer critically analyzes the John McCain, an individual with tremendous moral influence who was tortured by the North Vietnamese, amendment. This amendment would prohibit all forms of torture from being executed on war prisoners of America. In response, Krauthammer states that in certain scenarios, torture is not “just permissible, but also morally required.” He divides the war prisoners into the following three classifications: ordinary soldiers arrested on the battlefield, captured terrorists, and finally, terrorists who possess information. With regards to the ordinary soldiers, McCain’s amendment is justified because although these war prisoners are on the opposite side of the conflict, they are nonetheless lawful fighters who committed no crime. On the contrary, Krauthammer believes that the terrorists are not worthy of the same protection and privileges since they intend to harm innocent citizens.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Influence Of Torture Interrogation
    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Influence Of Torture Interrogation

    Much help for Torture interrogation of psychological oppressors has risen in the general population gathering, to a great extent in view of the "ticking bomb" situation. I draw from the verifiable record, criminology, authoritative hypothesis, social brain research, and meetings with military experts to visualize an official program of Torture interrogation. The quintessential component of program configuration is a sound causal model relating contribution to yield. Since the September 2001 psychological militant assaults on the United States, much help for Torture interrogation of fear based oppressors has raised in general society discussion, to a great extent in view of the "ticking bomb" situation. National surveys…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Permissibility of Torture
    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moral Permissibility of Torture

    To most, torture is seen as action with a single definition that defines it, but in fact there are different types of torture that Henry Shue discusses in one of his articles. According to Shue there are rare conditions under which torture could be morally justified, but he does not endorse neither the interrogational torture not the terroristic torture. Although Shue agrees with illegality and morally wrongness of torture, he explains how one may go about defending torture and how it could possibly be morally justified.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tragedy In Torture
    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tragedy In Torture

    Advocates of torture argue that torture is a necessary tool especially in time sensitive scenarios, like if an individual is the only person alive who knows the whereabouts of a bomb that is set to detonate, resulting in the deaths of hundreds. I could not even imagine how stressful the interview process of this scenario would be, as time progresses and no results are being produced, inflicting pain does not only have the possibility of yielding results but it would also be a convenient way to externalize your frustrations.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay: Should We Use Torture?
    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Persuasive Essay: Should We Use Torture?

    When it comes to the topic of torture, most of us will readily agree that torturing someone in order to get information is not the answer. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of how guilty a person is, and what should be done in the case of a bombing. On the one hand, people argue that torture is unconstitutional and should not be practiced because it questions a person’s morality and what they are willing to do in order to get results. On the other hand, however, others argue that we should allow torture because it is more just than allowing thousands of innocents to die because we didn’t want to question a single person. I have mixed feelings on the topic. While I recognize that our actions may be for the greater good, we cannot allow ourselves to lose our morality because of it. I do not believe that a person should be tortured for information unless it is under specific circumstances. What I mean by this is that people should not torture someone unless that person is obviously guilty or it is…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Is The Use Of Torture Justified?
    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Is The Use Of Torture Justified?

    There are many questions relating to the use of torture against any person whatsoever. As such, there are different perspectives on the ethics of its usage as well. While some believe that the use of torture becomes necessary at times, others believe that whatever the circumstances are, torture can never be justified. Some very pertinent issues related to the use of torture are, “Suppose a child has been kidnapped and a person has been suspected of committing the crime. Is it justifiable to torture that person in order to try to extract information from him about the child? Now suppose the person would not react at all if he is subjected to torture but there is a chance that he would divulge information if his child of the similar age as the…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is Torture Ok?
    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Is Torture Ok?

    There is an ongoing debate on whether torture should be used and if it is ever “ok”. There are many different points of view and both sides have very clear, convincing arguments on whether torture should be used as a way to obtain information. One side says that torture is not necessary even in extreme cases. The other side it should be used if it mandatory. Although these sound like a compromise they do have a few conflicting ideas. Even though both essays are trying to sway the reader to one side or another, it is the reader’s choice on how he or she feels on torture.…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Torture
    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against Torture

    Justifying the needs of implementing various methods of torture is strongly a recommended option to protecting America’s security and American citizens. While the debate of whether the use of torture is valid to protect the United States of America overall, supporters of the argument strongly argue that interrogating terrorists is only useful when various torture methods are involved. During one of the United States of America’s darkest periods in the nation’s history, the terrorists attack of September 11, 2001 rebooted the discussion of how various methods of torture are a justifiable means to not only place vengeance on the terrorists involved in the attacks on America’s soil. In the course of the aftermath of the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001, supporters of using various methods of torture during the interrogation process observed a central argument to prove their case. For example, if America’s security becomes unfortunately at risk of another terrorists attack, the nation could potentially protect Americans by implementing various methods of torture to only not question terrorists’ against their willpower.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Torture Is Wrong
    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Torture Is Wrong

    Torture has been a technique use by many nations in the world including the United States. Physically and psychologically damage captured people is what the government do when under attack. There were innocent victims along with attackers that got captured for terrorist and war interrogation. Terrorist attacks like September 11 are unpredictable and it then disturb every citizen’s everyday life. However, that should not be the reason to arrest suspects and torture them, sometimes to death, to get ahold of the true culprits.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Torture: Morality and Terrorist
    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Torture: Morality and Terrorist

    In the article “The Truth about Torture”, Charles Krauthammer considers the ticking time bomb problem and argues that torture is sometimes not only morally permissible, but morally necessary. Krauthammer uses the example of terrorists in his example, what if we captured a terrorist with knowledge of an attack and the knowledge of future attacks; do we torture him for his information? Or simply just have him locked up? (Krauthammer 2). Utilitarian considerations are sufficient to justify using cruel actions against terrorists to extract confessions. Even though is cruel to torture one to extract information, it is our duty as citizens to maintain the happiness as a whole and do what is necessary to save lives.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Affirmative Argument for Torture
    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Affirmative Argument for Torture

    Then there is the reoccurring scenario of the ticking-bomb: A man is captured who has hidden a bomb that will kill a number of innocent people. Would torture be justified in…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics