Preview

Is The Constitution A Success Or A Failure

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
711 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is The Constitution A Success Or A Failure
In order for the United States to become a successful nation after the revolutionary war the Congress had to devise a system of government that would be just and effective. First, the articles of confederation were drawn up, but they failed massively. The major reason for failure was the excessive amount of power the states had over the federal government, creating a weak central government, and obviously, the states couldn’t function as a stable group. Unlike our current government, the articles relied on solely the congress with the executive and judicial offices nonexistent. With no executive office to enforce the laws, and no judicial wing to interpret them, most of the laws congress passed were ignored, or modified by the individual states, …show more content…

Originally, they were published in The Independent Journal and The New York Packet. The general reason of these papers were to support the Constitution, even though in the first part of said papers, that they only wanted a good, strong, lasting government. Some historians, such as Richard B. Morris, have gone as far as to refer to the Federalist Papers as an “Incomparable exposition of the Constitution”. When they were first published, fearing political backlash, the authors remained anonymous for a time, but the more perceptive citizens will able to determine the author’s identities. Even now, there is some debate over who was the main, or most influential author, but the majority consensus is that Madison is “The Father of the Constitution” whilst others say Thomas Jefferson is. Most of the papers are basically a switched around and edited version of the U.S. Constitution, the papers mentioning amendments and the Bill of Rights. As with most political papers and opinions, there’s always an opposing side, many of the Anti-Federalists drafting their own rebuttal to the Federalist Papers. Oddly enough, the papers opposed the Bill of Rights. Federal judges often use the papers as a look into the intentions of the framers and …show more content…

For example, both the congress and the president have the power to veto each other’s laws, but only in certain situations, and the Supreme Court interprets the laws that are not vetoed and are actually passed. The president also needs congressional approval to declare a full scale war on another country. The president can do a few military action without congressional approval, and can even assume full control of the nation in a massive crisis situation, such as an invasion or nuclear attack. On the congressional side, their direct control maneuver is the ability to impeach (fire) the president, they may be able to even charge the president for treason after the impeachment based on his/her crime. The Judicial Branch doesn’t really have a “power card” such as executive order or impeachment, the closest thing they have is the ability to declare a bill unconstitutional. Even with its flaws, our constitution has stood the test of time, lasting about 240 years, and it has been implemented in countries all over the world! Hopefully, one day, every man, woman, and child on the planet earth are under a democracy, and have their freedom from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Federalist Papers, written collaboratively by Madison, Hamilton, and Jay, were intended to support Federalism. Federalist Papers 10 and 51, specifically, endorse the idea of a large, layered, republic government. Federalist Paper 10 was written by Madison and focuses on factions and how a republic government would be more effective than a state-run government. Federalist Paper 51, weather written by Madison or Hamilton, puts emphasis on defending the Constitution and discusses separated powers and checks and balances. Both Federalist Paper 10 and 51, along with the rest, are in support and defense of the Constitution.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Articles of Confederation provided a working government for the United States, it was not necessarily an effectively working government; an effective government would be one that not only establishes control and authority, but one under which the nation flourishes. Certainly the Articles set down a basic government with the idea of a democratic republic. However, the Articles of Confederation didn't impose an effective government as much as it set the basis for one. It was unable to enforce many laws and many of those set were also unequal in operation, as unfair to some states as fair to others. Thus, from 1781 to 1789, the Articles of Confederation established a working, yet ineffective government, with very little control or authority over foreign relations, the economy, and western lands.…

    • 927 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation of 1781 produced the first endeavor of government structure. This attempt of forming a national and state government failed. Some of the issues that transpired from the constitution include: Each state only had one vote in Congress, regardless of state size; Congress did not have the powers to tax or regulate foreign or interstate commerce; There was not a recognized national court system or executive branch to enforce acts passed by Congress; While amendments to the Constitution required a unanimous vote, the passing of a law required a 9/13 vote. The lack of involvement of the national government allowed states to become self-governing and sovereign. States printed their own money that only had value within that territory which created a hindrance in trade and in turn produced an unstable economy. The national government having no enforcing authority and the United States of America was in a state of chaos. This generated an out lash from individuals.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist No. 10 The Federalist Papers where some of the most important essays ever written in the united states, in terms of political papers, because they were used to convince the states to ratify the new constitution. The Federalist Papers No.10 was written by James Madison and is entitled “The Union is a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection” The main purpose of the essay was to illustrate why factions were dangerous to the new government of the United States. Factions are what Madison defines as “groups” of people who have the same interests.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On February 6th, 1788 in the state of New York, James Madison, wrote the famous Federalist Paper, “Federalist No. 51”. The Federalist Papers were a set of 85 documents, promoting the ratification of the constitution led by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. Specifically, this documents purpose was for Madison to inform the ideals of the separation of powers and it’s ability to sustain liberty. In order for this to happen, the three branches must be separate from each other and independently run their own department of government. Madison stressed this ideal throughout the first portion of the document because he believed that it should be an equal power balance between the three. No member of a branch should rule over another…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalist No 10 was an essay written by James Madison and published through many news papers along with many others for the decision to have the United States Constitution ratified. Madison believed that the constitution formed a government that was in enough power to do away with the chaos caused by groups of people known as factions. In Madison's terms factions were people who gathered together to protect and promote their special economic interest and political opinions.…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1781 and 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an ineffective government, Although there were flaws, strong steps were taken in the attempt to try and make the United States a better country. The Articles set up a government that gave individual states the power to make their own laws and enforce them. This was ineffective for the following reasons: 1) The Continental Congress controlled public affairs but there was nothing in the Articles that gave Congress the power to enforce laws or unify the states. 2) There was no solid system of money to ensure that taxes would be paid or protect commerce, both nationally and with foreign trade. 3) The country lacked unity and strength because there was no leadership.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As inevitable as the U.S. Constitution feels today as the foundation on which the United States of America and its political system are built, it was not the first document ratified by the former British colonies to establish a union. During the years of the American Revolutionary War and the years directly following it, the newly formed United States of America were essentially a collection of thirteen more or less sovereign states loosely held together in an alliance by the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union (Articles of Confederation). However, as a foundation for a functioning government, the Articles of Confederation were lacking, leaving the federal government essential powerless and unable to effectively execute the few powers explicitly bestowed upon it by the Articles. Fiscal issues and rebellion threaten to tear the young nation…

    • 2487 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was not an effective government, but rather, a workable one. We must understand that whenever a government is set up so loosely with no able guidelines, problems are bound to occur. The Articles of Confederation was more a “club” than a government. Anyone could leave whenever they so desired. Unfortunately the government did not work, but ironically, the leaders of our country purposely formulated this weak government out of fear of the past. This was an unavoidable…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush 1985 Dbq

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “From 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government.” This statement is quite bold considering that the Articles lasted only eight years. In some ways this form of government was effective and in some ways it was not. It did provide the newly formed American colonies with the means to govern themselves in the manner that they wished to be governed and set the rules for operations of the United States government. On the other hand, it was ineffective because there was no president or executive agencies or judiciary, nor was there a tax base or even a way to pay off state and national debts from war years. They could also be called ineffective because of their limited scope and the inability of Congress to enforce any of the decisions that it made.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American system of government following the end of the American Revolution was a disaster as far as the nation’s status as a union. Under the Articles of Confederation, there was nothing “unified” about the United States. The states stood in the union as individual bodies, with little to no ties to a seemingly non-existent central governing body or to the other states. This allowed the states to disregard other states’ laws and ultimately created disunion within the states. Because it has been proven that the states cannot stand alone and sufficiently govern themselves without a strong central government, the national government should be the supreme law of the land.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A handful of men on each side of the debate became the central figures in an extensive public discussion about the proposed Constitution, publishing a series of widely-published and carefully read articles explaining their positions. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, writing under the pseudonym Publius, wrote dozens of articles supporting the Constitution which are now collectively referred to as The Federalist Papers. Articles written in response by George Mason, Elbridge Gerry and Patrick Henry are, appropriately, known as the Antifederalist Papers. While these writings are the best known and most widely read today, there were hundreds, even thousands of others who joined in the debates through public argument or speech-making and by writing articles, letters and pamphlets.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Democratic Gazette Sabeena Jagdeo The Constitution: Key to Our Success Last night, President Johnson gave his Third Annual Message speech, ensuring the American citizens that the Constitution will remain a part of the United States, and by doing so, it will help further the country's success. The fact of the matter is that, the Constitution serves as the basic law and regulation system for the United States. Without it, we have nothing to base our laws and values on, as Johnson continually stated in his message. To dissolve the Constitution, is to destroy our nation, it will only cause more conflict among the states rather than repairing the injuries between the northern and southern states which were caused by the war.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people who supported the new Constitution, the Federalists, began to publish articles supporting ratification. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay eventually compiled 85 essays as The Federalist Papers. These supporters of the Constitution believed that the checks and balances system would allow a strong central government to preserve states' rights. They felt that the Articles of Confederation was too weak and that they were in need for a change (http://www.congressforkids.net/Constitution_ratifyingconstitution.htm). President George Washington wrote a letter to John Jay on August 1, 1786. In this letter Washington agrees with Jay’s criticism of the Articles of Confederation and says “we have errors to correct. We have probably had to good an opinion of human nature in forming our confederation…” The Articles of Confederation had “errors” that needed to be corrected. He complained that the thirteen “disunited states” could never agree. He also suggest that human nature being what it was, America needed a stronger, less democratic national government (doc.3).…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays