Top-Rated Free Essay

Is Non Violence an Effective Form of Protest? Why or Why Not?

Good Essays
Is non violence an effective form of protest? Why or why not?
Non-violence is a very effective form of protest because people can get the rights and authority that they fight for from the hostile class, government or country without sanguinary wars. Non-violence is a philosophy and strategy for social change that rejects the use of violence. In history, there are several successful revolutions that show this form of revolt is absolutely efficacious. First of all, non-violent protest is effective because it either allows the protesters greater control of their message, and even if meet with violent suppress from government, it still lowers the authority of the state. For example, in Indian Non Cooperation Movement led by Gandhi in 1920’s, it included surrender of titles, resignation from nominated seats in local government bodies, boycott of government educational institutions, law courts and foreign goods. In addition, from March 1930 to April 1934, Gandhi also called the Indian people to process the Civil Disobedience Movement, which was known as Salt Satyagraha. Through these decades-long nonviolent struggles, India won its independence in from the British Empire.
On the other hand, non-violent protesters usually focus on the media to state their call, which means acting in self-defense, but some times they lose control of non-violence fight theme. In such situations the government can claim to be protecting law and order. Then the state can easily use the threat of violent demonstration as a tool against the protesters. Like among the Non Cooperation Movement, over 2000 Indian arrested because they lost their control and burned police office with 22 policemen. More over, even if Salt Law was broken in 1931 through Salt Satyagraha, Gandhi was arrested along his followers.
And also, non-violent protest puts the protester on a higher moral level and may give the society to overlook the underlying causes of unrest and merely wish for law and order. No matter how just the cause, a society generally prefers slow harmonious change over bloody violence in the streets. Unlike an ordinary law breaker, the non-violent protester is also at the same time showing his commitment to the overall harmony of the society. But this strongly requires that any authority reveal its own dedication to harmony by showing a certain respect or in fact as moral as protesters. Non-violent protest is effective at not only having the message heard but actually listened to by the greater society. If met with violence, it shows a society that the society has much deeper problems than the cause of a particular protest.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Non Peaceful Protests

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Parks after her incident on the bus. Peaceful resistance is an important factor in our free society today in American culture. The problem today is that many protest are no peaceful and often turn violent. There are many examples of how protests impact society, but I think one of the most prevalent was Rosa Parks and her simple yet effective protest of not giving up her seat on the bus. By doing what she did she sent a message through the entire country of how a simple action can do so much because this…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Non-violence is more effective than violence because it helps resolve arguments in a peaceful, not harmful way without causing any damage. Non-violence means the use of peaceful means, not force, to bring about political or social change. People will have to wait for a change, but it will be a better and greater change. To begin with, non-violence is the most effective method for change because it’s safer. Violence is putting people's lives in danger. Safety is “safer” for everyone. Non-violence…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Non-Violence

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Reason for Violence Imagine: Your school principal informs the student body that starting the next day, your lunch time will be cut from the usual 40 minutes to 30. You are upset about his decision. What do you do, respectfully confront your principal, or blow up the school? Sure, blowing up the school will bring attention to your protest, but is that the right thing to do? Violent protests are one example of capturing attention, but at the end of the day, non-violent means of protest are the…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    where violent resistance is no longer a realistic option to oppose an oppressive regime? The Kenny reading showed that non-violence is a path that can lead to regime change. Why is that? Is it because a non-violent struggle is morally superior to a violent one, and is therefore difficult to oppose? After all, it’s difficult to justify violence against those who struggle without violence, for human rights, justice and democracy, things most people desire. To repress them would be a blatant violation of…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Non Violence

    • 1870 Words
    • 6 Pages

    response. This problem is complicated by the fact that both sides are usually able to argue that the other side started the violence. Gandhi started this nonviolent approach in India, Martin Luther King learned from Gandhi’s tactics and used them in the 1950’s, and in 1989 the students in Tiananmen Square used the same approach. All of these people had success to some extent. Non-violent resistance strategies, such as those pioneered by Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King are designed to avoid…

    • 1870 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why a non-violent means of protest can be the best and most effective way of gaining freedom from repression Can violence as a form of protest ever be justified? In this essay, one will be able to determine why a non-violent means of protest can be the most effective way of gaining freedom from repression. In contrast to this, the essay will also discuss whether violence as a…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Arguing Is Effective

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Whoa, wait! Arguing is effective? Life's choices tend to be complicated sometimes. Everyone is entitled to their own personal opinions; however, they do not always share a common perspective. As a result, arguing has become a common act to resolving problems over the years, and no one knows arguing better than today's younger generations. The problem with most people is that they refuse to acknowledge when arguing is appropriate and in which situations it is most effective. That is how people find…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henceforth the photos are very effective for the readers in many ways. These photos make me feel sympathy for the people there were involved in the Holocaust because they were judged on because of their race and forced through pain and death for no reason. Most people that were killed were innocent and did nothing but they had to go to the concentration camps that were shown in the photos on the website. To me this is heartbreaking, and I honestly do not know why anyone would hate someone…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Non-Violence

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Non-violence Strategies in Israel/Palestine As the world is familiar with the on-going conflict between Israel and Palestine, and we are aware that the uproar between these two nations had been in the most extreme form. Judaism and Islam are two of the world's oldest and largest monotheistic religions. These religions share a variety of customs, beliefs, and practices. At the same time, there are enough differences that make these two clash. Although there are many conflicts going on in this…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King promoted non-violent means to achieve civil-rights reform and was awarded the 1964 Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts. King's grandfather was a Baptist preacher. His father was pastor of Atlanta's Ebenezer Baptist Church. King earned his own Bachelor of Divinity degree from Crozier Theological Seminary in 1951 and earned his Doctor of Philosophy from Boston University in 1955. While at seminary King became acquainted with Mohandas Gandhi's philosophy of nonviolent social protest. On a trip…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays