Preview

Is Murder Justifiable

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
875 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Murder Justifiable
Is murder ever justifiable?

“An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind”. This universal phrase, used by Ghandi many years ago, is still used to reinforce the fact that if one murders another they don’t deserve to be killed. If people thought like this the human race would come to extinction. Many believe that if someone was to kill your loved one, you would have the right to kill in retaliation. If someone kills (who do they kill) do they deserve to be killed? The answer is no, because regardless why they killed there is no reason in continuing the chain of senseless slaughter. I can’t feel how many would have felt in a situation where there might be a strong reason to murder, but not many would want to have the burden of guilt for taking the life of anyone - even one who deserves it. This in of itself is damning, but with the justice system as well, which is harsh even on those who have committed “petite” crimes like robbing from a convenience store. Imagine the punishment for a crime as extreme as murder. From this we see that, even in the most extreme of cases, murder is not justifiable in any way.

There is no logical reason for taking the life of another in no way is it justifiable, with the added bonus of justice there is also the internal feeling of knowing you have committed an unanswerable crime of violence and you walk freely. Have you ever done something you know are not right and have the guilt eat away at you until you have to come clean (shorten this question)? Imagine that same feeling ten times worst because you took the life of another one who might not have believed in heaven or hell and this was their only chance to live for anything .This all because you have a believe that they had wronged you( not needed). The guilt alone is as painful as justice because it can send people mad with this feeling and some even go as extreme as suicide (redundant). Guilt can also send you in the direction of hurting or even killing your loved ones the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    “An eye for an eye, makes the whole world blind” -Ghandi. Every human has an innate desire to seek vengeance when they or their loved ones are victimized. Justice can be achieved, however, without resorting to vengeance and cruelty.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It will never be acceptable to kill innocent people, yet it happens all too often. In the American television series Dexter, the main character of the same name lives to satisfy his father 's "code" by killing terrible criminals who deserve death for continuing to get away with murder. Dexter executes the guilty with precision and with assurance that they deserve it. Throughout the episodes, this piece of literature argues that only those truly guilty of malicious crimes towards society deserve a just death (Dexter). Our country claims that capital punishment is justifiable because they claim to only kill those truly guilty of crimes. Nothing is more extreme than taking a life, so it is important…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Phil 1112 Death Penalty

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The dictionary defines the death penalty as punishment for someone convicted of a capital crime. Dating back to centuries ago, any capital crime such as murder, rape, drug trafficking were not tolerated by any means and were immediately sentenced to death. “An eye for an eye” was the typical argument that defended the side that the punishment should equal the crime. In an article written by Louis Pojman, he defends the death penalty with his own “eye for an eye” theory. His reasoning is that he believes humans are logical creatures who make the logical choice to commit a muder, therefore giving up their right to live. Pojman argues that the death penalty is a good deterrent for potential…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    pre ap reasearch paper

    • 1120 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In our country’s justice system the death penalty is good for many things, such as, serving as a deterrent for violent crimes all over the nation. We as humans have the ability to decide for ourselves whether an idea is good or bad. Often times to do this we look at the actions of others to earthier strengthen our confidence in our idea or to deter the idea that we have. This is the same concept that the death penalty brings to our society. the death penalty according to Richard Worsnop a writer for the CQ Researcher, “…is traditionally justifiyed in society for two reasons, retribution and detturance(Williams). The Latter of the two in retrospect is the most important. In our justice system the main crimes that are punishable by the death penalty are felony murder or murder in the first degree(Mitchell). Felony murder is defined as, “a killing treated as a murder because, though…

    • 1120 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we examine some arguments presented from both sides, opponents of the capital punishment claim that executing someone is nothing more than an immoral, state-authorized killing which undervalues the human life and destroys our respect for our government which itself says that killing is wrong. But the supporters of the death penalty think that certain murderers do deserve nothing less than a death for themselves and that although everyone is born with the right to live, criminals lose these rights at the moment when they take away the rights of another human and only by punishing them in such way, the society is affirming the value which is placed on the victim’s right to live.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    They argue that vengeance or an eye for an eye pays respect to the victim, but also it helps to comfort the grieving families (Pojman, 2006). The advocates argue that it guarantees that the criminal of the terrible crimes never will have another chance to cause potential heartbreak.…

    • 2428 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    With consideration to absolute moral prohibition, it would be wrong to murder any number of innocent persons, despite any beneficial consequences. The benefits of murdering one would not outweigh the means of the action.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment is viewed as a political viewpoint that has pro’s and con’s by the American people. Capital punishment is known as the “The Death Penalty” and is identified as the premeditated and planned taking of a human life. The government views this as a response to a crime committed by a legally convicted person. The question is The Death Penalty just and applied fairly? The argument against Capital punishment can include the following; Amnesty International, who believes that “The Death Penalty” is the cruelest denial of human, rights (White, 2009). The pro’s state that, “Capital punishment gives society the right and duty to protect the innocent in self-defense.” The Death Penalty gives closure to the victim’s families who have suffered so much. Some families may never recover from the cruelty of the crime, and most families just want closure. Most Americans and people from different countries such as; china, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan agree with capital punishment. White stated, “I believe that it sends the wrong message: Killing people who kill people to show killing is wrong (White, 2009). Therefore, is it just and applied fairly is the question that is asked, should we kill because some kill? I believe that we are sending a message to promote killing, is it fair for some and not for others.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a saying around the world that goes, “An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth,” so if I killed your brother, it means I deserved the same punishment, right? The topic of death penalty has been on the floor to be debated as a controversial issue in the United States for years. Many tend to believe that as soon as you lay your hands on another person and hurt them to the point of death, you already lost your moral and values to life, so what’s point of giving you a second chance? Although that might be partially true, we as human beings have no rights to decide the life and death of another being.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    is killing ever justified

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    No I don’t think killing for any reason is ever justified be it as revenge against someone or just because you want to hurt another person.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to decide if killing is ever a justifiable act, you must be in a position where it would actually make sense to. For example, imagine your mom or dad is in the hospital and has been on life support for a few months now. The doctor says they may never wake up again, so what do you do? Do you pull the plug and release the pain forever or keep them on longer to see if they will wake up? Say it’s been a year now, would you change your mind if you picked the second answer? With that said, in certain situations, killing another is a justifiable act for moral reasons, such as Euthanasia, Capital Punishment, and in the case of George and Lennie.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    0004. “Individuals who engage in inhumane activities should face the death penalty thereby saving the taxpayer the cost of supporting their life of imprisonment.” `AN EYE FOR AN EYE WILL MAKE THE WHOLE WORLD BLIND; the famous quote spoken Mahatma Gandhi- the quote used countless timesby appeasers of the death penalty: The same death penalty that has not been used in Australia since 1967- which was then abolished by the federal government in 1973. Death penalty appeasers will argue that “The death penalty violates the right to life. It is cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment.”* This may be true, but aren’t the crimes of rape and murder even more so? Wouldn’t one feel justice had been served if your child was brutally murdered, or would…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    should be moral because, " a life for a life." Is the death penalty immoral?…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The death penalty will always be a topic some people refuse to talk about. When in fact, it is a very serious topic and people should know how and why the death penalty is not justified. I believe the death penalty is not justified in the least bit because there are people sitting up in prison just living life because the state does not want to pay for an execution, or they find it to be morally corrupt. Personally if you committed a crime that resulted in someone dying then you deserves to die as well. The idea of killing another human does not sit well with people and that is mainly the reason why they are against the death penalty, when they should be for the death penalty because it will cost the state less and a person who took a life will no longer be walking the earth.…

    • 1824 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some of the basic arguments for and against the taking of human life in certain instances are suicide and war. Most religious arguments in taking of human life believe it is Gods responsibly not our place in deciding when a life should be taken.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays