The Aga Khan University
Professional Development Centre, Chitral
Institute for Educational Development
Is it the way to teach language the way we teach
language? English language teaching in rural
Aga Khan University, Professional Development Centre, Chitral
Follow this and additional works at: http://ecommons.aku.edu/pakistan_ied_pdcc Recommended Citation
Nawab, A. (2012). Is it the way to teach language the way we teach language? English language teaching in rural Pakistan. Academic Research International, 2(2), 696-705.
Available at: http://ecommons.aku.edu/pakistan_ied_pdcc/9
ISSN-L: 2223-9553, ISSN: 2223-9944
Academic Research International
Vol. 2, No. 2, March 2012
IS IT THE WAY TO TEACH LANGUAGE THE WAY WE TEACH LANGUAGE?
ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN RURAL PAKISTAN
Aga Khan University,
Institute for Educational Development,
Professional Development Centre Chitral,
With the growing importance and need of English language in the global context, efforts are being made in the developing context to improve the quality of teaching English with the assumption that teaching of English facilitates the acquisition of English Language. What is Pakistani teachers approach to the teaching of English language and does the way they teach English facilitate the language acquisition? The current study explores this question at secondary level in the context of Chitral, a remote district of Khyber Pukhtunkhwa province Pakistan. The researcher visited the randomly selected secondary schools and consulted English teachers interviewing them and observing the teaching and learning processes. The study reveals that in the context of Chitral, teaching of English is not different from teaching of other subjects such as social studies, history etc. Translation method is the dominant way to teach English and learners hardly get any opportunity to practice language skills in the classrooms. The reasons behind this approach to the teaching of English are; lack of purposefully trained teachers, non-availability of in-service courses for secondary level English teachers, memory driven exam system, overcrowded classrooms, teachers’ work load, shortage of resources and lack of ongoing support system. The study suggests that English teachers should be trained separately focusing teaching English as a language unlike other subjects.
Keywords: Language Skills, Rural Pakistan, Secondary Level, Teaching of English
The growing need and importance of English language at the present day has made the acquisition of this language as an important requirement for today’s student. As English is perceived as an indispensable tool in order to survive in the global economy, the demands for English language have grown (Paik, 2008). Despite the importance and need of English language, it has generally been observed in the developing context especially in context of Pakistan that students having strong language competencies easily get entry into higher institutions while such entry is denied to those who have poor background in English language. The importance of English language is even more intense at secondary level as this transitional stage prepares learners either to be an earning member for the family through joining various trades or enter higher institutions with sound background. As Jimenez and Rose (2010) believe, “Without a sustained and systematic effort, students in the process of learning English have almost no hope of acquiring the kinds and amounts of cultural, social, and academic capital that they need to moveinto higher education ormeaningful work” (p.411). As a result, English language has been a means of either success or failure. Support for this interpretation comes from Zeegers(2005) who argues that it is the language which facilitates all other learning and all learning failure is...
References: Aslam, H. D. et al. (2010). Comparison of Human Resources’ Impact on TeachingGrammar to Second
Language Learners and DevelopingTeachers’ attitude towards Teaching of English Grammarat
Baker, J. &Westrup, H. (2000).The English Language Teacher’s Handbook: Continuum.
Barton, A. (2006). Getting the buggers into languages. London: Continuum.
Beck, S. W. (2009). Composition across secondary and post-secondary contexts: cognitive, textual and
Behlol, M. G.& Anwar, M. (2011). Comparative Analyses of the Teaching Methods and Evaluation
Practices in English Subject at Secondary School Certificate (SSC) and General Certificate of
Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1999).Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Czerniewska, P. (1998). Learning to read and write in English. In N. Mercer & J. Swann (Eds.),
Learning English development and diversity (pp.76-113), New York: Routledge.
Demirezen, M. (2011).The Foundations of the Communicative Approach and Three of Its
Applications.Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 7(1), 57-71.
Dobinson, T. (2001). Do learners learn from classroom interaction and does the teacher have a role to
play? Language Teaching Research, 5(3), 189-211.
Dubin, F. (1977).Facilitating Language Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Emmitt, M. et al.(2003).Language and learning: An introduction for teaching (3rd ed). Oxford
University Press: New York.
Hird, B. et al. (2000). Teaching English as a second language to children and adults: variations in
practices.Language Teaching Research, 4(1) 3–32
James, P. (2001). Teachers in action: tasks for in-service language teacher education and
Jimenez, R. T. & Rose, B. C. (2010).Knowing how to know: building meaningful relationships
through instruction that meets the needs of students learning English.Journal of Teacher Education,
Kropp, P. (1993).The Reading Solution. New York: Random House.
Littlewood, W. (2001).Students attitude to classroom English learning: A cross-cultural study.
Lucas, T. et al. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education: preparing classroom teacher to
teach English language learners
Mercer, N. (1998).English as a classroom language. In N. Mercer & J. Swann (Eds.), Learning English
development and diversity, (pp.119-147), New York: Routledge.
Mistry, M. &Sood, K. (2010). English as an additional language: assumptions and challenges.
Nikolov, M. (1999). Why do you learn English? Because the teacher is short.A study of Hungarian
children’s foreign language learning motivation, Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 33-56.
Paik, J. (2008). “Learning English, imagining global”: The narratives of early English education
experiences in South Korea
Patil, Z. N. (2008). Rethinking the objectives of teaching English in Asia. Asian EFL Journal, 10(4),
Sahu, B. K. (2004). Principals of teaching English.Kalyani Publishers: New Delhi.
Shahid, S.M (2002).Teaching of English. Lahore: Majeed Book Depot.
Shamim, F. (2008). Trends, issues and challenges in English language education in Pakistan. Asia
Pacific Journal of Education, 28(3), 235-249.
Siddiqui, S. (2010).Rethinking education in Pakistan: Perceptions, practices and possibilities.
Stern, H.H. (1983).Fundamental concepts of language teaching. London: Oxford University Press.
Tüzela, A. E. B. &Adcanb, S. (2009). Raising the language awareness of pre-service English teachers
in an EFL context.European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 271–287.
Watkins, P. (2007). Learning to teach English: A practical introduction for new teachers. New Delhi:
Viva Books Private Limited.
Wyse, D.& Jones, R. (2001).Teaching English Language and Literacy.London: Taylor &Francis
Xie, X. (2009). Why are students quiet? Looking at the Chinese context and beyond, ELT Journal,
Zeegers, M. (2005). English community school teacher education and English as a second language in
Papua New Guinea: a study of a practicum.Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2), 135–
Please join StudyMode to read the full document