Is It Fair To Be Tried In Criminal Court

It is fair to be tried in both civil and criminal court for the same alleged actions because they deal with different aspects of the crime. For civil cases, it deals with whether you are liable or not, while in criminal cases it's whether your guilty or not. You can be found not guilty in a criminal case, however, you can still be found liable in civil cases. It is only fair that the victims get awarded damages. Furthermore, it is not against the 5th amendment since the defendant won't be at risk of life or limb in civil cases. Moreover, those found guilty in criminal cases are rarely brought against in civil torts. Clearly, there is nothing wrong with being tried in a criminal and civil court for the same crime.
How the witnesses gained their knowledge is important because it helps the jury or/and judge figure out the whole story. Each witness has their own perspective on what happen and provide evidence that will help the jury figure out who's guilty/liable or not. Witnesses can see what happened, but it may look like a different thing to another witness in a different angle. Moreover, some witnesses are there on the scene earlier than another so they understand more than another witness who might miss interpreting the scene due to the
This prevents them from making decisions based on what they saw someone do and not what they believe is right. Instead of basing their decisions on other court cases, they can make proper judgements on the current case and be open minded and not bias. Additionally, although various court cases are similar, there is always something different. So relying on a different case to make your decision will make the jury blind to the different facts presented. This will cause the jury to make wrong decisions even when the defendant or plaintiff proves their side. This shows that it is lawful for a judge to prevent the jury from being influenced by other