Preview

Is Government Surveillance Necessary

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1615 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Government Surveillance Necessary
Government Surveillance is Legal and Necessary

Since September 11, 2001, the National Security Agency started a program called National Security to help the government collect and monitor information and data from overseas.There are two-hundred million text messages and three million phone calls collected per day to detect terrorist attacks before it happens (King 1). Some attacks are stopped before it happens but there are some that aren't. Let's take 9/11 for example, nineteen hijackers attacked the United States by flying four commercial airlines into the North and South Twin Tower (piloted by Mohamad Atta and Marwan al Shehhi ) , the Pentagon Building in Washington (piloted by Hani Hanjour ), and a Field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania (piloted
…show more content…
The purpose of this program is to protect the national communication system’s integrity and to get information on foreign adversaries’ secret communications. It was created by President Truman and the National Security Council on 11/4/1952. The NSA’s mission is to seek out foreign attacks or contacts. The program engages in anti-terrorist computer network operations. The NSA hacks into the everyday technology we use to see who is contacting foreign enemies. The NSA program isn’t the only surveillance there is. The cameras in stores, banks, schools, and gas stations are all part of government surveillance. Police officers and FBI agents use those cameras to help them out on important cases to put the convict in …show more content…
Surveillance like that is endangering the Fourth Amendment which is “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” This amendment is basically saying that the police and the government agents can’t search people’s homes, workplaces, computers and etc. without a warrant. Most government agents go against that right to help their cases but it’s still wrong. After 9/11, people that was coming from other countries and to get searched without a warrant, which is going against the 4th amendment. It was called the ‘’border search’’ (Buren 1). People come into this country to be free from the lack of protection from their leaders and for them to get searched when the get of the plane is unnecessary. They have the same rights as us when they stepped foot on U.S. grounds. The Department of Justice use Subpoena to tap into people's Facebook and Google records (Buren 1). They believe they have authority to do that because when using the Subpoena you don't have to interact with the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Does the NSA have a good enough reason to spy on its own citizens along with the other billions of foreigners when there are laws implemented to stop that exact act? Is it necessary to create more terrorists because of the hate towards this program, just to possibly catch the current ones we face now? What is the real end goal? Is it to create a black mail mega-data for the government to have insurance due to the debt? Maybe the U.S.A is planning a global attack themselves, or it really is meant to stop terroristic acts against the United States.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Pros And Cons

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page

    September 11 2001, marked a very tragic day in history, and immediate action was required in order to handle the situation. During the Bush administration, surveillance programs were put into place in order to monitor possible hostile actions towards our country. In a post Snowden article in 2006, Robert A. Levy went into depth about what Article II is and if current programs put into place can be deemed illegal. After reviewing Article II and Levy’s position I agree that it was illegal, but I believe that this was because what need to take place was described vaguely and was left up to interpretation. The fourth amendment speaks about using “reasonableness,” what might be reasonable to one may not mean the same to another. Due to this, abuse…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While terrorism is not a new phenomenon to the human race, the past ten years have ushered in a previously unfamiliar rise in terrorism attacks on U.S. domestic soil. This problem has posed a significant challenge to U.S. national security which both government and commercial entities have so far struggled to adequately address and prevent.…

    • 17193 Words
    • 69 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    AL Week 2 DIS 1 1

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I have to say when you look at the past few decades are nation did not have the technology, man power and the resource that we have today. In doing so “The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has wrestled with a variety of significant challenges, including coordinating across 22 preexisting agencies, reporting to a multitude of congressional committees, and interacting with the U.S. public in a manner that constantly tests the balance between security and privacy”. “Some have questioned and pointed out these challenges of evidence to Homeland Security that maybe they are dysfunctional of a department which is unable to effectively protect the nation”. When looking at this ever since the United States have been working constantly to help make Homeland Security better The Department of Homeland Security shows that there were no major attacks on American soil recently. After 9/11 the nation has grown stronger and the technology improves every day. In doing so “DHS must find ways to increase the nation’s defenses against cyberattacks, establish enhanced systems for secure screening and credentialing, and improve intelligence and information sharing, in all while operating in a constrained fiscal environment”. As we grow as a nation and the technology gets better every year we will have the knowledge so that hopefully we can get an edge on the terrorist. The bottom line is that when you look at this the terrorist is always one step…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When it comes to protecting and saving lives of the American people, private invasion used in order to locate and capture potential terrorist should be unlimited. The 911 attack has provided active proof to the American peoples of the damage that terrorist groups can impose on our society. Therefore, invading the privacy of individuals may prevent future terrorist attacks.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Current statistics show, “the US National Security Agency (NSA) is collecting the telephone records of tens of millions of Americans… on an ‘ongoing daily basis’” (BBC News). They also spy on the internet traffic on the most popular websites such as Google, Yahoo!, Facebook, and YouTube in search of any possible “threats” against the United States. Many people are not only angered because the government can track the nation’s communications, but also because the uses of high-tech surveillance technologies that are owned by the government are not entire known. The NSA uses their surveillance technology to monitor many people’s lives. This surveillance takes away people’s privacy but is necessary in our time because many terrorist organizations…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    It sought 1) to improve sharing of information between law enforcement and foreign intelligence agencies; 2) to gather antiterrorism intelligence by taking advantage of the flexible warrants requirement of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA); 3) to expand wiretap authority over electronic communications; 4) to seize funding utilized in terrorist activities; and 5) to impose mandatory detention and deportation of non-U. S. citizens who are suspected of having links to terrorist organization (Christopher P. Banks. 2004. “Protecting (or Destroying) Freedom through Law: The USA PATRIOT Act’s Constitutional Implications.” American National Security and Civil Liberties in an Era of Terrorism. David B. Cohen and John W. Wells. New York: Palgrave…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Fourth Amendment does not allow searches of personal items unless a warrant is used, but by tracking information on people it could help detect terrorism threats sooner. For example, President Obama claims that the data-collection programs “help prevent terrorism (Transcript: Obamas Remarks 4.3).” Even though people do not need a warrant to use these programs, people examine the phone numbers and length of calls, and by doing this it could ultimately protect the country from terrorism threats. Also, the U.S. Patriotism Act enables law enforcement agencies to search through “email and telephone communications, medical, financial, and library records (Legal Information Institute 1.1).” Furthermore, whenever the intelligence gathering community…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Liberties

    • 819 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Protection of civil liberties and civil rights is conceivably one of the most fundamental political values in American culture. As the Fourth Amendment commends “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The government and the NSA have violated this prestige amendment by not respecting the privacy of innocent Americans throughout the country. Understanding their mentality and how they are handling these situations to protect the nation under certain circumstances is one way to look at this, but also keeping in mind having them wiretap into everything we do is going overboard. With the top secret program the NSA has acquired ‘PRISM’ allows the United States intelligence community to access information from nine internet…

    • 819 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government is not spending enough time and resource in surveillance, which is resulting in the threats and decrease of national security. Surveillance is the act of observing, or monitoring a person. Monitoring a person can include the use of cameras, wiretaps, GPS tracking, and internet surveillance. Events such as the Oklahoma City bombing, and the attack on 9/11 lead to a law former President Bush passed. "On October 26th, 2001, Bush signed into law the USA Patriot Act." (Podesta) Government surveillance is an essential part of everyday life because not only does it keep the country under control, but ensures safety for Americans.…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result of the attacks on the date of 9/11, Congress passed the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act made the government’s ability to spy on individuals easier, but also weakened the checks and balances our country relies on. So in essence, the threat of terrorism against our country paved the way for violating one of our basic civil liberties under the fourth amendment of the constitution – the ability to live free of unreasonable searches and seizures. However, the ability for government agencies to obtain information quickly and without warning becomes a powerful tool against terrorism.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patriot Act Essay

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The House of Representatives passed the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 on October 24, 2001. This is also known as the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was designed to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world and to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools (USA Patriot Act, 2001). Honestly I believe that the Patriot Act is beneficial to America, in order to keep everyone safe and unharmed. The U.S. Government does have a right to wiretap, if it is going to prevent everyone from becoming harmed. The Act allows the government to access business records with no hassle. Last “Sneak and peek” search warrants can help prevent evidence from disappearing, which can be accommodating to cases. The Patriot Act provides safety to all Americans in order to fight terrorism…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As far as it is known, there is nothing illegal about the NSA programs and there is no evidence to prove abuse if authority, well other than the obvious issues. The NSA knows all and sees all, they have the ability to keep what they do a secret and if a story were to surface, they have the ability to make sure it never gets out to the public. Americans will remain left out of what goes on behind closed doors, what the NSA wants to remain silenced will remain deadly quiet. The NSA happens to be protected by checks and balance and is put into place to keep the country safe of any real threats, but there is little to no privacy. Snowden spoke about how they live in a world where every interaction with a person and action is done is documented. Meaning, the government has pushed passed its limits and goes beyond spoken efforts to find out the information they need with or without a court appeal. In this very moment, what is happening is being documented as unusual “Evidence” needed to keep safely filed for NSA’s future…

    • 2200 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    All the countries establish in its political constitution and in its legislation, the duty of the government to look over the life of its citizens, protecting them from the risk: the internal threats (inside the proper country) and external (outside the country) That is why, it is admitted, and it is even required, that the government possess a structure of intelligence that resists the action of dangerous forces, however lately, it has been found that in order to get information that may be useful to protect citizens , the government itself reach private information from all its citizens as well. That is why this essay aims to point out the risks this action (spying) implies for all and aims to answer thereupon,” Why government should not spy on us.”…

    • 806 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We might think no one else either knows or cares what we get up to, as long as we compliance the law, unless we are a celebrity. But with massive development of technology, that is no longer the case and I totally agreed with the statement that we are living in a surveillance society. Moreover, I strongly believed that the level of surveillance will grow even further in the future.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays