In the beginning of the article, Carr writes that after he gets used to surfing the Net, he finds it is hard for him to concentrate on reading as long as he used to do (589). Beginning the paragraph with this personal experience, Carr not only brings up his argument that the Internet weakens people’s capacity for deep reading and concentration, but also he makes his audience reflect on their own related experience to understand his argument. The anecdotes help Carr set up a sitting for its audience to follow his logic better. After leading the audience to the setting and states his arguments, he introduces a research study conducted by scholars from UCL. The research shows that people exhibit “a form of skimming activity” and avoid reading long passage online (590). The research result also indicates that “there are signs that new forms of ‘reading’ are emerging”. By introducing the research, Carr intends to show that his argument is rooted from factual studies. As a result, when he summarizes the research finding on the emergence of a new reading pattern caused by the Internet, Carr verifies his argument that the way in which he reads and thinks deeply is changing because of the…
information not allowing our brain to work hard enough. Carr claims, "the internet has altered his…
In the short essay “Is Google Making us Stupid?” Carr talks about how the Internet is messing with his mind and making him have a harder time…
Some who are opposed to Nicholas Carr’s article say that the internet brings positive aspects to our culture. Through the power of the Internet and technology, we have been able to make great medical advances. We are also able to communicate with almost anyone from anywhere in the world by using the Internet. Instead of it taking weeks to months for information to get across the state or the country we can now send out information quickly to everyone in the…
When we search something we automatically believe what is stated on the internet because we think technology is more intelligent than people. Another think Carr touched upon is that the quality of our knowledge is being sacrificed. There is a generation that doesn’t know life without the Internet and the way that they think. Over time it is only going to get worse. Carr also makes an economic analysis of this new way of thinking and reading. “It’s in their economic interest to drive us to distraction,”…
The general argument made by Nicholas Carr in his work, “From The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains,” is that technology is dangerous to the brain, conditioning the body that they need more technology, and less of anything else. More Specifically, Carr states that, “I used to find it easy to immerse myself in a book or a lengthy article...Now my consideration starts to drift after a page or two” (Carr par. 2). In this passage, Carr is suggesting that the effects of technology and the internet have imposed on him that he needs the internet to function at a proper level. He thinks that this is going to be a problem in the future of society. He is suggesting that we will be unable to communicate…
In chapters seven and eight of the book The Shallows: What The Internet Is Doing To Our Brains Nicholas Carr discusses the effects the internet has on our brain, and the changes it causes not only in our mind but also in our daily lives. It is becoming apparent with every click of the mouse that the internet is not only changing our minds, it’s changing our whole lives and society.…
Whether it be the people a person spends time with or a product they use frequently, they become influenced. The technology that surrounds an individual has the potential to change who they are. The human brain, being the highly adaptable organ that it is, is susceptible to this sort unintentional shift. Carr explains, “As we use what the sociologist Daniel Bell has called our ‘intellectual technologies’— the tools that extend our mental rather than our physical capacities— we inevitably begin to take on the qualities of those technologies.” (Carr 576). This means that in terms of the internet, we are coming into thinking and operating more like it. This way of thinking makes sense why people have adopted ‘text speak’ among other things. Just like the internet, society continues to aim to be efficient, cutting corners to keep things quick. Society becomes what it creates; the digital world parallels the human…
He states that while the Internet can be used to expedite research, it has the harmful effect of “scatter[ing] [people’s] attention and diffus[ing] [people’s] concentration” (230). This consequence goes beyond their interactions with a computer. It carries into their everyday life so that they think broadly but not deeply enough for meaningful connections; Carr descriptively calls these people “pancake people”(). One group that is most at risk is Americans, whom Carr’s essay primarily targets since the United States is the birthplace of the Internet. This is shown because he writes his essay for the Atlantic Monthly, an American publication known for its commentary on social issues. Furthermore, he references 2001: A Space Odyssey at the beginning to draw people into his essay. Since it is an American film, those in the United States are targeted since they are more likely to understand the point Carr makes about the perils of the Internet, which means they are encouraged to think about the effects of the way they interact with the…
The most important and easily pointed out flaw in Carr’s writing is the somewhat cherry-picked evidence he cites constantly throughout his writing. This particular tactic is best summed up by Jonah Lehrer from the New York Times. “There is little doubt that the Internet is changing our brain. Everything changes our brain. What Carr neglects to mention, however, is that the preponderance of scientific evidence suggests that the Internet and related technologies are actually good for the mind. For instance, a comprehensive 2009 review of studies published on the cognitive effects of video games found that gaming led to significant improvements in performance on various cognitive tasks, from visual perception to sustained attention.” Lehrer pokes additional holes in Carr’s argument, citing a 2009 University of California, Los Angeles neuroscience study that seems to indicate that Google searches actually increase the activity in certain parts of the brain known to control selective attention and deliberate analysis when compared to text such as books. It’s hard to say whether or not Lehrer’s article is giving a fair view of Carr’s book, as the evidence appears to be fairly entrenched in the opposite camp. The issue lies with the fact that Carr has been fairly selective with the research he does cite, as he ignores any major scientific…
Carr’s careful use of pathos simplify the audience’s sympathy for his drifting concentration, fidgety habits, and struggle while brightening up their persuasion with images like tripping over hyperlinks and jet skiing over a sea of words. Ethos is appealed to not only in the narrator’s self-consciousness, but the comparison in condition he has to related bloggers and personal scholastic contacts. A simple yes to the article title, finishes with a call for a more absolute picture of how the Internet use affects thought. For this, Carr relies on the logos of scientific research.…
Since the development of Google, there has been a vast amount of information available on various topics or subjects. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” explains and examines the different ways that the internet has been more useful and beneficial, according to the words of the author, Nicholas Carr. According to the readings, the author represents and expresses his thoughts and ideas using logos. Take for instance when Carr expresses that he once was a scuba diver in a sea of words, but now he zips along like a guy on a jet ski (Carr p. 534). Carr expresses that he once was a person who hardly used the internet but now he is one who uses it on a regular basis, making feels that someone has been tinkering with his brain, making it change. No longer does he enjoy reading a book of any length because he cannot sustain concentration on the book. Carr feels that all the time he now spends online is affecting his abilities to concentrate and recognizes that the Internet has been a useful tool for him to search for information and communicate. Carr notes that, unlike footnotes, links send you to the information rather than just refer to it.…
In Nicholas Carr’s article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” published July 2008 in The Atlantic, he discusses the changes that have occurred since people began relying on the internet for information. His main thesis is that the human way of thinking has become impatient and unfocused. Carr supports that by writing “I’m not the only one. When I mention my troubles with reading to friends and acquaintances—literary types, most of them—many say they’re having similar experiences.” He is frustrated that he can no longer sit down and enjoy a long book like he used to.In Nicholas Carr’s article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” published July 2008 in The Atlantic, he discusses the changes that have occurred since people began relying on the internet for information. His main thesis is that the human way of thinking has become impatient and unfocused. Carr supports that by writing “I’m not the only one. When I mention my troubles with reading to friends and acquaintances—literary types, most of them—many say they’re having similar experiences.” He is frustrated that he can no longer sit down and enjoy a long book like he used to.In Nicholas Carr’s article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” published July 2008 in The Atlantic, he discusses the changes that have occurred since people began relying on the internet for information. His main thesis is that the human way of thinking has become impatient and unfocused. Carr supports that by writing “I’m not the only one. When I mention my troubles with reading to friends and acquaintances—literary types, most of them—many say they’re having similar experiences.” He is frustrated that he can no longer sit down and enjoy a long book like he used to.In Nicholas Carr’s article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” published July 2008 in The Atlantic, he discusses the changes that have occurred since people began relying on the internet for information. His main thesis is that the human way of thinking has become impatient and unfocused. Carr…
Google, the search engine that majority of people see when opening up the internet. The website that delivers information for almost any subject imaginable. Think about it, when you have a hard time figuring something out or a question with no answer where do you run to. Most people click open Google on their electronic device without using their brain to think about it. It is more convenient then just popping open a text book or waiting for someone to explain an answer to you. It becomes more of a distraction then help. Google has simply made humans lazy.…
Google is a search engine which is aimed at many different audiences. Thousands of people use Google per day, ranging from children, to even people who are retired. The purpose of Google is to provide people with a means of searching through the vast amount of data on the internet.…