Is Google Making USupid Analysis
Technology can change the way humans live in daily lives, the way we learn and the way we use our faculties of attention. In the articles, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?: What the Internet is doing to our brains” and “Is Google wrecking our memory?” Nicholas Carr and Clive Thompson discusses that humans being are taking over by the use of technology and is affected major parts of our social lives. Carr argues that internet is just a set for people to make money, and how our critical thinking skills and attention span is degrading. While Thompson argues that using technology is an advantage for people to learn more in different ways such as storing information. According to the reading, both authors agree that technology is popular in individuals
…show more content…
Firstly, Carr argues that the internet has greatly affected by readers the loss of concentration. As the author states, “The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle” (Carr). Carr blames the internet for humans not being able to read and think as deeply as before. Secondly, Carr discusses that technologies impact a problem in today's society. As Carr states “Television programs add text crawls and pop-up ads, magazines and newspapers shorten their articles, introduces capsule summaries, and crowd their pages with easy- to-browse-snippets.” The author argues that humans rely on network technology because it is changing our brain structure. However, he also explain that people have depended on the internet that everything that went to a book has become easier to look up on the internet. Lastly, Carr believe that people are not using critical thinking as to interpret the text and interact with information “mere decoders of information” (qtd. in Carr). Maryanne Wolf a psychologist at Tufts University believe that people are not have the capacity of deep reading. Ultimately, Carr discourage the internet and direct the reading to be less …show more content…
Firstly, Thompson argues that human beings remember special details when individuals are into something. As the author states “Baseball fans can reel off stats for their favourite players, then space out on their own birthday” (Thompson). He explains that humans memorize their interest instead of other things that aren't as meaningful. Secondly, the author discuss that humans are incorporating technology into our transactive memory groups. Daniel Wegner, a psychologist from Harvard, has phrased “‘The thinking process of the intimate dyad’ And turns out, this is what we're doing with Google and Evernote and our digital tools” (qtd. in Thompson). In other words, Wegner explains that humans can also search information with technology that they are not familiar with. However, what is transactive memory? Transactive memory is the “art of storing information in the people around us’’ (Thompson). The author states, “We have begun to treat search engines, Evernote and smartphone the way we’ve long treated our spouses, friends and workmates. They’re the handy devices humans use to compensate for their feeble ability to remember detail” (Thompson). He agrees because individuals brains have always been bad at remembering things and humans would use implements for assistance. Finally, Thompson states that human beings are sharing memory to figure information out. As he has informed the reader about
Firstly, Carr argues that the internet has greatly affected by readers the loss of concentration. As the author states, “The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle” (Carr). Carr blames the internet for humans not being able to read and think as deeply as before. Secondly, Carr discusses that technologies impact a problem in today's society. As Carr states “Television programs add text crawls and pop-up ads, magazines and newspapers shorten their articles, introduces capsule summaries, and crowd their pages with easy- to-browse-snippets.” The author argues that humans rely on network technology because it is changing our brain structure. However, he also explain that people have depended on the internet that everything that went to a book has become easier to look up on the internet. Lastly, Carr believe that people are not using critical thinking as to interpret the text and interact with information “mere decoders of information” (qtd. in Carr). Maryanne Wolf a psychologist at Tufts University believe that people are not have the capacity of deep reading. Ultimately, Carr discourage the internet and direct the reading to be less …show more content…
Firstly, Thompson argues that human beings remember special details when individuals are into something. As the author states “Baseball fans can reel off stats for their favourite players, then space out on their own birthday” (Thompson). He explains that humans memorize their interest instead of other things that aren't as meaningful. Secondly, the author discuss that humans are incorporating technology into our transactive memory groups. Daniel Wegner, a psychologist from Harvard, has phrased “‘The thinking process of the intimate dyad’ And turns out, this is what we're doing with Google and Evernote and our digital tools” (qtd. in Thompson). In other words, Wegner explains that humans can also search information with technology that they are not familiar with. However, what is transactive memory? Transactive memory is the “art of storing information in the people around us’’ (Thompson). The author states, “We have begun to treat search engines, Evernote and smartphone the way we’ve long treated our spouses, friends and workmates. They’re the handy devices humans use to compensate for their feeble ability to remember detail” (Thompson). He agrees because individuals brains have always been bad at remembering things and humans would use implements for assistance. Finally, Thompson states that human beings are sharing memory to figure information out. As he has informed the reader about