Preview

Is American Nonviolence Possible Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
744 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is American Nonviolence Possible Summary
In the article “Is American Nonviolence Possible” written in The New York Times by Todd May. He speaks on the violence in America, try to come up with a way for the United States to be less violent. He asks if it’s possible, but it isn’t; America will not be able to become a society which practices nonviolence, because individualism is deeply ingrained in our culture, freedoms granted to us by the constitution support some of what is considered violence, and there are many supporters for the more violent approach to things. The United States may not be that old, but it still may be too old to learn new tricks.
Individualism is the back bone of our country. The U.S was formed, because we wanted to be separated from British rule, we wanted to be our own country. The freedom to do what you want, and make your own life with your own actions is pretty much the motto. The people of the USA are responsible for themselves, and that may make a few people selfish, but it also allow those that strive for greatness to succeed without worrying about, or relying
…show more content…
It’s stated in the article that one of the reasons we are a violent nation is the “decline of our ability to control events in the world” it states “it is clear that the United State cannot impose its will as it did during much of the 20th century. We live in a different world now, and this makes many of us insecure.”(May) This is true, but what it boils down to is fear, when people are afraid they usually do one of two things; fight or run, and the United States fights its fears with military force, and there are many supporters that agree with this ideology. Like Todd states in the article that Americans are very competitive; that competitive nature mixed with fear and insecurity equals the phrase “don’t let the terrorist win”. We gain a “have to get them before they get me” mentality that can’t be easily given

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The premise for the author's argument is that America's high level of panic after 9/11 was actually excessive in relation to the number of deaths. The conclusion is that Americans actually aided the success of the terrorists by giving in to their desire to shake us up so badly.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Violence is not something that should be taken lightly, as there are many consequences that go along with it. Cesar Chavez understands these consequences and actively tries to avoid them. Chaves, a civil rights activist, writes this article to emphasize nonviolence over violence as a modem for an authentic change. Chaves applies the "if...then" structure throughout his article to illustrate the importance of nonviolence.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this trimester, I have studied Paradigm II at Mahidol University International College, which is a core course for the social science division. This course learns about the major paradigms in social sciences during the twentieth century. In the past few months, a lecturer, Eugene Jones, opened a documentary film named Bowling for Columbine. In this film, a filmmaker, Michael Moore, try to find the reason of butchery in the United States. After I watched this film, I had learned that there are numerous reasons why Americans are so violent.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For a long time, the world has been experiencing a lot of situations that include violence and terrorist attacks. One of the most recent happened in Paris when 3 terrorists connected to ISI, which has relation with Al-Qaeda, attacked a newspaper and killed 12 people. Newt Gingrich wrote an article entitled “ We Are Losing the War Against Radical Islam”, which talks about radical Islam and their attacks against the U.S. Gingrich claims that the U.S is failing the mission of stopping Islamic terrorists, and if Congress does not take severe steps to change that situation, Radical Islam will win this War. He states three points to prove how Radical Islam has been approaching the U.S, and each point he exemplifies with previous Islamic attacks against the United States of America. This article is considered credible and convincing due to fact that it utilizes two convincing rhetorical elements, which are evidence…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Individualism comes from the frontier era when a person only had themselves and their family to depend on for survival. It then became the dominant characteristic carried on through American history. The “rugged…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his autobiographical novel, Way of the Peaceful Warrior, Dan Millman story summarizes a young man going to Berkeley having a rich father and never feeling alone while he sleeps at night. He is popular and a famous gymnast, his name is Dan. He doesn’t have a bad side because everyone expects him to be happy which is not true. Dan doesn’t know his inner self that he gets help by Socrates fixing his emotion and his lifestyle. Socrates could change him or destroy him as a person. In addition, Mark attends Stanford university, and is popular in school. Mark is a basketball player and every girl felt in love with him,but didn’t have a girlfriend because he was more focused in school to get a scholarship. Everyone in school knew he’s poor and want to be the first generation in his family to go to college. Dan and Mark went through same and difference experience in their lives.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The history of violence in the world is well documented. However it is also possible to use non-violence to bring about change. This DBQ will look at two countries where a non-violent movement was successful. India and South Africa were two important nations on two different continents. But although they looked strong on the outside, each one suffered from a disease that threatened the health of the whole. For India, the disease was colonization. For South Africa, it was racial segregation. In each of these nations three conditions help explain why non-violence worked. The first condition was that both of them had been colonies of England. And like England both countries thought law was very powerful, more powerful even than government officials. The second condition was the presence of violence. Without the possibility of a violent revolution, the government might not have been willing to change. The third condition was the presence of a leader, Mohandas Gandhi in India and Nelson Mandela South Africa. Each of these men was so charismatic he could lead his followers to a non-violent victory. Both of them gave their lives to the cause. Gandhi was shot by an assassin while Mandela spent almost twenty-seven years of his life in prison.…

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In life, us humans are not able to make all of our own decisions all of the time. Every decision we make is mostly for our own good, but we have to think if it will past other wishes too. The government has wishes that us Americans have to follow and if the rules or laws were to be disobeyed then there will be restrictions or punishments depending on how big the law broke was. America is the land of the free and independent, but no one ever mentions the challenge of personal independence there is.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    War on Terror Facts

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fact is that we are currently fighting a war under terms in which we cannot possibly win, our enemies know it, and they are emboldened by it. Since the beginning of America’s War on Global Terrorism, the number of terrorists in has increased, as have the bombings and casualties, and not just in Iraq. The increase of terrorist activities has increased worldwide, and despite what our leaders tell us, there is no end in sight. If we continue on this course, we will lose this fight. You can win a war against an opposing country or government, but you can’t win a war against an enemy that has no…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I interpreted ahimsa as a principle of nonviolence toward all living things. I incorporated ahimsa into every aspect of my life because violence is there through all of it. I noticed I caught myself a lot especially when I was being violent to myself through negative thoughts. I also noticed I was much happy thinking less violently. Although it is not 100% possible to be nonviolent, I still think I did my best. I am never violent towards my friends, family, or siblings because I know I cannot afford to lose them, they are the people that have brought me to the place I am today. I am very cautious when it come to my behaviors and I think of how they will affect others. I am usually pretty nonviolent when it comes to my behaviors towards others…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are Americans truly so remarkably individualistic? Is it true that we are? For instance, are we more dedicated individualists than individuals in those communist looking countries of Europe? The appropriate response seems, by all accounts, to be no. The possibility that individual freedom characterizes America is profoundly established and shared over the political range. The way of life radicals of the '60's seen themselves as to be beneficiaries to this American custom of self-verbalization; today, it invigorates the Accommodating party change, walking around shield singular adaptability from the covering handle of European-style gathering.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When there’s violence, the world tends to go crazy and get out of hand. On the other hand, non-violence keeps the people calmer and tends to keep them quieter. While some may argue that violence is the most effective way for change, it is actually more logical that non-violence is the most effective because in source 2 it states “Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and establish such creative tension that a community that has consistently refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. This proves that violence is not the answer because it can lead to injuries, protests, and irrational behavior. We have a significant opportunity in America to build a greater nation, a nation where all men will live together peacefully, and calmly, but with violence, it is very difficult to do so. Martin Luther King Jr. once said in his Letter from a Birmingham Jail (Source 2) “This wait has almost always meant never”. If people don’t act and put a stop to violence, the world will never become calm. Non-violence is more significant than violence because it keeps us calmer and relaxed, rather than anxious to see what will happen…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If we aren’t individual then how would America be the land of hope? Individuality tells the world that they can come here and be free to be themselves. When people come here they hope to have a better life. Coming to America means that you have your freedom and individuality. If you go to North Korea you are not allowed to have any individuality. Then you look at America and all you see is diversity. There are many different cultures here. The many different cultures, races, and beliefs are what make America such an individual from the rest of the world. The individuality is what makes America what it is today. It’s the reason so many people want to leave their home to come here for a new life. Coming here lets them be free and be who they want to be. That’s why coming here is full of hope and dreams. When you live in America you have the right to do whatever you want and be whoever you want to be with no worries. In some countries that is not allowed and when you come here it’s such a luxury to have. You take advantage. Individuality is what makes America. It’s the part that makes this the land of the free. You have rights and it lets you be who you want. Other places don’t always offer that and that is what makes America have individuals that we have…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government Intervention

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The USA is a right wing’d country. They do not like a high level of government involvement in politics, just enough to protect the “unalienable rights” that are “endowed by their creator”. The USA from an economic standpoint does not like the ideas of collectivism, where everyone helps one another. It is common practice for there to be fierce competition between businesses and one another. This idea of individualism has many positives such as competition driving up quality and down prices so they are able to sell more product, but also some negatives. Some negatives include the fact that if you fail in the system where everyone is on your own it may be hard for one to ‘get back on their feet’. These right wing ideas are based off of Locke’s ideological standpoint. Locke's believed that government should only be in place to protect and affirm the rights of the people, not to intervene in the economy or politics farther than it needs to to protect these rights. Locke believed that people should compete for resources and compete against one another. He felt that man by nature were kind and would not steal resources, which is opposite of Hobbes and how he felt the nature of man was naturally evil and bad. The source shows how the USA supports Locke's right wing’d vision in the quotation “whenever…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The core values of the American government are liberty, individualism, equality, and self-government (Patterson, 2013, p. 9). The first American fundamental principle is liberty, and that each person should be free to think and respond as they choose too as long as they do not infringe unreasonably on the freedom of others well-being (Patterson, 2013, p. 9). The principle of individualism allows each person to take the initiative to be self-reliant as well as being able to take control of their lives (Patterson, 2013, p. 10). However, all individuals should take on the responsibility for making effective decisions concerning their lives and livelihood. Not to mention, that each citizen should not rely solely on the government and the community…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays