Irhr 1001

Topics: Motivation, Maslow's hierarchy of needs, Organizational studies and human resource management Pages: 7 (1944 words) Published: January 22, 2013
Newcastle Business School

IRHR 1001

Cover Page

* Student Name: Paulina Ma (3119171)
* Tutorial Group: B2
* Tutor Name: Fiona Schafer
* Date of submission: 24 October 2010

Lecturer: Dr Peter Waring
Course Coordinator: Mr John Dugas

Nowadays, most companies’ goal is to maximise its profit. To do so, the component of the company must cooperate with each other. The senior (CEO and managers) must build a good relationship with the junior (employees) in order to know the thought of the employees. After understanding the thought and the needs of the workers, the next step is applying motivation theory to the employees in order to achieve the goal of the company. There are many motivation theories in managing human resources, but none is universally accepted. Each theory has its strength and weakness. It depends on the senior thought to decide which theory they will use to motivate their workers. This essay will discuss about the content theory of Herzberg Motivation-Hygiene Theory and the process theory of Adam’s Equity Theory. It also discusses how job design can affect employee’s motivation and the similarities and differences from both theories.

Content theories
Content theories explain the needs of individuals that required individual to fulfil them, factors that motivate people in workplace and what drive people behaviour. There are four pioneers in content theory of motivation: Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs Theory, Herzberg’s Motivation-Hygiene Theory, Alderfer's ERG Theory, McClelland’s Theory of Needs, and McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y.

The Motivation-Hygiene Theory 
Frederick Herzberg was an American psychologist and professor of management (Herzberg 1968). He was known for acquainting job enrichment and Motivation-Hygiene Theory into business management. This theory is a result from a research study made by Frederick Herzberg and his partners (Mausner & Snyderman) at the University of Pittsburgh in 1950s. Some studies do find similarities between Herzberg’s and Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory which divides the need of an employee into two level, high-order needs (self-actualisation needs and esteem needs) and lower-order need (social needs, salary needs and physiological needs), but yet there is no strong evidence to support those similarities.

Herzberg’s Motivation-Hygiene Theory was based on the result of the survey of 200 engineers and accountants in Pittsburgh that he made in 1950s. Each subject was asked to describe the time in their work is when they felt happy and unhappy and the description of events that give them positive and negative feeling. And as a result from the survey, Herzberg concluded that there are two-factor theory that affects an employee performance on workplace.

Satisfier or motivator on the job
What satisfies and motivates employees in workplace is called motivation factors. Each subject from the research study pointed a different factor that motivates them in workplace. As a conclusion from the survey, Herzberg concluded that there are 6 factors that motivate workers on their work. These factors related to job content; intrinsic factors that are related to workers’ work. Motivator factors leads to a higher effort, performance and satisfaction of an employee to their job. Motivation factors are required if managers want to maximise workers performance in workplace. According to Herzberg, workers will not perform maximum in their work if one of these factors are absent (Wood 2006). An absence of one of these factors can caused dissatisfaction on work. Similarly, if all the factors are present, it can cause job satisfaction (Ivancevich & Matteson 1999). These factors are similar to Maslow’s higher order need.

Based on Herzberg’s survey, the 6 factors that motivate a worker in workplace are: * Achievement
Employee performing well on their jobs in order to achieve something such as: promotion, bonus,...

Bibliography: Brannick, M. T. and Levine, E. L., 2002. Job analysis. CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Hackman, J. R. 1976. Work design. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
Herzberg, F. 1968. One more time: how do you motivate employees?. Harvard Business Review, vol. 46(1), pp. 53–62.
Herzberg, F., 2008. One more time: how do you motivate employees?. Harvard Business Review, 65(5), pp.109-120. 
Ivancevich, J. M. and Matteson, M. T., 1999. Organizational behaviour and management. 5th ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Lambert, L., 2008. Exit stage right. HRMonthly, February Issue, pp. 28-31.
Locke, 1976. Organizational behavior: affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, p. 282.
Wood, J. et al., 2006. Organisational behaviour core concepts and applications. Milton Qld: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Irhr Essay
  • CLAW 1001 Case Study Essay
  • CSP 1001 Essay
  • Irhr Report Essay
  • MGMT 1001 Essay
  • 1001 nights Essay
  • Essay on 1001 Nights
  • ENGL 1001 Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free