Iran's Development of Nuclear Weapons: a Realist and Constructivist Perspective

Powerful Essays
Iran’s Development of Nuclear Energy:
A Realist and Constructivist Perspective

Iran’s development of nuclear energy includes the advancement of nuclear technologies encompassing a uranium enrichment program and construction of facilities such as power reactors and heavy water reactors, which is subject to a thick haze of repudiation that incorporates an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) investigation (Kerr, 2014, pp. 1-3). The understanding of the abovementioned nuclear developments in Iran shift when integrating different lenses of international theories. This paper will demonstrate this manifestation with respect to the philosophy of classical realism and constructivism, such that, how realist models focus on power and security within the international system and constructivist models highlights questions of identity and its perception (Sherrill, 2012, p. 1).
To stipulate further, through a realist perspective, analysing the concept of the security dilemma and Iran’s national interests, especially with regard to how power and security establishes why the development of nuclear energy in Iran and the haze around it including its effect on other states is important power in the global community and that national security is extremely influential. Conversely, a constructivist would observe socially constructed identities with interests and rationality constitutive to each other that drive the motivation in this developmental avenue and establishes the importance of interaction between states and the strength of a state’s identity in formulating interests. The haziness that surrounds this program is socially constructed and is a direct reflection of the social overtones and confusion between Iran’s interests and identities and that of other states.
Realism is an ideological disposition informed by fundamental ideas, where, at its core accents the constraints produced by human nature and the notion of ‘the survival of the fittest’. This ultimately



Bibliography: Adler, J. (1997). Seizing the Middle Groumd: Constructivism in World Politics. Europian Journal of International Relations, 319-363. Bozdaglioglu, Y. (2007). Constructivsm and Identity Formation: An Interactive Approach. Uluslararasi Hukuk ve Politika, 121-144. Donnelly, J. (2000). Realism and International Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2014). Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Board of Directors. Kerr, P. K. (2014). Iran 's Nuclear Program: Tehran 's Compliance with International Obligations. Congressional Research Service. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York and London: W W Norton & Company. Mostofi, K. (2013, 11 25). Iran. Retrieved from Britannica Encyclopaedia : http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/293359/Iran RT News Sagan, S. D. (1996). Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons?: Three Models in Search of a Bomb. International Security, 54-86. Sherrill, C. W. (2012). Why Iran Wants the Bomb and What it Means for US Policy. Nonproliferation Review, 31-49. Tim Dunne, M. K. (2006). Structural Realism. In J. J. Mearsheimer, International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity (pp. 71--88). Oxford: Oxfrod University Press. Toft, P. (2005). John J. Mearsheimer: an offensive realist between geopolitics and power. Journal of International Relations and Development, 381-408.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rather than use militarization or be tough on iran which would encourage a hostile relationship, the U.S. should approach Iran’s nuclear ambitions by talking to Iranian leaders and persuade them that developing nuclear weapons would not be the best thing for iran’s national interests. Rather than leading to stabilization and the mad situation, it would probably lead to political coercion which would tempt other neighboring Arab countries to proliferate as well and would highlight rivalries, particularly…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Iran Nuclear Program and OIC -Background of Iran Nuclear Program; how could such program come to the existence? What has motived Iranian government to do so? -What is Iran Nuclear Program and its importances?; To what extent does the program affect the international stage? Threatened? -What actors involved in the program? (Iran, UN, the U.S., Israel, OIC) -What is the role of OIC in supporting the program? -Current status Introduction (Background knowledge of Iran's Nuclear Program) ***info…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 2870 Words
    • 12 Pages

    IRLS211 Week 5-6 Iran’s Nuclear Program “…Look at it in the totality of the picture. And the picture is you 've got undeclared …nuclear activity, deliberate misinformation on nuclear activity, development of delivery systems, and other technical research that, added all up, paints a very troubling picture.” (Ereli, 2004). These remarks, given by J. Adam Ereli, a
State Department Deputy Spokesman, sums up the nuclear program and intentions of Iran. Although on multiple occasions Iran declared…

    • 2870 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear Weapon

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages

    that nuclear weapons are vital shields for the planet. They claim that nuclear weapons are deterrents that prevent the world from breaking out in total war. Researchers are supporting this argument by declaring how nuclear weapons have been keeping peace. However, other researchers and scientists deny the effectiveness of nuclear weapons as deterrents and declare that nuclear weapons will lead the world into total devastation. Many people throughout the world state that nuclear weapons have sparked…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nuclear Weapons

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nuclear Weapons On August 1954, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cites of Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing over two hundred thousands instantly and more over time due to radiation and other injuries. These two bombs ended World War II and changed the public’s view of nuclear energy. Those bombs were the only nuclear weapons used in any war, but there were many more detonated for tests.(1) During a speech about the nuclear test ban Kennedy said “Eighteen years ago the advent of nuclear…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nuclear Weapons

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nuclear Weapons Non-Proliferation is a limitation of production such as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The big five: United States, Britain, France, China, and former Soviet Union agreed to dismantle arsenals and signatory nations would not possess nuclear weapons (Conn). Although North Korea has become the world’s ninth nuclear power, they withdrew from the treaty in January 2003. Since then, North Korea processed enough plutonium for five nuclear bombs (Norris). America should and does…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear Weapons

    • 2083 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Nuclear weapons were first developed by the United States prior to the start of World War ll. The first and only times that nuclear weapons were used in battle was against Japan in 1945. The United States dropped two different style of nuclear weapons on two different Japanese cities. One bomb used plutonium while the other used uranium to create the explosions. The bombs were dropped on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945 and Nagasaki on August 9, 1945. Estimates of deaths within the four months after…

    • 2083 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    nuclear weapon

    • 742 Words
    • 2 Pages

    after the second World War some countries have revised their nuclear weapons programme, nuclear weapons still today are considered to be an established currency of politics and security. While the nuclear weapons states have agreed on a legally binding commitment to nuclear disarmament, they continue to rely heavily on such weapons in their security doctrines and continue to invest and modernise their arsenals. The way towards nuclear disarmament has many different paths and there are several approaches…

    • 742 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Weapon

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nuclear Weapons Since, a long period of time we have the invention of nuclear weapons of GLOBAL peace and constancy. Is it really right to say that nuclear weapons are peacemakers? Or they are killing weapons? Nuclear weapons are a volatile device that deduces its destructive force from the reactions of nuclear, either nuclear fission or a combination of both fission and fusion. Both chemical reaction releases huge quantities of energy from comparatively small amount matter. Simply, nuclear weapons…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays