Preview

IR Realism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1338 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
IR Realism
What is realism? What is global politics? How do they become hand in hand? Is the realist theoretical approach the most appropriate for understanding global politics? These are some of the most prevalent questions asked. This essay will seek to discuss how realism and its main principles can be useful in understanding current events in international relations.
According to online source, vocabulary.com, realism is the way how we perceive things in life, accepting them for what they are. Realism is dated back to ancient Greece which later extended beyond the Western world to India and China. Modern realism emerged on the eve of World War II, when the prevailing belief in a natural harmony of interest among states came under attack. However, global politics is the field of study on issues and people around the world by applying theoretical principles like economic relations, the gap between rich and poor; democracy, its economic and political benefits; human rights and the different emphasis placed on rights by different societies; war and peace; ethnic conflict; the environment; and power. With the words of Burchill (2001), realism is considered the most influential theoretical approach in international relations.
With realist states, they pay special mind to themselves and expect the worst because they have no global government or higher authority to enforce rules or claims. It then can be said that states go after power and capabilities that are materialistic in hopes of survival in a world full of uncertainty and anarchy. The current issue in global news about United States and Iran’s possible nuclear deal is one example of the realist theoretical approach in understanding global politics. The way how I see it the United States and Iran will never have the capacity to trust each other on account of political agitation, vulnerability and key engages. After all Iran have a reputation, one in which fellow states would think twice of approving such deal mere fact



Bibliography: Emerging details of possible Iranian nuclear deal draw bipartisan ire. (2015, March 28). Retrieved March 30, 2015, from http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/03/28/emerging-details-iranian-nuclear-deal-draws-bipartisan-ire/ Realism - Dictionary Definition. (n.d.). Retrieved March 30, 2015, from http://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/realism Global politics. (n.d.). Retrieved March 30, 2015, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_politics A Review of Realism 's Contributions to IR. (n.d.). Retrieved March 30, 2015, from http://www.e-ir.info/2013/04/26/a-review-of-realisms-contributions-to-ir/ International Politics. (n.d.). Retrieved March 30, 2015, from http://www.sparknotes.com/us-government-and-politics/political-science/international-politics/section2.rhtmlhttp://us-iran-relations.com/wordpress/?page_id=65 Kegley, C., & Blanton, S. (2014). World politics: Trend and transformation, 2013-2014 update edition (2013-2014 update Ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    References: Barone, M. & McCutchen, C. (2011). Almanac of American Politics 2012. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.…

    • 2051 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    WK 5 Assignment

    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The International Relations theory that best fits the Gini-out-of-the-bottle approach for this report is the theory of realism. There are five different classes of realism but the two that stands out to me are classic and neorealism. Classic realism leans towards those that represent a pessimistic view and the fact that people are not often what they appear to be and they it would behoove a government not to be so trusting of others. Neorealism represents the struggle of someone that is greedy for more such as power.…

    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is progressive realism? According to Smith, these are the premises. One, implicit boundaries on the notions of nation-states. Two, non-state actors and international organizations play significant roles. Three, state preferences, are the prime determinant of international behavior. Four, states do not necessarily compete with each other. Five, cooperation can yield mutual gains for participating states, even military power, is not always the most effective means to guarantee survival and security (Smith, 2013 p.336).…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While it may appear that a government made a certain decision to help a struggling country, or start a war in the name of spreading democracy or bringing an end to terrorism, their true goals lie in much more selfish matters. For instance, a country might send an army into Africa to put a stop to an uprising of rebel soldiers, but on the back side they begin exporting valuable resources to their homeland. Realists believe that power, not peace, is the main focal point of political interest, a hypothesis which can easily be tested by observing the actions taken by previous governments throughout history. By focusing on the study of political power, realists create a continuity of analysis of policy: each state can be analyzed in terms of power politics. Notwithstanding, Morgenthau warns against two common misconceptions: the first would be trying to understand the motives of governing individuals and groups. This is a mistake because motives don 't always align to actual policy or the outcomes of said policies; and the second misconception is the alignment of ideology with action. Put simply, Morgenthau believed that a policy may be made to seem that it has the intentions of the people, or a cause the people believe in, at heart when the reality is that the policy is truly a means to gain additional power. Although it may sound rather obvious. Morgenthau warns that policy has been repeatedly guided by legal and moral guidelines instead of strictly political considerations. As a result, the power of a country and the welfare of its citizens have been routinely endangered. Instead, realism advocates that policy must arise out of purely political analysis. With that being said politics become a bit more translucent. If one were to follow the history of…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Firstly, “realist” when a realist is to be defined in international relations we are ... Secondly, defining the term “human nature” in the context of this question; ...…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical realism has mainly come to be associated with Hans Morgenthau who is said to have had the largest impact on the field. This theory is mainly state level based and highlights that all people are greedy, aggressive, insecure and thus the same states that govern these people must have the same characteristics as the people make the state and the state is defined by the people present. Realists believe that power politics is a law of human behavior. Thus meaning it is in bred within all humans to thirst for power and it is that same drive for power and the motivation to dominate and have authority over others evolve into the fundamental aspects of human nature. Seeing as classical realists believe this, they tend to see international politics and power politics are all equivalent. Hans J. Morgenthau explained in many of his works that to…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Aljazeera, America (2012) Israeli PM sets 'red line ' over nuclear Iran. Aljazeela, America, [online] 28/09. Available at: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/americas/2012/09/2012927154228135624.html.…

    • 3341 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many theories demonstrate insight into the concept of war, international relations and domestic relations. Realism and liberalism provide pictures that relate and coexist, yet are opposite in theory. Realism is conservative and pessimistic. Realists plan for permanence of the current international state of affairs. Liberalism is progressive and optimistic. Liberals believe change is necessary and inevitable. Neither viewpoint gives us the right or wrong side as both contain truths depending on circumstances. International politics relies on all players in order to be complete. No one theory or example can cover all situations. Realist and liberalist theories provide contrasting views on actors, goals, and instruments of international affairs.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carr, Morgenthau, Reinhold Niebuhr and George Kennan consider that international relations should be realistic, as opposed to the realistic ones, although, a few years later, R. Ashley discards realism because it is undermined by „international antinomies” and because it is far from being a „harmonious tradition”. M.J. Smith, Roger Speagle and K. Goldmann favour the same conclusion, claiming that this collection of ideas which are labelled „realism” is so vagne and incoerent that is wrong to believe in the very existence of Realism and of converging points of view.…

    • 5081 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The theory of Realism has been the dominant theory in International Relations since the inception of the field of study almost a century ago. However over time the theory-which attempts to explain the actions of states, and the international system as a whole-has given rise to much criticism. Though it may have been the most rational way of looking at International Relations in the early 1900's, much has changed since then. The world has been through two World Wars, and many more regional conflicts and has seen how truly wrong things can go in the hunt for power. This in addition to the formation of the United Nations, NATO, and many other international organizations has made Idealism a more tenable candidate than Realism in providing a framework to explain International Relations.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rather than focusing on individual state’s power, the theory tends to focus on the distribution of that power in the system. This distribution of power is a result of a constant disposition of the system to war. However, as a conflict between interests of states always exists, they tend to go on war only in certain conditions of the polarity of the system. Kenneth Waltz defined three types of polarity in the world: unipolar, bipolar and multipolar (Keohane, 1986). A position of a certain state in the system determines its behaviour and functions, with which it is obliged with in the international system.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From their perspective, the international settings are made up of sovereign states which were developed by Thucydides after he was empowered by the signing of the Westphalia treaty. From the realists’ perspective, every country should exercise its rights to defend its borders, interests, and citizens (Ahmed, 2007). The conflicts in which North Korea is currently involved can be related to the realism theory noting that North Koreas decision to develop nuclear weapons is in view of protecting its interests and to discourage the invasion of its international borders. Concerns have however been raised regarding the influence of possessing nuclear weapons on a supposed uncontrollable Kim Jong-un the current North Korea leader. The realists assume that interrelations among countries are formed based on their military power and economic advantages. The realism theory can, therefore, be identified as propagating the need for a country to possess superior military power such as the nuclear weapons to gain respect among other nations while discouraging any plans to invade its territories. However, it can also be pointed out that the series of sanctions that have restricted the development in North Korea is due to its adoption of a realists approach towards international issues (Ashley, 1981). North Koreas resistance to the international laws that…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    International Relations

    • 2731 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Realism is an international relations theory which states that world politics is driven by competitive self-interest.[1]…

    • 2731 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Realism

    • 1464 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Realism as a philosophy flourished in the 18th and 19th century and was revived after the Second World War. E.H Carr, George Kennan, Thompson, Schumann and Morgenthau were its leading exponents. Morgenthau is generally recognized as its main proponent. He was the first one to develop a realist model and the central focus of realism, according to him was power. His theory was developed in the form of six principles of political realism. Following are those six principles:…

    • 1464 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Realist approach is an important approach related to the study of international Politics. It based on really and tries to explain International Politics in context to reality. This approach revolves around two important elements viz, security and power. The supporters of Realist Approach believe that struggle for power is reality and we can not understand International Politics by ignoring this fact. Realist Approach is an old theory and it was there even in 18th and 19th century. But in International Politics this theory or view point became popular after Second world war and scholars like Max Weber, E.H. Car, Frederick Schuman, Nicholas Spykman, Reinhold Nicbuhr, Arnold Wolfers, Kenneth Thompson, George F. Kennan, Hans J. Morgenthau, Henry Kissinger. Hans. J. Morgenthau is considered the chief exponent of Realist Approach. He has responsible for building a realist model of international relations which seeks to explain all aspects of the struggle for power among nations.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays