Iphone Security Issues

Information breaks, hacking and device thievery is a standard piece of cutting edge life. So as to protect clients, Apple and Google added extremely viable security components to their phone working frameworks making them effectively unlockable. However, the FBI wants Apple to diminish advancements it has made on encryption programming, contending this is making it less demanding for fear based oppressors and different unsafe people to dodge identification.
It requested that Apple makes an "indirect access" to hack into the iPhone of one of the expired San Bernardino shooters. Apple, which has collaborated completely with the examination to this point, has declined to make a method for breaking iPhone encryption as it would expose hundreds of millions of IPhone users, violating their privacy and their civil rights. However, the FBI got their desired result by accessing the iPhone with the assistance of a third-party.
If this is done with this one phone, what will prevent the government from compelling Apple and other organizations to hack into different gadgets? Another key point is if the US government can force Apple to get into a specific gadget, won't different governments request the same power?
The underlying ethical issue for this situation is the contention between the two legitimate values: Security vs. Privacy. Both values are vital in a democratic society. Studies have demonstrated that when presented with an either/or situation, people, most likely will opt for security to the damage of privacy and even to the loss of freedom. In this case, People are influenced to believe that Apple should comply with the FBI in the matter of national security but fail to realize the long-term consequences that this could have on data security and