Preview

Introduction to Forensic Investigations

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2352 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Introduction to Forensic Investigations
Locard’s Exchange Principle and the use of Fingerprints:
Edmond Locard (1877-1966) was a French scientist specialised in both medicine and law. Inspired by the work of Hans Gross, it was Edmond that created the concept that all objects of any material should leave traces of itself upon whatever it touches, even if it is the minutest amount, simply put as “Every Contact leaves a trace,” Locard (1923). This is commonly known as Locard’s Exchange Principle. He believed that in circumstances such as a crime, his principle could be used to find evidence of who and perhaps even how that crime was committed by finding small materials, either physical or chemical at the scene of the crime that would directly link back to the offender.

Fingerprints are a classic example of what could be left by an offender at the scene of a crime that could prove he or she was there. So far, there have never been two fingerprints that have been found the same among the global population; therefore, it is inductive to believe that there are no fingerprints that are the same. Until two fingerprints are found that are indeed identical in shape and pattern then this belief cannot be falsified. Sir Karl Popper was a famous philosopher who wrote, that any theory that could not be falsified and tested to be `wrong`, could not possibly be a “scientific” experiment. The fact that Locard’s Principle explains that `every contact leaves a trace`, would surely mean that the exchange takes place between all the objects in contact. If a glass cup was placed on a wooden table, according to Locard’s principle there should be small particles of wood on the glass and glass on the wood! This exchange though is just so tiny that we today do not have the technology to prove it, therefore Locard’s Principle cannot be falsified as we can’t prove or disprove that there is an exchange.
Referring back to the method of fingerprint DNA as evidential proof of a crime, an example of this would be if Forensic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Light Blue Lab Report

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages

    To begin with, each DNA fingerprint had no more than one band. This made it impossible to figure out who committed the crime because there was no available comparison to the crime scene DNA.…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Science 9.07 lab

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Forensic Scientists examine tiny fingerprint details. These may be loops,dots, forks, islands. Several comparison points must be perfectly matched for two fingerprints to be considered identical…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - A fingerprint may be small and unnoticeable to the eye, and even look like many other peoples, but they are in fact very different. Every fingerprint has a different pattern that is unique and unlike anyone else’s. I compared two fingerprints and found that they may look alike from afar, but up close one goes one way, while the other does something else and completely different.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidence at a crime scene, such as blood, DNA, fingerprints, or shoeprints all help forensic investigators determine what might have occurred and help identify or exonerate potential suspects.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Science Unit 4

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Answer: The individuality of fingerprints is due to ridge characteristics, which are ridge endings, enclosures and other details. Forensic scientists look for point-by-point comparisons in order to determine whether two fingerprints are the same.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    forensic science unit 8

    • 649 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fire scenes are different than regular crime scenes because the evidence that was at the scene of the crime is most likely burned and destroyed, also the individual who committed the crime is not at the crime scene usually. This makes it hard to piece together who did it or why. You will also at the same time have to use a different type of evidence to piece together the crime, instead of the evidence at the scene of the crime.…

    • 649 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We need to analyze and discuss each of the “Daubert Factors” to understand the reasons of doubt on the acceptance of fingerprint evidence. The Daubert standard provides a rule of evidence regarding the admissibility of expert witness’ testimony during United States federal legal proceedings. Pursuant to this standard, a party may raise a Daubert motion, which is a special case of motion in limine raised before or during trial to exclude the presentation of unqualified evidence to the…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    FINGERPRINTS ANATOMY

    • 505 Words
    • 2 Pages

    These days, fingerprinting people seems pretty cunning. With a DNA database, fingerprints seem like a reliable source. For example, if a homicide were to occur and investigators found five peoples difference fingerprints close to the scene, unskilled jurors may think the prints are associated with the crime, and accuse all five people guilty. The jurors would need more evidence to actually, by law, accuse a person, or people guilty of a crime, rather than just finger prints.…

    • 505 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most common strategy that forensic science experts uses is that fingerprints, bite mark and ballistics for the purpose of determining the real perpetrators of the crime. The reason is that when a person is involved in an offence and touches any of the items around the scene of the offence, the person's fingerprints are reflected on the item. Hence, the forensic team has a strategy of getting the fingerprints from all items found at the scene of crime regardless of the number of people that touched anything around the area. The most unfortunate thing is that the entire fingerprint-collecting process appears to be scientific in nature as it has a process that it is used to obtain the fingerprints. However, the process has over the time proved that the process is not entirely scientific a thing that has made the process to appear pseudoscientific. The reason is that a lot of biases have been noted to be emanating from the fingerprint process. A lot of inconsistencies, contradictory, and claims that the forensic team cannot prove has been…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidence is a type of proof. It is usually used to prove someone innocent or guilty. There are many different types of evidence, such as: testimony, direct, circumstantial, and physical evidence. However, according to the article “Forensic: Evidence, Clues, and Investigation” by Andrea Campbell, forensic evidence is the best evidence to present at a court case or trial.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Science

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are many types of ways to present evidence. This way the suspect can either be proven innocent or guilty. It is very important to make sure you have the right evidence because people can be proven guilty when really they are innocent if the wrong type of evidence is presented. That is why in the story “Forensic: Evidence, Clues, and Investigation” by Andrea Campbell, Forensic Science is proven to be the most important evidence to present in a court case.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dror was not trying to challenge fingerprint analysis as a science or its reliability but instead its ability to be influenced by the many elements that can affect those who examine the data. The possibility of falling vulnerable to psychological and cognitive bias exists when evaluating fingerprint data. External influences can cause an expert to make an unintentionally biased decision. Similarly, context, motivation, and emotions can distort perception and judgments causing experts to make mistakes in their evaluations (Ladwig, 2017). People can be corned into a frame of mind that can affect how they view and interpret information. Of course, this occurs on a subconscious level but is significant in evaluating the issues in fingerprint analysis. Therefore, it is important to apply and learn the cognitive and psychological influences in the processing of fingerprint analysis. There are many errors that experts can make in fingerprint analysis whether intentionally or unintentionally. These errors may stem from negligence, incompetence, cognitive and psychological phenomena and even a lack of accountability on the criminal justice system. Even though these vulnerabilities exist, fingerprint analysis is more reliable than eyewitness testimony. In forensic science, much of the data evaluated can be susceptible to human bias and nothing is ever 100% accurate. However, eyewitness misidentification contributes to 75% of wrongful convictions (Schwartz, 2017). It is not always possible for an eyewitness to accurately recollect events from a past crime and provide testimony that is completely reliable. There is an extraneous number of factors that can affect eyewitness memory. Many of these factors are both within and not within the control of the criminal justice system but highly affect a witness’s testimony. To conclude, both fingerprint analysis and eyewitness memory can be reliable sources but are never 100% dependable. This can be seen by all the…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fingerprint removal

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fingerprints have been used for centuries to help put criminals behind bars and the innocent out of jail, but some fugitives believe they can alter themselves to have no fingerprints and therefore have no way of being traced. However, fingerprints are not easy to get rid of, but that does not stop those crazy enough to try.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Module Four Lab Questions

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. Imagine that you are Alphonse Bertillon and you are trying to explain why you think fingerprints can be so useful to help solve crimes. What would you say to persuade them? Pretend you are explaining to someone who has never noticed fingerprints or thought about what they are.…

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For my Quick law assignment I was issued the legal term “Circumstantial evidence.” Circumstantial evidence is defined by duhaime.org as, “Evidence which may allow a trial judge or jury to deduce or logically infer a certain fact from other established facts, which have been proven.” Circumstantial evidence is also known as indirect evidence. It is best explained using the example of an individual walking into a building wet and wearing a raincoat; a person would then assume that it was raining outside although they themselves did not see the rain. From a legal standpoint fingerprints are an example of circumstantial evidence. Although a witness did not see the suspect use an object, scientific evidence can prove that the suspect had come into…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays