Interpreting the Constitution (Strict vs. Loose); Jefferson and Hamilt

Topics: Thomas Jefferson, Democratic-Republican Party, United States Constitution Pages: 6 (1897 words) Published: December 15, 2001
When the Federalist party was organized in 1791, those people who favored a strong central government and a loose constitutional interpretation coagulated and followed the ideals of men such as Alexander Hamilton. The first opposition political party in the United States was the Republican party, which held power, nationally, between 1801 and 1825. Those who were in favor of states rights and a strict construction of the constitution fell under the leadership of Thomas Jefferson. These Jeffersonian republicans, also known as anti-federalists, believed in strict adherence to the writings of the constitution. They wanted state's rights and individual rights, which they believed could only be granted under strict construction of the constitution. Thomas Jefferson, the third president, and James Madison, his successor, were close friends and lifelong political associates. Long regarded as advocates for liberty, Jefferson and Madison believed in the principles of government and sought to restore the spirit of the revolution of 1776. These republicans spoke out against anti-monarchial attitudes and opposed the aristocratic and elitist attitudes of the federalists (Peterson, 1975). A weaker central government by the people was the goal of the republican party. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, were two presidents who believed in the theory of the republican party, but due to circumstances within the parties and the increasing conflicts between Britain and France abroad, they found it increasingly difficult to act in a manner which coincided with their republican beliefs and at times had to reconcile their actions.

Jefferson's victory in the presidential election is notable because this was the first transfer of national authority from political group to another that was accomplished by peaceful and strictly constitutional means. He began his presidency with a plea for reconciliation and described his election as a recovery of the original intentions of the American Revolution (Ellis, 2000). In his true ideology, Jefferson said that a republic did not require a powerful central government to flourish. In fact, he felt that the health of the nation was inversely proportional to the power of the federal government. ******In Document A, Jefferson writes of the preservation of the constitution and the principles on which it was adopted. He wrote: "Our country is too large to have all its affairs directed by a single government" and that "The true theory of our constitution is the surely the wisest and best that the states are independent as to everything with themselves, and united as to everything respecting foreign nations." Jefferson believed that a weaker central government would be more beneficial for domestic policy, but for foreign policy, the central government, might have to take a stronger hand.

From early times in his public career, Jefferson was the subject of attacks on religious grounds. Although he kept his opinions regarding religion very much to himself, and considered this a very private concern his insistence of the complete separation of church and state was well-known. In a now famous letter to Danbury Baptists, Thomas Jefferson wrote "Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his god...their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; thus building a wall of separation between church and state." This letter affirmed Jefferson's belief that church and state should be separated and includes the celebrated phrase, "a wall of eternal separation" (Maier, 2000). His views on religion are also expressed in Document B******, Jefferson states, "I consider the government of the United States as interdicted by the Constitution from intermeddling with religious institutions, their doctrines, discipline or exercises...Certainly no power to prescribe any religious exercise, or to assume authority in...

Bibliography: 1. Ellis, Joseph. J, American Sphinx: The Character of Thomas Jefferson.
New York: Vintage Books, 1996.
2. Ellis, Joseph. J; Maier, Pauline, et al. Thomas Jefferson: Genius of Liberty.
New York: Viking Studio, 2000.
3. Ketcham, Ralph. James Madison; a Biography.
Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1990.
4. Peterson, Merrill, D. The Portable Thomas Jefferson.
New York: Penguin Books, 1975.
5. Rutland, Robert A.,ed. James Madison and the American Nation, 1751-1836: An Encyclopedia.
New York: Random House, 1994
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • This essay is on Strict vs. Loose construction during the presidencies of Madison and Jefferson

    ...newly ratified Constitution, there were two main political parties in existence, the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans. From the time period of 1801-1817, the two presidents that were elected to rule the U.S. were Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. Both Jefferson and Madison were Jeffersonian Republicans who were characterized as strict-constructionists in respect to the federal constitution before they each took the office of the presidency, but when they took office the public found out that Jefferson and Madison's previous characterizations had not been very accurate when, as president, they began to act like the opposite of what they originally believed in. In the years before his presidency, Thomas Jefferson was an anti-Federalist who believed in strict- construction of the Constitution. After the constitutional convention had taken place, Thomas Jefferson petitioned against the ratification of the newly written document, the Constitution. Jefferson also argued for a Bill of Rights in the Constitution. In a letter to James Madison Jefferson called for a Bill of Rights because it provided "freedom of religion, freedom of the press, protection against standing armies, ... and trials by jury in all matters triable by the law." In 1800, Jefferson, along...

    Read More
    1158 Words 4 Pages
  • Loose vs. Strict Constructionist Essay

    ... Loose Constructionist v. Strict Constructionist Interpretation of the Constitution The debate over how much power a government should employ over its citizens has been issue in the United States, since its first development of government. This clash of views essentially led to the formation of political parties, and was the first major political dispute in the United States. Federalist leader Alexander Hamilton who was pro strong central government, industrialization, businesses and banking, was for a loose interpretation of the Constitution, meaning the government had the right to interpret the Constitution and its contents based on connation, in order to protect its citizens according to the Necessary and Proper Clause. Republican’s, such as Thomas Jefferson, who was aiming in establishing America as an agrarian country favored a strict interpretation of the Constitution, meaning the government defines and applies the contents of the Constitution as they are, word for word, to be in accordance with the concept of state’s rights. The stance taken on this ongoing debate is inclined towards the side of loose constructionists, for its greater contribution in forming solutions to federal problems, helping the country flourish and aiding in today’s society as well. The idea of a loose interpretation of...

    Read More
    863 Words 3 Pages
  • Loose/Strict Dbq Research Paper

    ...Loose/Strict Constructionist DBQ By both definition and widespread perception the Jeffersonian-Republicans were strict constructionists, meaning they closely followed the framework of the Constitution. On the other hand, the belief was that Federalists, who thought the Constitution was open for interpretation, were loose constructionists. Although both the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison (Democratic-Republicans) mainly supported these theories, they, like other politicians of the time, often made exceptions to their “policies.” During Jefferson’s Presidency, he often conveyed his strict constructionist stance regarding certain issues; therefore he followed the ‘defined’ ideals of the Democratic-Republican Party. After just entering office (August of 1800), Jefferson sent a message to Gideon Granger (Doc. A), a future cabinet member. His letter depicted his opposition regarding the idea of a strong, “single” centralized government in America (a Federalist-minded view). For example, one of the most noteworthy things Jefferson did during his political career was outwardly oppose Hamilton’s plan for a National Bank. This truly demonstrated Jeffersonian-Republican opposition (before 1800) towards any sort of Federalist ideal. Throughout his political career, he also portrayed his belief in the...

    Read More
    797 Words 3 Pages
  • Jefferson vs. Hamilton Essay

    ...George Washington  Foreign Policy 1793 - Neutrality Proclamation 1794 - Jay’s Treaty  The British promises to get out of U.S. in Northwest  U.S. promises to pay back loyalists  No promises in the West Indies Reaction:  Anger from the Jeffersonians  Fear from the Spanish 1795 - Pinckey’s Treaty  Gives us access to the Mississippi River George Washington • Farewell Address  Avoid long-term permanent alliances  Be aware of political parties  Leaves and goes back home  Dies in 1799 Election of 1796 • John Adams - federalist • Thomas Jefferson - democratic republican • John Adams wins the Presidency and takes the Oath to Office in March Hamilton runs a group called “The High Federalists” (war like federalists) The XYZ Affair:  John Adams sends John Marshall to meet the French Foreign Minister - Maurice Talleyrand  Maurice Talleyrand sends 3 marshals to meet with them. The marshals try to make them give them a quarter million to see him.  John Marshall says no way and turns around  John Adams says “Million for defense, but not a cent for tribute”  This is the creation of the Navy and it brings back the Marines.  They name the 3 marshals X, Y, and Z. This is the creation of the XYZ Affair.  Undeclared War with France 1798 - 1800  During this time period France seizes our vessels. We wait and build up strength. Convention of 1800 Jefferson’s Foreign Policy  British - harasses American...

    Read More
    595 Words 3 Pages
  • Interpreting the Constitution Essay

    ...| | | Graded Assignment Answer Key Interpreting the Constitution Use the following question as a basis for writing a clear essay outline on the constitutional issues that divided the nation in the years leading up to the Civil War. Use both our knowledge of the time period and the information on pages 2 and 3 this document to help you organize your outline. You may use the secondary and primary sources below to help you answer the question. (50 points) 1. What were the major issues that drove the nation to Civil War in 1861? Follow the format in the example below to write your outline. I. Topic Sentence: First issue a. Support or proof b. Support of proof Essay Outline I. A. B. II. A. B. III. A. B. IV. A. B. V. A. B. Source A: Events Leading to Disunion • 1820 - Missouri Compromise: The legislation prohibited slavery in the newly acquired Louisiana Territory above the 36°30’N latitude line, admitted Missouri to the Union as a slave state, and Maine as a free state in order to maintain the balance of slave and free states in the Senate. • 1846 - Wilmot Proviso: Although the Wilmot Proviso banning slavery in...

    Read More
    946 Words 5 Pages
  • Jefferson vs. Hamilton Essay

    ...Research Paper: Jefferson vs. Hamilton Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were two very influential people with very different ideals. With land inherited from his father, Jefferson set himself up as a Virginia tobacco farmer. Once established as a planter, Jefferson entered Virginia politics. As a politician, he did not have the ability to make rousing speeches. Instead, Jefferson spoke eloquently through his writing. His words in the Declaration of Independence and other writings are still admired today. Since Hamilton had no money or family connections to help him rise in the world, he made his way on ability, ambition, and charm. George Washington noticed Hamilton’s talents in the early stages of the Revolutionary War. Washington made Hamilton his “aide-de-camp”, also known as a personal assistant. Near the end of the Revolution, Hamilton helped his cause by marrying Elizabeth Schuyler. She was born into one of New York’s most powerful families. With her family’s political background, after the war was over, Hamilton was elected to represent New York in Congress . Later, he served as a delegate from New York to the Constitutional Convention . Although they had different upbringings, the two had huge influences on the upbringing of the United States. Jefferson and Hamilton had two very different views on politics. Many clear thinking Americans could tell you at...

    Read More
    2046 Words 6 Pages
  • Ap American Dbq Strict and Loose Constructionists, Jefferson and Madison Presidencies Essay

    ...During the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the characterization of Jeffersonian Republicans as strict constructionists and Federalists as loose constructionists was generally true for the most part. While both Presidents were Democratic-Republicans and often adopted a strict constructionist view, there were several exceptions in which they or other Republicans adopted a loose constructionist view. The same goes for the Federalists, who had several examples of them adopting a strict constructionist view. During the time of the Jefferson and Madison presidencies, the Democratic-Republicans were often considered to be strict constructionists. This is seen in multiple occasions in which the Presidents (both of which were Republicans) or other members of the party took actions from a strict constructionist stand-point. While in office, Jefferson reduced the size of the Navy and put limitations on the military, which was a strict constructionist view at the time. The Constitution only gave the Federal government the power to maintain a military, and Jefferson felt that the country could be maintained with a smaller force, thus why he limited it. Jefferson also did not run for a third term, following the two-term limit policy that Washington had ‘created.’ By...

    Read More
    1030 Words 3 Pages
  • Broad constructionism vs strict constructionism Essay

    ...development and drafting of the constitution, two political parties were born. One labeled as strict constructionists, the Jeffersonian Republicans, and the other labeled as broad constructionists, the Federalists. The Democratic-Republicans such as Thomas Jefferson, were first labeled as anti-federalists and believed the states should have the most power in the government and most vowed not to sign the constitution without the addition of a Bill of Rights. They believed that if a power was not specifically stated in the constitution, then it could not be acted upon. The Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton, believed that they could exercise whichever powers on the basis that, even if a power was not physically stated, it could be interpreted from the specified powers. During the presidencies of Washington and Adams these characterizations of the two parties remained evident, but during the presidencies of Republicans, such as Jefferson and Madison, the line between strict and broad constructionism became a little more unclear. After the election of 1800 both the Federalist and Democratic-Republican party began to back down on their views of constructionism when faced with the task of deciding what would benefit the nation most. From the years of 1801-1817 the Democratic-Republicans held back on their strict views of the constitution but did...

    Read More
    1427 Words 4 Pages

Popular Essays

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free