Internal Auditing Practice in Governmetal Organizations

Topics: Auditing, Audit, Internal audit Pages: 39 (11880 words) Published: April 16, 2013

The Impact of Internal Audit Function Quality
and Contribution on Audit Delays

Mina Pizzinia
Cox School of Business
Southern Methodist University
Dallas, TX

Shu Lin
Craig School of Business
California State University, Fresno
Fresno, CA

Mark Vargus
LeBow College of Business
Drexel University
Philadelphia, PA 19104-2875

Douglas Ziegenfuss
College of Business and Public Administration
Old Dominion University
Norfolk, VA 23529

November 28, 2010

We thank the Institute of Internal Auditors for access to the Global Auditing Information Network (GAIN) database. We thank Chris Hogan, Barry Brian, and seminar participants at the University of Tennessee for their helpful comments. a Corresponding author

The Impact of Internal Audit Function Quality
and Contribution on Audit Delays


This study examines the role that the internal audit function (IAF) plays in the timeliness of financial reporting by investigating whether measures of IAF quality and the IAF’s contribution to the financial statement audit are associated with audit delay. Audit delay is the number of days between a firm’s fiscal year-end and the report date (Ashton et al. 1987). Pursuant to Section 409 of SOX, a 2002 SEC ruling shortened 10-K reporting deadlines for accelerated filers from 90 days to 60 days over a period of three years (U.S. Congress 2002; SEC 2002). At the same time, Section 404 of SOX significantly expanded internal control audit requirements and Auditing Standard No. 3 (AS 3) increased audit documentation requirements (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board [PCAOB] 2004a). Recent studies indicate that the acceleration in reporting deadlines, together with stronger attestation requirements, has compromised the reliability of accounting information by requiring auditors to do more work in less time (Bronson et al. 2010, Lambert et al. 2010). Given the potential tradeoff between the timeliness and reliability of disclosures and the opportunity for the IAF to affect the financial statement audit, it is important to investigate the IAF’s role in audit report timeliness. We conduct our tests using data from 215 firms that provided detailed responses to the Institute of Internal Auditor’s Global Auditing Information Network (GAIN) survey for 2003-2004. Results indicate that IAF quality is negatively associated with audit delay, suggesting that increases in IAF quality lower control risk, and thereby reduce external auditor effort. Analysis of individual aspects of IAF quality indicates that audit delays are decreasing in the level of IAF competence, objectivity, and fieldwork quality. We also find that audit delay is approximately three days shorter when external auditors use work performed by the IAF, suggesting that IAF contribution can improve the efficiency of the financial statement audit.

The Impact of Internal Audit Function Quality
and Contribution on Audit Delays


This study investigates whether the quality of a firm’s internal audit function (IAF) and the degree to which external auditors use work performed by the IAF to complete the financial statement audit (i.e., IAF contribution) affect audit delay. Audit delay, measured as the number of days between a firm’s fiscal year-end and the report date, generally captures the time required to complete fieldwork (Ashton et al. 1987). The auditing literature has long recognized the importance of audit delay research because audit delays affect the timeliness with which financial and audit information are publicly disclosed (Givoly and Palmon 1982). Current interest in audit delay stems from recent accelerations in reporting deadlines and the implementation of Section 404 of the Sarbannes-Oxley Act (SOX), which together require auditors to perform more work in less time (U.S. Congress 2002; Ettredge et al. 2006;...

References: Adams, M., M. Sherris, and M. Hossain. 1997. The determinants of external audit costs in the New Zealand life insurance industry. Journal of International Financial Management 8(1): 69-86.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1983. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 47: Audit risk and materiality in conducting an audit. New York.
_________. 1991. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 65: The auditor’s consideration of the internal audit Function in an audit of financial statements. New York.
Anderson, T., and D. Zeghal. 1994. The pricing of audit services: Further evidence from the Canadian market. Accounting & Business Research 24 (95): 195-207.
Ashton, R. H., P. R. Graul, and J. D. Newton. 1989. Audit delay and the timeliness of corporate reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research 5(2): 657-673.
Ashton, R. H., J. J. Willingham, and R. K. Elliott. 1987. An empirical analysis of audit delay. Journal of Accounting Research. 25(2): 275-292.
Bamber, M. E., L. S. Bamber, and M. P. Schoderbek. 1993. Audit structure and other determinants of audit report lag: an empirical analysis. Auditing: A Journal of Theory & Practice 25 (2):1-23.
Bronson, S. N., C. E. Hogan, M. F. Johnson, and K. Ramesh. 2010. The unintended consequences of PCAOB auditing Standard Nos. 2 and 3 on the reliability of preliminary earnings releases. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Forthcoming.
Carcello, J., D. R. Hermanson, and K. Raghunandan. 2005. Factors associated with U.S. public companies investment in internal auditing. Accounting Horizons 19 (2): 69-84.
Chambers, A. E. and S. H. Penman. 1984. Timeliness of Reporting and the Stock Price Reaction to Earnings Announcements. Journal of Accounting Research 22(1): 21-47.
Chung, D. Y., and W. D. Lindsay. 1988. The pricing of audit services: The Canadian perspective. Contemporary Accounting Research. 5(1): 19-46.
Committee on Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 1992. Internal Control – Integrated Framework. AICPA.
Ettredge, M. L., C. Li, and L. Sun. 2006. The Impact of SOX Section 404 Internal Control Quality Assessment on Audit Delay in the SOX Era. Auditing: A Journal of Theory & Practice 25 (2):1-23.
Felix, W. L., A. A. Gramling, and M. J. Maletta. 2001. The contribution of internal audit as a determinant of external audit fees and factors affecting this contribution. Journal of Accounting Research. 39(3): 513-534.
Fogelman, S. L., B. H. Peterson, W. G. Heninger, and M. B. Romney. 2007. New SEC interpretative guidance and AS5 give companies and auditors a chance to make internal controls more efficient. Journal of Accountancy Dec.: 62-65.
Gerrard, I., K. Houghton, and D. Woodliff. 1994. Audit fees: The effects of auditee, auditor, and industry differences. Managerial Auditing Journal 9(7): 3-11.
Gist, W. E. 1992. Explaining variability in external audit fees. Accounting & Business Research 23(89): 79-84.
Givoly, D., and D. Palmon. 1982. Timeliness of annual earnings announcements: some empirical evidence. The Accounting Review 17(3):486-508.
Goodwin-Stewart, J., and P. Kent. 2006. Relation between external audit fees, audit committee characteristics, and internal audit. Accounting and Finance 46: 387-404.
Hackenbrack, K. E., and W. R. Knechel. 1997. Resource allocation decisions in audit engagements. Contemporary Accounting Research 14(3): 481-500.
Hakansson. N. H. 1977. Interim disclosure and public forecasts: An economic analysis and a
framework for choice
Hogan, C. E., and M. S. Wilkins. 2008. Evidence on the audit risk model: do auditors increase audit fees in the presence of internal control deficiencies? Contemporary Accounting Research 25(1): 219-242.
Institute of Internal Auditors. 2004. Internal auditing 's role in Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Available at
________. 2009. International standards for the professional practice of internal auditing. Available at
Jaggi, B., and J. Tsui. 1999. Determinants of audit report lag: Further evidence from Hong Kong. Accounting and Business Research 30(1): 17-28.
Jiang, W. and J. Wu. 2009. The impact of PCAOB Auditing Standard 5 on audit fees. The CPA Journal April: 34-38.
Kinney, W. R., and L. S. McDaniel. 1993. Audit delay for firms correcting quarterly earnings. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 12(2): 135-142.
Knechel, W. R., and J. L. Payne. 2001. Additional evidence on audit report lag. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 20(1): 137-146.
Lambert , T. A., K. L. Jones, and J. F. Brazel. 2010. Unintended Consequences of Accelerated Filings: are Mandatory Reductions in Audit Delay Associated with Reductions in Earnings Quality? Working Paper. University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Leventis, S., P. Weetman, and C. Caramanis. 2005. Determinants of audit report lag: some evidence from the Athens stock exchange. International Journal of Auditing 9: 45-58.
Newton, J. D., and R. H. Ashton. 1989. The association between audit technology and audit delay. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 8(Suppl.): 22-37.
O’Keefe, T. B., D. A. Simunic, and M. T. Stein. 1994. The production of audit services: evidence from a major public accounting firm. Journal of Accounting Research 32 (2): 241-261.
_________. 2007a. Auditing Standard No. 5: An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated with An Audit of Financial Statements. Available at
_________. 2008. Staff Audit Practice Alert No. 3 Audit Considerations in the Current Economic Environment. December 5. Available at
Raman, K
Simunic, D. A. 1980. The pricing of audit services: theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18(1): 161-190.
Schneider, A. 1985. The reliance of external auditors on the internal audit function. Journal of Accounting Research 23 (2): 911-919.
Schwartz, K. B. and B. S. Soo. 1996. The association between auditor changes and reporting lags. Contemporary Accounting Review. 13(1): 353-370.
Security and Exchange Commission (SEC), 2002. Release No. 33-8128 Acceleration of Periodic Report Filing Dates and Disclosure Concerning Website Access to Reports. Washington, D.C.: SEC.
_________. 2004. Release No. 33-8507 Temporary Postponement of the Final Phase-in Period for Acceleration of Periodic Report Filing Dates. Washington, D.C.: SEC.
_________. 2005. Release No. 33-864 Revisions to Accelerated Deadlines for Filing Periodic Reports. Washington, D.C.: SEC.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • internal auditing Essay
  • Internal auditing Essay
  • Internal Auditing Essay
  • Internal Auditing Essay
  • Auditing Practice Essay
  • The Scope of Internal Auditing Essay
  • internal auditing Essay
  • Essay on Auditing and Internal Controls

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free