Intelligent Design in Public Schools

Topics: Intelligent design, Teleological argument, Truth Pages: 7 (2712 words) Published: December 4, 2006
Public Schools:
Why they should stick to the facts

Since the day immigrants landed on the shores of this Nation it has been a high priority of the government to ensure that all citizens have the opportunity to receive a equal and proper education. The Public school system is an opportunity for children of all social and economic backgrounds to obtain a standard education in this country. For the most part, if a student is willing to put in hard work and good effort, they are provided with the potential to take their education to the next level and then onwards to a fulfilling career. In order for the system to be as effective as possible, a consistent standard must be implemented around the country. The theory of evolution and creationism has become a sensitive issue as of late and many feel changes need to be made in how it is taught in public schools. There is so much we have yet to discover about our evolution and the evolution of the universe and until we learn more it is important to teach children facts that have concrete proof as opposed to ideas and theories which are more religiously based. Also, since our country is founded on diversity, different people/students have different viewpoints on many subject matters, including creationism or design. For these reasons, I believe intelligent design should not be taught in public schools. If a child or parent is curious about the subject, they should seek outside instruction and allow for public schools to teach factual curriculum in order to maintain a level of consistency. From the dawn of time, we as humans have been attempting to explain and identify events and phenomena which we have experienced. Many of these events such as the creation of the Earth and its different species have been virtually unexplainable due to a lack of knowledge and information. As a result, humans, from confusion and curiosity, developed theories and ideas attempting to explain what could not originally be explained. Distinct groups of people would soon come to collective conclusions on certain matters and as a result religions have formed. Religious values are extremely important in society as they provide us with proper morals and respect for one another, regardless of what religion way may choose to follow. Religion is a subject that should be taught to a child by a parent in the household, it is not something that should be learned in a public school setting. A parent has the option of sending their child to a religious school if they really want someone else to teach religion to their child. Teaching a child religion is equivalent to teaching a child to be kind to others, to respect their elders, to chew with their mouth closed, and so on. These aren't topics one would expect a schoolteacher to instruct a child on, these are topics parents teach their children. I am a strong advocate of religion. I believe it teaches a child many important principles and values that he or she can carry with them throughout the course of their lives.

I agree with many aspects of intelligent design. I am a firm believer in the existence of God or an equivalent force or being with infinitely more power and knowledge than a human being. Michael Behe, a proponent of intelligent design provided an interesting synopsis of what this idea is about, "…a single system which is composed of several well-matched interacting parts that contribute to the basic function, wherein the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning (Behe, Molecular Machines: Experimental support for the Design Inference)." This is apparently the design principle of the intelligent design theory. This is the system which the designer creates and all of the components must be working uniformly. This is a very accurate example of how designers and engineers create a working, functioning product. The intelligent design argument however is that nature could not have...

Cited: Soccio, Douglas J. Archetypes of Wisdom: An Introduction to Philosophy. 6th ed. Thompson Learning. CA. 2007
"Intelligent Design"
Dutch, Steven. David Hume and the argument from Design. 11 March 2002.
Edis, Taner and Young, Matt ed. Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the new Creationism. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2005.
Johnson, Phillip E. The Wedge of Truth. Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 2000.
Linder, Doug. Notes on Policy and Legal Issues Concerning "Intelligent Design Theory. 2001.
Price, John Vladimir. David Hume: Updated Edition. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1991.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Intelligent Design & Evolution in Public Schools Essay
  • Intelligent Design Essay
  • Essay about Public Education: Teaching Evolution, Creationism, and Intelligent Design
  • Public School Essay
  • Essay on Public Schools
  • Evolution vs. Intelligent Design Essay
  • School Essay
  • Intelligent Design Not Intelligent Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free